The issue here seems to be the question of adaptation.
My take is, if the story holds true enough to the essentials of the source material (or in certain rare cases, if the changes in some way enhance the story i.e. Roger Rabbit, Green Mile, Stand by Me) then I'm willing to say that a film is the book or story proper.
As for whether the Carrie film approaches the book, well, Moretz was determined to portray the book character, however I have a different take on the main character.
For me it's never a question of innocence, or envy of the same. The main character is the result of a bad environment, in fact a whole bad culture (making Carrie similar to other of King's Death of a Small Town stories) and in the end is really the catalyst for that whole society's rush to self-destruction. That's sort of why I thought of it in terms of a school and town like a mental ward where the doctors and staff have abdicated, and the patients are in control.
However, I'm not sure if the film ever got that element down right or not, as if done right, th idea of this whole society destroying itself could have served as a good engine for onscreen suspense, as it would have carried the ever present threat of sudden violence from any quarter, similar to a film like "Good, the Bad and the Ugly".
However, again, I'm not sure whether I'd say this Carrie really "is" the book or story.
I was one of the naysayers that thought Moretz was too pretty for the role and it's nice to hear her address this issue and her take on it. Having said that, Ms. Moretz may have based her performance on the literary Carrie but director Kimberly Peirce clearly had the cinematic (Depalma) Carrie in mind.
In short, readers both familiar and unfamiliar with Stephen King's novels will find a motherlode of interesting information inside the pages of Brighton David Gardner's insightful and illuminating treatise.
I can't recommend it enough, so be sure to get it either for your Kindle or e-Reader of choice, or buy the print version because it's easily worth twice the cover price.
The issue here seems to be the question of adaptation.
ReplyDeleteMy take is, if the story holds true enough to the essentials of the source material (or in certain rare cases, if the changes in some way enhance the story i.e. Roger Rabbit, Green Mile, Stand by Me) then I'm willing to say that a film is the book or story proper.
As for whether the Carrie film approaches the book, well, Moretz was determined to portray the book character, however I have a different take on the main character.
For me it's never a question of innocence, or envy of the same. The main character is the result of a bad environment, in fact a whole bad culture (making Carrie similar to other of King's Death of a Small Town stories) and in the end is really the catalyst for that whole society's rush to self-destruction. That's sort of why I thought of it in terms of a school and town like a mental ward where the doctors and staff have abdicated, and the patients are in control.
However, I'm not sure if the film ever got that element down right or not, as if done right, th idea of this whole society destroying itself could have served as a good engine for onscreen suspense, as it would have carried the ever present threat of sudden violence from any quarter, similar to a film like "Good, the Bad and the Ugly".
However, again, I'm not sure whether I'd say this Carrie really "is" the book or story.
She's welcome to SAY that it's based on the book, but it's clearly a remake of DePalma movie moreso than an adaptation of the novel.
ReplyDeleteI still liked the movie a lot, though.
I was one of the naysayers that thought Moretz was too pretty for the role and it's nice to hear her address this issue and her take on it. Having said that, Ms. Moretz may have based her performance on the literary Carrie but director Kimberly Peirce clearly had the cinematic (Depalma) Carrie in mind.
ReplyDelete"Clearly"? I don't think so. I think the PRODUCERS clearly had DePalma's film in mind; Peirce, not necessarily.
Delete