This is the SEVENTH PART of an article by Bryant Burnette summarizing the Golden Years television show. As Bryant pointed out in the first post, we should not confuse the television series with the 3 hour hashed movie.
This was originally posted at Burnette's blog, thetruthinsidethelie.blogspot.com
Episode 7 (airdate
08/22/1991)
The final episode of the series arrives, under
the direction of Michael Gornick.
The teleplay is once again by Josef Anderson,
from a story by King, but it's worth pointing out that there are two different
versions of the episode: one which ends on a cliffhanger (complete with a "To Be
Continued..." title card) and one which offers a resolution. The ending with
the resolution was apparently aired in foreign markets, once it became apparent
that the series would not be renewed by CBS.
I would speculate that the studio mandated that
King and Anderson write and film an alternate ending that could be used to
provide closure, and therefore make the project seem like a more attractive
option for home video and for reairings on cable. We're not concerned with that
alternate version much here; that'll be the subject of a later post that
examines the differences between the original episodes and the home video
version.
The episode begins with Terry and Crewes
stealing a car, and then cuts to Moreland, who is still back at the airbase.
He's in the cockpit, pretending to be a fighter pilot. This man -- this
character -- is a grade-A buffoon; one of the worst characters in King's canon,
without a doubt. In another scene, two more of the worst King characters ever
meet: Toddhunter and Billy the janitor. Toddhunter is bereft of assistants, so
he enlists Bill's annoying help. Both of these actors are still working, and
have worked steadily in the last two decades; I suspect neither is particularly
proud of the performances they gave on this series. Bad acting notwithstanding,
Toddhunter's experiment is a success: he makes a clock run backward, and then
disappear. Hooray...?
Francie knows a place where they can all hide;
it's a house of hippies. One of the hippies goes by the moniker "Captain
Trips," so any King fan worth his salt knows this fellow is probably no damn
good. Sure enough, he turns out to be an informant, and he sells our heroes
out. Before long, The Shop has set up shop on the street where the hippies
live. Moreland, who was discovered at the airbase, has been brought along for
the ride, and he's melting down big-time. He's quite concerned that the
appropriate paperwork hasn't been done. Think of a slightly less obnoxious
Craig Toomey (from The Langoliers) and you're on the right
track.
Gina's been clutching her heart and looking
pale a lot lately, so you figure something bad is going to happen there. Harlan
seems to sense it, too, so he dances with his wife for a while, and when they
wake up the next morning they have a final roll in the hay. Keith Szarabajka
and Frances Sternhagen are good in these scenes; they have a dry sort of
chemistry, and while it doesn't work as well as you sense everyone wants it to
work, it works better than it probably has any right to have worked.
Moreland finally snaps, and runs outside to
start shouting about how this whole operation is most irregular and can't be
tolerated. Andrews shoots him dead, and before long the assault on the
hippie-house is on. Gina has a heart attack, or something, and Harlan won't
leave her; Terry -- who seems upset to an out-of-character degree -- and Crewes
reluctantly abandon the "old" man, and make their escape (offscreen) through a
big storm drain that the house somehow connects to. Harlan walks outside
carrying Gina's body, and is tranked by Burton; he passes out cold, but not
before he tries to bite Jude's ear off.
Terry and Crewes regroup, and for no real
reason that seems all that plausible to me, decide to return to Falco Plains and
try to rescue Harlan. Toddhunter, meanwhile, has visited his father's grave
again, so that he can monologue a bit and dig up one of the watches he'd
previously buried. As the episode ends, Harlan is in bed at Falco Plains, his
eyes glowing green while he is under sedation.
To Be Continued...
This episode, like much of the series, is just
not particularly good. There are occasional moments in which the plot almost
begins to work, and some of the acting is good. However, all of the scenes
involving Moreland are awful, and "Captain Trips" is a fairly lousy character as
well.
One major issue I have has to do with the
character of Francie. She was introduced in the previous episode, seemingly as
someone who would be of major importance. She's in this episode, too, but
disappears after a couple of scenes; she's headed for Wisconsin, where she knows
someone who can get them all fake IDs and new lives. There is a scene in which
Terry and Crewes are -- prior to the assault on the house -- trying to figure
out their next move, and they mention going to meet up with Francie in
Wisconsin, so it seems likely that if the series had continued, they'd have met
up with Francie again eventually. However, given how adamant she was in the
previous episode about going with her parents, I'm not sure it makes a bit of
sense for her to take off for Wisconsin at the first available opportunity.
This smells to me; specifically, it smells like someone was unable to figure out
how to keep Francie alive during the assault on the house, but knew she would
need to be alive for something later on in the story.
Sadly -- or not so sadly, depending on your
perspective -- we never got the rest of that story. As I mentioned earlier,
there is an alternate ending that offers at least some resolution,
but it is clearly a rush-job, and does not seem like something King would have
written naturally. Instead, it seems like an exercise; "alright," some studio
executive says to King, "if you had a gun to your head and had to
end the series definitively in two minutes, how would you do it?"
It doesn't work, either. The cliffhanger is
unsatisfying, but it at least seems like a natural progression.
Everyone's mileage will vary on this subject,
but for my tastes, I'd rather be left with an unfinished work than with an
unfinished work that has a hastily-composed ending stapled onto it.
Alas, since the original episodes remain
unavailable commercially, the stapled version is all that most King fans have.
It may be that that is King's preferred version; he's had very little to say
about Golden Years in the years since, so far as I can tell, and it would
be foolish of me to assume that he isn't basically okay with the hoe-video cut
of the film. Maybe he isn't; but then again, there's no proof to back it
up.
My final take on this series is that it is
mostly a mediocrity. The production values are slight, the acting occasionally
bad, the structure of certain scenes ill-considered. However, the concept -- a
man has a science-powered accident and begins aging in reverse, then has to go
on the run with his elderly wife to keep them both from being killed -- is a
solid one, and King managed to create a few good characters. It'll never
happen, most likely, but I'd love for him to sit down and write the whole thing
as a novel one of these days.
In a way, the other work within King's canon that Golden Years reminds me of the most is The Plant, that famously unfinished novel that King published online in several installments. The extant material is known as Book 1, "Zenith Rising," but there do not seem to be any particular plans to complete the story, and what we have is good, but does end in anything even vaguely resembling a satisfying, conclusive manner. Golden Years, in some ways, is a similar case: both stories represent Kingus Interruptus, and while it stands to reason that his career has seen a large number of works that withered and died on the vine, these are perhaps the only two cases in which they did so publicly.
As such, they both represent an intriguing insight into what a failed King story looks like. There are remarkably few of those; for the hardcore King fan, that, perversely, makes them rather compelling, in their own strange ways.
Or perhaps that's just the lack of sleep talking...
In a way, the other work within King's canon that Golden Years reminds me of the most is The Plant, that famously unfinished novel that King published online in several installments. The extant material is known as Book 1, "Zenith Rising," but there do not seem to be any particular plans to complete the story, and what we have is good, but does end in anything even vaguely resembling a satisfying, conclusive manner. Golden Years, in some ways, is a similar case: both stories represent Kingus Interruptus, and while it stands to reason that his career has seen a large number of works that withered and died on the vine, these are perhaps the only two cases in which they did so publicly.
As such, they both represent an intriguing insight into what a failed King story looks like. There are remarkably few of those; for the hardcore King fan, that, perversely, makes them rather compelling, in their own strange ways.
Or perhaps that's just the lack of sleep talking...
"An intriguing insight into what a failed King story looks like. There are remarkably few of those; for the hardcore King fan, that, perversely, makes them rather compelling, in their own strange ways."
ReplyDeleteWell, when it comes to what fails and what succeeds, I think a lot of factors have to be taken into account, not all of it on the author's side. The audience also has to be examined, at least in some sense, if only to figure out why they like what they like and if that like/dislike can help qualify a story as good or bad.
...Did I just construct Everest in as few words as possible?
ChrisC
The audience is certainly complicit in determining what fails and what succeeds, in the commercial sense.
DeleteYou also get the occasional example like "John Carter," where the salesmanship of the product is highly lacking in skill. This actually happens much more frequently than you might think. Another, slightly more recent, example would be "Jack Reacher," which is an excellent mystery/action/suspense film starring one of the bigger movie stars in the history of movies. And yet, it has struggled (to put it mildly) to find an audience, because Paramount utterly failed to convey to audiences that there were good reasons to see the movie.
I don't remember anything in terms of what the public reaction to "Golden Years" was. I suspect it behaved, ratings-wise, in a similar fashion to "Kingdom Hospital," which got fantastic ratings for the first episode but then shed viewers by the millions week after week, until scarcely anyone was watching by the end. Assuming that is the case, then the blame -- to the extent that the word "blame" applies to an artistic endeavor -- rests solely with the production itself. In the case of "Kingdom Hospital," the marketing was strong, the interest on the audience's part was good; the product simply failed to deliver, from the audience's standpoint.
My guess is that exactly the same thing happened with "Golden Years."