I liked Karen Tae's article, "Which authors would you invite to dinner?" (HERE)
Tae makes the interesting observational that people can be disappointed when they meet the author of their favorite book -- because the author is not the same person who wrote the book; that person has moved one!
Books are like time capsules of a certain stage of a writer's thought process, creative energy and emotional space. Generally, once the story has been told, the author goes on to the next project and by the time the long, painful process of publishing has been endured and the reader gets their hot little hands on a copy, it will have been years since the completion of those early drafts. People can change a lot within the space of months, let alone over two or three or four years.I never thought about that, but it's certainly true! King does pretty good reflecting on the person he was when he wrote various books. Robert Mccammon got frustrated with people only wanting to discuss Swan Song, and at least for a while refused to talk about the novel! Imagine that -- you could sit in a library and talk with friends or reading groups about the book, but the author did not want to discuss it. It seems King has always been quite willing to talk about his work.
So who would you invite to dinner? On Tae's list is Stephen King, with a strange notation about Tabitha that I don't quite understand. (Wouldn't she also count as an author?) About King, Tae writes:
Who wouldn't want to have Stephen and Tabitha King over for dinner?! He could regale me with horror stories while I drain the spaghetti and stir the sauce. Tabitha would naturally be in charge of dessert. And I could discuss post-apocalyptic fiction with King and when exactly he thinks they might turn the Dark Tower series into movies.Why is Tabitha "naturally in charge of dessert"? Is that a reference to a book or an inside joke? I don't get it. Ben Stein voice. . . anyone, anyone, anyone. . .
Thinking of dinner with a writer, I ate dinner one night with my wife and her family at the Old Spaghetti Factory. My wife excitedly told everyone not to bother with spaghetti sauce, but to instead get the mizithira cheese because the menu said Homer lived on it when he wrote the Odyssey. We followed this direction, and all wished we had some sauce.
MY CHOICES FICTION:
1. Stephen King
2. Charles Dickens
3. Arthur Conan Doyle
4. Ray Bradbury
5. Ken Follett
And to each meal, I would invite Ed Wood to be my sidekick to keep the conversation flowing. (Or Woody Allen)
MY CHOICES NonFICTION:
1. Rick Warren (Pirpose Driven Life)
2. Gary Thomas (Sacred marriage)
3. Aaron Eby (Boundary Stones)
4. Errol Morris (A Wilderness Of Error)
5. Carl Sandburg (Lincoln series)
YOUR TURN!
What an odd thing to say about Tabitha King...
ReplyDeleteI would not invite any of my favorite authors to dinner. I live with five cats; my apartment is perpetually dirty, and I'd hate for a notable author to have to see it!
I think I'd also invite Bradbury, King, Dickens and Doyle. To that list I'd add:
ReplyDeleteJ.R.R. and Edith Tolkien
C.S. Lewis and Helen "Joy" Lewis
G.K. Chesterton and his wife.
Valerie and T.S. Eliot.
The thing to keep in mind though is that it helps to be at east some kind of judge of character, something the article seems to not take into account. In other words it might make things more interesting if any of these authors WERE to come to dinner and you'd read enough about them to the point where you have at least a rough idea of their personality traits ticks, and maybe even hang ups.
For instance, Chesterton wrote probably THE BIOGRAPHY of Dickens, and in regard to his childhood once referred to Boz as "The insolent little sod."
As you might guess, there's a story behind that, a rather amusing one too.
A link to Chesterton's biography of Dickens available on internet archive can be found here:
http://archive.org/stream/cu31924013462407#page/n5/mode/2up
Here's a real challenge. Would you be willing to invite the great American filmmaker John Ford to dinner?
ChrisC
Have just looked up Eby's Boundary Stones and was directed to the following website: www.boundarystones.com, which contains a decent video giving Stones layout.
ReplyDeleteAs a token of good faith then, and considering the holidays are around the corner (or upon us depending on how you look at it) here Reverend are some books I was planning to recommend for the Xmas wish list.
Planet Narnia: Michael Ward
A Rebirth of Images: Austin Farrer
The Revelation of St. John the Divine,
Commentary on the English text by Farrer
Along with the sites for the following:
www.planetnarnia.com, containing info on a documentary, The Narnia Code, based on Ward's book.
http://www.thestarofbethlehemmovie.com/
www.starofbethlehem.net
Both sites related to a docu. by Rick Larson regarding the astronomy of the Nativity. If Bethlehem.net is down at this writing, try again later. There is also a public domain copy of Beth. doc. available at Internet Archive with this link:
http://archive.org/details/TheStarOfBethlehem.divx
I don't know if this does any favors or not. Farrer's two books on Revelations are both rewarding, yet he's a demanding writer, however the extra effort is worth it.
A good rule is to read the Ward-Narnia book then move on to Farrer, as there is valuable info in Ward that shed's light on Farrer, and C.S. Lewis, and most important, reveals a level to scripture, Old and New, that I don't think few scholars have picked up on and have missed.
You'll just have to take my word when I say, the Ancient Israelites knew more astronomy than they let on.
I don't if any of this does any good, either way, Feliz Navidad.
ChrisC
It occured to me I should add Farrer isn't like that guy who said the whole thing would end sometime around or near my birthday as it turns out, and he's also miles away from Lahaye and Jenkins as it's possible to get.
DeleteFarrer's scholarly and erudite. Just to set doubts at ease.
ChrisC
Aaron Eby would be fun to have to dinner both because of what I do and don't agree with him about. THe discussion would be spirited. But, unlike many Christians, I do not think the Old Testament should just be done away with, thrown out. It has practical hand on lessons that make the faith very real.
ReplyDeleteIn that case (oh no, not again!) you might interested in "The Year of Living Biblically" by A.J. Jacobs.
Deletehttp://www.ajjacobs.com/books/yolb.asp
It details one man's quest to see if he can follow every rule and live, in essence, the Great Book. The fact that Jacobs is Jewish sort makes the book about Western Civilization remembering itself.
Also, one of the interesting things Farrer's books point out is how much the Old Testament informs Revelations. In fact, part of the action of the book is a description of Temple ritual and festival celebrations.
ChrisC
I read year of living Biblically and hated it. He isn't living it out with sincereity, but just making a mockery of Scripture (my opinion only).
ReplyDeleteJacobs didn't ask what was to be applied to modern living, but just acted like all of it was to be obeyed -- even what are called "laws of the land" (stoning, etc.) Meaning he was throwing little stones at a man living with a woman. Completely rediculous -- again, my opinion only.
Yes, Revelation is centered on OT symbolism. Every line relates back to either Torah or Ezekiel, Isaiah or Zac.
Let me apologize. I meant no offense.
DeleteChrisC
sorry if I seemed offended, I was not.
ReplyDelete