King and Bradbury: Fear and Technology

image credit: elive.com.ua


by Brandon Engel

Although some critics dismiss the work as low-brow and sensationalist, horror and science-fiction literature can have socially redeeming value, if only insofar as that both lend themselves to identifying common sources of anxiety and dread. Horror typically deals with primal, visceral fears - isolation, bodily harm, or other more abstract neurosies. Science fiction typically has something factual as its basis, and offers grim speculations about issues pertaining to science and industry, such as the implications of space travel, or widespread fear of rapidly advancing technology itself becoming an instrument of oppression.

Even more disturbing than the notion of technology being used as an instrument of oppression is the idea of machines functioning with some level of autonomy, perhaps acting as instruments of oppression by their own volition. This is a theme familiar to genre fans. It was a concept addressed in several episodes of The Twilight Zone, and it is also a theme which Stephen King has embraced himself, notably in the novel Christine (which was later made into a film directed by John Carpenter), about a 1957 Plymouth Fury with a mind of its own and a lust for human blood. King also explored the concept more ambitiously in the horrendous, cocaine fueled script for the film Maximum Overdrive, wherein all electronic appliances are trying to kill people.

Years before King was a professional writer, his hero, Ray Bradbury, had explored similar concepts himself. You may recall Bradbury’s short-story August 2026: There Will Come Soft Rains, which tells the story of an eerily vacant, fully automated suburban home. In keeping with all of the advances in domestic technology that were abundant in the United States in the years after World War II, the house Bradbury envisioned was capable of speaking to the home’s occupants, preparing meals, and even lighting cigars. We come to learn that the family who owned the house was vaporized by an atomic blast; we catch glimpses of silhouettes permanently burned into the sides of buildings, and baseballs that have become forever embedded in the side of house. The house inevitably burns itself to the ground - reinforcing the notion that technology, if left unchecked, could be our undoing as a civilization. Bradbury had also toyed with this concept in some of the stories he contributed to E.C. horror comics in the fifties, most notably the story entitled The Coffin, which tells the story of an elaborate, fully automated coffin which entraps a man, and buries itself deep into the earth. These stories challenge romantic, egalitarian notions of technology as something that has bettered society wholesale and they also provoke speculation as to what degree technology is a potential liability for humanity.

Bradbury’s writing address anxieties that were rampant in the cold war era. The United States had demonstrated its nuclear capabilities by obliterating Nagasaki and Hiroshima, and at the height of the cold war, anxieties ran high. Children of the cold war era may recall going through the drills in school where the entire class would crouch underneath desks. Mock villages were constructed for the sole purpose of being decimated by test bombs. There was also intense friction between the western empire and the former U.S.S.R., and the unspoken truth behind the space race was that both superpowers were demonstrating their potential military capabilities. For instance, it was horrifying to the American public when Sputnik was first launched in 1957.

What’s alarming about the present day is that it often feels like real world technology is, in effect, manifesting some of the anxieties. With all of the paranoia in recent months surrounding the NSA scandal. and stories about Google acquiring the home automation company Nest, it’s more than a little disconcerting to read about things like the ADT Pulse home automation system that controls multiple household functions (kitchen appliances, heating and cooling, etc.) from a single smartphone app. What happens when someone hacks into our mobile phone when we leave it in the back of a cab? Or worse, what happens when the tech giants who manage these systems (who may or may not be working in tandem with the government) gain even more insight into our day to day lives - so much so that our smartphones might essentially function as the “telescreens” predicted by George Orwell in 1984?

Technology plays an increasingly large role in society, and for every advantage and convenience this affords, it also opens up new and elaborate means for people to harm one another. It’s for this reason that science fiction and horror should not be outright disregarded as trivial or unsophisticated - but rather, as a vehicle for discussing wide scale problems.


* * * * * * * * * * 
Brandon Engel is a blogger in Chicago who loves vintage horror and classic speculative fiction. Among his favorite authors are Arthur Machen, H.P Lovecraft, and of course, Stephen King. Follow Brandon’s zany adventures (and misadventures) on Twitter: @BrandonEngel2

Stephen King’s Scary House

This is reposted from house-crazy.com with permission.

image: flicker.com/ (by: Madeleine_H – Madeleine Holland)
Why wouldn’t the king of horror have the creepiest house in New England?

There’s a gazillion pictures of the exterior of writer Stephen King’s house on the Internet (driving by his house is somewhat of a pilgrimage for horror novel fans). But there are few, if any, of the interior. Stephen King and his wife Tabitha (who is also a writer) would like to keep it that way as they value their privacy behind the batty gates.


image: downeastdilettante.wordpress.com (via Bangor Daily News)

Nonetheless, being the curious house-peeper that I am, I decided to do a little digging to see what I could find out about the house’s history.

image from: commons.wikimedia.org (by: Blaine Puckett)

The King manor was built in the mid-nineteenth century. Official records state the year 1870 but I found one account that claims the house was built as early as 1858.

The home is located in Bangor, Maine and the address is widely available on the Internet for curious fans and dedicated stalkers. The poor King family has in fact been dogged by stalkers and I read that they have to employ bodyguards to keep people at bay.

The King’s (Stephen, Tabitha and their three children) purchased this home in 1980, after living for a year in Boulder, Colorado – where King famously wrote The Shining. The house in Bangor was intended as a second home but soon became the King’s primary residence.

image: flickr.com (by: By MERealtah – Denise Reed)

The King’s now own two other homes including one in Lovell, Maine and one in Sarasota, Florida where they spend the winter. But it is the historic house in Bangor that attracts the most attention.
This might have something to do with the creepy appearance of the house – in line with the home owner’s notorious obsession with all things dark and ominous.

Mr. King added spiders to the fence (inside the spiderwebs at the center of the gates) and bats to the top of the gateposts.  He later regretted adding this detail, as it makes tourists even more likely to stop and take photographs. - from: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ashorriblyitryii/

image: flickr.com (by: By The Facey Family – Blake Facey)

I’ve read in the past that the King family used to go all out for Halloween at the house in Bangor. It would not be hard to dress this morbidly Victorian home for a night of Halloween fun. 

Unfortunately, things got out of hand and too many people  began showing up at the King house on Halloween (one year as many as 1400!) so the tradition was halted.

In recent years, the King’s have resorted to taking out ads in the local newspaper announcing that they would not be at their house on Halloween, so please stay away.

image: flickr.com (by: By cliff1066™ Cliff)

Anyway, back to the house’s early history…

One account I read stated that the house was built at a cost of $7000 – mind you, this was a decent sum of money back in the mid-nineteenth century.

The structure is set on just over one acre of land and was built to resemble an Italian Villa. The original part of the house was built from wood and had only one tower (the tower on the right).


image from: flickr.com (by: wonder_al Al)

The multi-sided tower on the left hand side of the house was added in 1895. The large front porch was later added in 1912.

image: flickr.com (by: The GC Four)

The house today is much bigger than it appears from the street. It clocks in at 4,952 square feet according to zillow.com, and it has 5 bedrooms and 6 bathrooms. The home is technically zoned “multi-family” though I could not find any record of when the home was last used as a multi-family dwelling.

The modern reincarnation of the house features an attached barn which has an indoor swimming pool. There is also a 3 car garage and Stephen King’s writing studio is located at the rear of the house.

Here’s an aerial shot of the estate from Virtualglobetrotting.com:

image from: virtualglobetrotting.com

In 2011 the county tax assessor valued the King home in Bangor Maine at $1,188,900. I found two nearby homes currently for sale on the same street for $425,000 (see here) and $299,000 (see here).

Unfortunately for the Kings, this beautiful (slightly creepy) home has been a magnet for adoring fans, crazies, and house lovers alike. It is probably one of the most photographed private homes in America.

In fact, when I looked at the Google street view, there were people ogling in front of the house in the image captured by one of Google’s famous roving photo cars!

Screen shot of Google maps street view of Stephen King’s house

The King’s clearly cherish this house and I hope they never change the spooky spider web/bat gate – it just makes the house grin with glee - in my opinion anyway.

image from: commons.wikimedia.org (Julia Ess – Creative Commons)

~~~
Sources:
Stephen King’s official website
Wikipedia Stephen King page
Flickr Stephen King photos
Stephen King’s  house on Trulia.com
Stephen King’s house on Zillow.com

Fearnet: The Horror Community's Best April Fools Pranks



Check out John Squires list of best pranks the horror community played on us this April fools.

About King: Over on his official website, Stephen King got in on the April Fools' fun by teasing that he was writing a sequel to Christine, titled Christine Lives. 'Christine Lives picks up where Christine left off,' wrote King, 'and follows the trials and tribulations of Dennis' descent from school teacher to carnival barker as he attempts to evade the smoking tires of fate.' The announcement included a link to a video of King's announcement, which was actually a video of Rick Astley's 'Never Gonna Give You Up,' in disguise. Rick-rolled by the King... a true honor!

Check out the full article at: www.fearnet.com

Grisham and King



I love John Grisham books.  Or, I should say, I loved them.  I fell out of love years ago when I decided there was a formula going on.  Good young lawyer hooks up with evil law firm; young lawyer is tempted to go bad, but ultimately takes on the system and brings down the house.

There are more than a few Grisham books I think are awesome.  The Pelican Brief, The Testament, The Client, The Firm, The Street Lawyer -- and more.

Truth is, it's hard to read two writers who write a LOT of books. Stephen Colbert asked Grisham if the two had a rivalry going to see who could write the most words per day.

All that to say that I started reading a John Grisham book the other day.  Back to familiar ground.

King and Grisham have very different writing styles.  King is very character driven, while Grisham is all action.  "I'm very plot driven," Grisham once said.  "I don't waste time with other things."  That's the truth!  Of course, I'm listening to an abridgment, so that speeds up the plot all the more.

Grisham tends to talk over scenes instead of dropping the reader into them.  King likes to build a story like a movie, scene my scene.  Grisham narrates over the scenes, sometimes giving big sweeping explanations.  King typically dispenses information one bit at a time as through the characters.  That means that the reader does not usually know more than the characters themselves.  We might pick up new information when King switches characters.  Grisham speaks more directly to the reader.  He freely gives the reader information that the characters in the novel don't have.

By the way, both ways are totally valid forms of story telling.  King at times employs this method.  For instance, in Eyes of the Dragon, King spends a lot of time talking right to the reader  about the story, giving the reader gobs of information the characters don't have.

Grisham discussed his writing style, noting that he does a lot of outlining and planning.  That's something King says he doesn't do  -- outline. Grisham also said he writes every day, about six pages a day.  Actually, that's the same pace King once said he keeps.  Explains why they are  both so productive.

In the book I'm reading, Grisham absolutely stunned me.  It's called, The Confession, about a pastor who gets a visit from a criminal.  The criminal confesses he murdered a woman; a crime a young black man is about to be executed for.  "I know where this is going," I thought.  I won't ruin the novel for you, but I was blown away.  There were twists and turns I sure didn't see coming.

So tell me what your favorite Grisham books are.  As for me, I'd choose: The Pelican Brief, The Testament and The Confession.



How Stephen King Will Mess With Your Head

Photo, clydemovies.blogspot.com
Happy April 1 -- April fools day.  Did Stephen get you today (stephenking.com/promo/christine_lives)

Reposted from November, 2009.

Whenever I start to get immersed in a Stephen King book, I have to be ready for my head to be messed with. As a teen reading the Stand, I got a little freaked out by old people coughing in church. "super flu," I'd whisper to my sister.

Under The Dome is no exception. My wife and I took a long drive to the next town over so we could listen for a while. But I kept driving slower, and slower as I listened. Why am I driving so slow, I asked myself. Then I realized: I don't want to hit that invisible wall too hard!

IT has caused more than one person to hate clowns. But I hated them before I read IT. Clowns are freaks, I'm glad King messed them up officially. Of course, IT messed with my head in other ways, too.talkstephenking
.
And cell phones, do I even go there? I don't even carry my cell phone. King's fault? Probably not. I really don't like talking on the phone. But I might as well blame it on King.

The Tommyknockers makes it impossible for me to just leave stuff in the ground. I have to dig it up. So far, no space ships, though.

And if you think King doesn't mess with people's heads, why do you think you can't pick up a copy of Rage at the bookstore? Because it messed with someone a little too much, and they went Craig Toomey.

this is good. . .

Last year our church did a Christmas program. Part of the program involved a mother saying goodnight to her child -- both obviously missing the deployed father. It was a touching scene.  So the corner of the stage was set up like a bedroom.

Of course, the stage was cleared to do this. But the walls of the church were not. So there it was: A child's bedroom scene. But towering over the bed was the cross on the church wall! Normally the cross is not a freaky site, but with the bed right under the cross -- I suddenly had visions of Carrie White! Thanks Steve.

Tell me, how has Stephen King messed with your puny mind?


David Aaron Gray: What does Shawshank Redemption have in common with Lindsay Lohan, Casper the Friendly Ghost, and the Scariest Clown in History?


This is from David Aaron Gray's blog, reposted with permission.  Thanks!  (Check out his map, it's pretty cool)


When thinking of an American state that will be the location of your film or story, I bet you could name 44-48 of our United States before you would settle on boring old Maine.

Well, the author behind Shawshank Redemption (as well as countless terrifying tales), Stephen King, chose Maine for the location of virtually all of his well-known works. And if you have ever been to the 23rd state admitted to the Union you'd quickly realize that it offers writers and directors a remote venue in which to tell their disturbing story (equipped with dark and disquieting natural scenery).

Besides being a popular attraction for Stephen King fans, Maine's only other appeal exists in its potential to become a swing state in a Presidential Election (but this is somewhat rare).

As a side note, Maine must have been unpopular with the founding fathers. If you look at a map of the East coast of the U.S., it would be logical to make Maine the 14th state admitted to the Union (post the Revolutionary War which created the original 13 states). But no, as I mentioned earlier, Maine doesn't get into club America until 1820 as state #23 (after Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi). There were even serious rumors circulating in March of 1820 of making California a state before Maine. Now, you don't need to look at a map to conclude how insulting this would be to residents of Maine. For all we know, the only people in 1820 who could actually attest to the existence of this so-called "California" were Lewis and Clark.

Maine only got in as part of the famous Missouri Compromise whereby Missouri would be a slave state and Maine a free one. I think the South got the better end of that deal.

Well, maybe not deemed important to Congress, Stephen King, lobsters and a bunch of summer camps still call Maine home and below is an annotated map of some famous films set in lucky #23:



LINK: Paging Doctor Sleep



Here is an interesting review of Doctor Sleep by Merab-Michal Favorite and Drew Winchester at The Bradenton Times.

The reviewers declares that King's classic horror novel, The Shining, is far more frightening than Kubrick's movie, which they found terrifying in itself.  In fact, the word used to describe reading the novel  is "trauma."  Of course, when a book makes that big an impression, the expectations for the sequel are gargantuan.  The review focuses on King's decision to take dramatically different approaches in terms of writing to the original novel.
While the tale The Shining is one unsurpassable in the minds of horror enthusiasts, it’s refreshing to see that King didn’t try to make a sequel similar to the plot of the legendary book. Instead, it’s a totally new take on Dan Torrance and I think it was the right call

10 Things Not To Say To A Stephen King Fan



1. I love Stephen King, too.  I don’t read the books, but I’ve seen the movies.  (Great.)

2. Doesn't he just write about monsters? (Sure, that’s what he does.)

3. Have you read the one about the clown?  (Yeah, we have.)

4. I don’t read his stuff.  I read Insomnia once but didn't finish.  (Neither did most of us)

5. I prefer movies like The Green Mile to all that Stephen King stuff.

6. Why can’t I read your copy of The Shining?  (Because it’s a first edition)

7. Do you only read Stephen King?  (Uh-huh.  Made it clear through college and seminary reading nothing but Stephen King.)

8. He’s too scary for me.  I read that book – what’s it called? – about the girl with the powers. (Carrie.  He doesn't just write scary stuff.)

9. I don’t need to read Under The Dome, I saw it on TV.

10. Stephen King didn't write Stand By Me.  (Yes he did)
Nope, I checked his book list, it’s not there.  (That's because it's not called Stand By Me.)
See, I told you he didn't write it.  (It's called the Body.)
Hey, that's not on his book list, either.  (It's in another book called Different Seasons)
Yeah, I don't think you're thinking of the same movie.  I'm talking about Stand By Me, about a bunch of kids.  (Okay, whatever.)

Finally . . . I'm not a Stephen King fan, I'm a constant reader.  What's the difference?  I'm interested in what he writes, not chasing around after him.

Cemetery Dance Has A Deal For You. . .

I like Cemetery Dance a lot.  Mostly I like the books they publish.  My copy of Full Dark No Stars was awesome!  As was the anniversary edition of IT.  And for both those books, I paid a lot.  But I was willing because they were Stephen King special editions.

Cemetery Dance is currently promoting sales of a book about the Salem's Lot miniseries, titled, "Tobe Hooper's Salem's Lot: Studies in the Horror Film."  The 464 page book is due out in April, 2014.
Few horror films in the history of television can boast the deadly seriousness, inspired casting, indelible images and lingering impact of Salem’s Lot. Tobe Hooper’s adaptation of Stephen King’s 1975 novel about vampires that infest a small Maine town was first broadcast in November 1979. 
The three-hour film featured unforgettable performances by an array of stars — James Mason, David Soul, Lew Ayres, Bonnie Bedelia — along with one of the most truly terrifying monsters in the history of movies: the feral vampire Mr Barlow played by Reggie Nalder. 
This book documents the gestation and production of the film. There are reminiscences from cast and crew, including new and exclusive interviews with Tobe Hooper, David Soul, cinematographer Jules Brenner and producer Richard Kobritz; dozens of images, including many never before published behind-the-scenes production stills; deleted scenes from the original teleplay; foreign posters and artwork inspired by the film; photographs of Ferndale, California, where the exteriors of Salem’s Lot were filmed; and much, much more.
That looks really neat!  But there is a bit of sticker shock on this one.  How about $40 for the PAPERBACK.

I'm not suggesting collectors won't buy this book, because obviously CD knows their market.  What I'm wondering is why.

Mr. Mercedes is selling for $18.00 first edition hard cover.  Revival is selling for 19.48.  So for $37.48 you can have BOTH Stephen King first edition new books -- or there the $40 Salem's Lot book.

Leads me to a curious question.  What price should books about Stephen King be set at?  


 

Carrie Paperback



Carrie paperback -- AWESOME!  Notice the lack of giant lettering "STEPHEN KING."  In fact, the author is completely underplayed on both the front and back.  -- Thanks Shaun Lawton!

Young People Are Still Tuned In To Carrie



Altadna Library gave teens 11-17 the opportunity to give a Teen Choice award to their favorite novel.  The award went the 2011 novel Divergent, by Veronica Roth.  The teens gave honorable mention to Black Cat, 2012; Inheritance, 2011; and Diary of a Wimpy Kid, 2007.  And then – right in the middle of those books was Carrie, 1974.

So the earliest book before Carrie was 2007 -- and then they choose a book 33 years its junior.  Why?  Because Carrie continues to connect with readers.

Why do you think Carrie has such lasting power?

(altadena.patch.com)

Is Pennywise In New York?


How  would you like to encounter this clown on the side of the road?  A pennywise-eque clown is making his rounds through New York's Staten Island.  What is the clown doing -- handing out balloons, of course.  Nothing harmful in that, right?  Well, as yahoo reports, people are actually pretty freaked out! (FULL STORY: yahoo.com/blogs)

The people who live in the New York City borough are not thrilled with their new addition. Robert Privtera, who took a picture of our friend, told the Advance, “Bro, I did a double take. My heart stopped." Vincent Innocente characterized it as bizarre. People are taking to Twitter and voicing their concern as well…
Pennywise has been making a lot of sightings lately, including on google maps and in England.



From my September 17, 2013 article:
PENNYWISE IS ALIVE:


Pennywise might have been chased off from Derry Maine, but he's not dead!  The evil clown has been making appearances throughout the United Kingdom borough of Northampton.

Shea Bennett of Media Bistro says, "Residents are, as you’d imagine, spooked, and you can understand why – imagine seeing this guy standing outside your window?"

Indeed, the clown has become so popular that a Facebook Page erected on Friday has already picked up more than 25,000 Likes, with the clown using Facebook to update fans, as well as fend off a few slightly sensationalised reports. 
As for why he’s doing all of this, that still remains unclear. But, as we can see from the photos, he has balloons. So, I guess the only question that really matters, is…
(Source: www.mediabistro.com)

Now. . . a question --  If you saw Pennywise,  would you pause to take a picture?  Well, I probably would.  But I don't think I'd have the courage to go up and say howdy.  Just for fear of hearing him say, "They float!"

And -- another question -- does anyone think the British Pennywise is perhaps a bit more, eh, scary than  the American versions?  I don't know why,  but I find that clown just flat out creepy.  And that's not to put down Curry's performance in the mini-series.  In fact, it's probably good Curry didn't look that scary, or I would have died watching it.



Mr. Mercedes & Revival On Amazon Pre-Sale





Looks like Mr. Mercedes and Revival are ready to go.  What format will you be reading it in?  I usually go audio book, my wife Kindle, and my kids. . . aren't allowed to read Stephen King yet.

Charlie Fried's Scrapbook, 4


Films of 1994! An ad for Shawshank Redemption video tape. From a catalogue directed at video stores.


The Stand video tape. An ad aimed at video stores.


Oh my, it's an ad for video stores to buy bulk copies of The Langoliers. There's a special "6 pack offer." Also advertised is a "Deluxe 5 Standee!" and Theatrical size poster, and shelf talkers.



This is straight forward: 4 Audio books for 99 cents. And hey, how often do you see Stephen King on the same page with Barbara Bush?


Here is an article Charlie clipped from. . . somewhere. It's a article by Stephen King extolling the virtues of an ice ax. I'll type it up when I have time, because it's really cool.


Here is an early internet page, I think, listing the Filmography of Stephen King.


A handbill for North American Premiere of the stage version of Misery. Oct 19-Nov 11, 1995.



This one is interesting! It's an ad for spanish Stephen King audio books.

"Captivating Personalities." I do not know what this is from. On the page are: Sally Jessy Raphael, Stephen King, Gene Siskel, Jim Morris, Jenny Jones, Ben Vereen. The King caption reads:
Stephen King: Simply the most popular writer alive. Stephen King is a phenomenal talent who dominates the best seller list like no one ever has. From early classics such as Carrie, the Shining and The Stand through recent works including Misery and Needful Things, his novels have caused countless sleepless nights and inspired some of Hollywood's biggest blockbusters. An equally masterful storyteller in person. King is a rare treat at the lecture podium.
And that, friends, brings us to the end of Charlie Fried's Stephen King scrapbook.

Charlie's Scrap Book, 3







The overlook is a personal picture that simply says on the back "overlook hotel." I wonder if he took it himself.

Charlie's Scrap Book, 2

Don't miss the personal photo of The Sandpipe, from IT. Below is Charlie's photo of the King home.

King speaking.
Add Image