Showing posts with label Danse Macabre. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Danse Macabre. Show all posts

Will Errickson: Danse Macabre by Stephen King (1981): Oh, Baby, Do Ya Wanna Dance?


This is from Will Errickson's blog, toomuchhorrorfiction. Of course, there can never REALLY be too much horror fiction, right Will?  Reposted with permission. Check out his blog!

Danse Macabre by Stephen King (1981): Oh, Baby, Do Ya Wanna Dance?

He may not be Harold Bloom, Leslie Fiedler, or Michiko Kakutani, but Stephen King once wrote what I consider one of the most perfectly devastating criticisms of bad writing ever. Comparing a now mostly-forgotten novel by an unknown writer that he felt was "written pretty good" to the then-current rulers of the bestseller lists, King wrote this author was no Saul Bellow, no Bernard Malamud, but at least not down there in the steerage with people like Harold Robbins or Sidney Sheldon, who apparently wouldn't know the difference between a balanced line of prose and a shit-and-anchovy pizza.

Down there in the steerage. A shit-and-anchovy pizza. Holy living fuck, do I love that. Inelegant, crude, and yet right on the money. In fact, I love nearly everything about King's Danse Macabre, which is where you'll find that immortal dismissal. Written after he'd just made a name for himself with the hardcover success of The Shining (1977), it's a very personal and informal rumination on horror entertainment in the latter half of the 20th century, coinciding mostly with King's life specifically and baby boomers in general (he was born in 1947 - which means he was nearly 10 years younger than I am now when he wrote this book. Sigh). I first read it as a young teenager, and it also served well in introducing me to various cultural touchstones I wasn't learning about in high school: the uneasiness Americans felt after Sputnik (a pivotal event in a young King's life), the Charles Whitman and Kent State shootings, Charles Manson, the Vietnam War, Black Panthers, and Erica Jong's charming concept of the "zipless fuck."

Almost effortlessly (the genesis of the book was his college lectures teaching a course on supernatural literature), King relates background info on horror in all media: he fondly recalls the Cold War "bug-eyed monster" horror films of the '50s and '60s but heaps scorns on Plan 9 from Outer Space and Robot Monster. Then there's old-time horror radio star Arch Oboler and his "Lights Out" series, as well as TV shows like "Thriller," "Night Gallery," and "The Outer Limits." He muses about changing tastes and sophistication in audiences as well as root causes for our fascination with the macabre (or "mcbare" as he pronounced the word as a youngster). Tying all this together are autobiographical sketches about his youth as an American kid brought up by a single working mother, moving from one town to another and engaging with some of the odder members of his extended family. And then one day he discovers a box of old pulp fiction paperbacks that had once belonged to his now long-departed father, read his first H.P. Lovecraft tales, and a fate was sealed (Lovecraft; as it ever was, as it ever shall be).

As you can probably guess, this is no academic tome filled with references to "hermeneutics" or "metatextualism" or anything like that; Danse Macabre is digressive, insightful, funny, unpolished, wide-ranging, wrong in some places and oh-so-right in others. King's background as a one-time English teacher and lifelong committed reader with catholic tastes allows him to expound, if only briefly, not simply on the horror fiction we all know and love but also commonly venerated writers like Faulkner, Flannery O'Connor, Kurt Vonnegut, Joyce Carol Oates, Paul Theroux, James M. Cain, Joan Didion, and Jim Thompson. And ever the rock'n'roller, King references late '70s punk rock kings the Ramones and the Sex Pistols - at a time when few music fans in America had any inkling who they were - noting a similarity between their gleeful noise-making and anti-establishment rabble-rousing and the seemingly antisocial aims of many horror movies. He admits he kinda likes The Prophecy, a much-hyped film failure in the late '70s but says his favorite horror movie of that day is the little-seen Tourist Trap. King is one of those guys that just soaks up whatever's out there; it is as if he is quite literally no snob.

As one might expect, he devotes an entire long and thorough chapter on horror fiction in which he covers a handful of modern works that he feels define various aspects of the genre: Peter Straub's Ghost Story, Shirley Jackson's The Haunting of Hill House, Jack Finney's Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Anne Rivers Siddons' The House Next Door, Ray Bradbury's Something Wicked This Way Comes, Harlan Ellison's collection Strange Wine, Richard Matheson's The Shrinking Man, and Ramsey Campbell's first novel The Doll Who Ate His Mother. While expressing disdain for the lifeless aridity of grad-school student theorizing King does some of his own, but it's a livelier, chummier, albeit just as informed approach he takes, sometimes graceless and glib, but often apt and unpretentious.

Whether it's breaking down the famous opening paragraph of Jackson's novel, or marveling at the "ominous jocularity" of Ellison's stories, or discussing how the Gothic tradition is twisted around in Straub's early novels, King really just likes kicking back and talking about what he loves and knows. He lets the authors speak for their own works by quoting at length their letters to him, although acknowledging that sometimes authors are not the best critics of their own work.

A few of King's ideas in Danse Macabre have become pretty well-known as part of horror criticism: the horror genre is "as conservative as an Illinois Republican in a three-piece pinstriped suit" because it wants us to reject the maniacal and monstrous outsider, to see the taboo and avoid it and celebrate our healthy selves (this was some years before Clive Barker, remember). He posits that when a horror movie builds up suspense and then shows the audience a 10-foot tall insect, they sigh, "I can handle a 10-foot tall insect; at least it wasn't 100 feet tall, that would've been pretty bad" (I don't think that one holds up well today in the CGI age; modern audiences are more likely to complain "A 10-foot tall insect? Why wasn't it 100 feet tall?"). But most famous of all is this honest admission, which seems to sum up Stephen King and much - but absolutely not all - of his fiction:

I recognize terror as the finest emotion and so I will try to terrorize the reader. But if I find that I cannot terrify, I will try to horrify, and if I find that I cannot horrify, I'll go for the gross-out. I'm not proud.

Two appendices complete Danse Macabre: one on essential horror film and one on essential horror fiction since the 1950s or so; I've mentioned here before that I've used the latter list as general guide over the years. This is a book I have dipped into over and over again over many years with a deep and abiding pleasure and which inspired in me the desire to look at horror in a larger and more thoughtful way, rather than just taking in the latest movie or novel everybody's talking about. All serious, and burgeoning, horror fans should own a copy. Functioning like a kind of alternative education in art high and low as well as in 20th century Americana, Danse Macabre is an absolutely unmissable and essential piece of horror entertainment itself, from the one and only King.

You might also like: 

William Castle and Stephen King


William who? William Castle! Shock horror director of the 50's and 60's. He was known for his gimmicks. Castle was the king of promotion. He really thought he'd made it when he got Robert Bloch (Psycho writer) and Joan Crawford (Mommy Dearest). Castle's long time dream was to equal Alfred Hitchcock.
.
There's a great documentary on William Castle titled "Spine Tingler! the William Castle Story." He invented Emergo. . . one step beyond 3D. Some films allowed for a "punishment poll" which allowed the audience to vote on the movies ending. Of course, there's no evidence they movies actually had multiple endings, because an audience will always vote for the bad guy to get knocked off.
.
So what movies would make great William Castle movies? Well, I'd like to see what he would do with Christine. How about giving him a shot at Children of the Corn, everyone else has messed with it!
.
You know a lot of Castle's movies, they include: The House on Haunted Hill, 13 Ghosts, I Saw what you did.
.
Castle didn't just direct B-movies. He also produced Rosemary's Baby. His desire was to direct the film, but that honor fell to Roman Polanski.
.
Carrie-Carrie- Castle Scary?
.
So I guess the real question is: What kind of gimmicks would Castle put with a Stephen King movie? He once offered life insurance for every person going to see his movie -- giving their beneficiary a real check if they died of fear during his movie. He put buzzers in the seats of the theaters to jolt certain audience members and scare them all the more. Now imagine getting shocked at the end of Carrie when that hand comes grasping out of the grave!
.
Some King movies frustrate me enough that I think: Might as well give them to someone who would at least know how to ham it up and create some hype. Langoliers comes to mind -- but that's not scary enough for Castle, so I withdraw the nomination. How about Needful things.
.
King On Castle
.
Stephen King wrote in Danse Macabre about Castle's film Macabre: "This William Castle feature Macabre -- his first, but unfortunately not his last -- was perhaps the biggest "gotta-see" pictrue of my grammer school days. Its title was pronounced by my friends in Stratford, Connecticut as McBare. "Gotta-Ssee" or not, very few of our parents would let us go because of the grisly ad campaign. I however, exercised the inventiveness of the true aficionado and got to see it by telling my mother Iwas gong to Davy crockett, a Disney film which I felt I could summarize safely because I had most of the bubble-gum cards."
.
King spends some time in Danse Macabre describing Castle's gimmicks. (Page 182 of the hardcover). King then says about The Tingler, "a film so exquisitely low budget that afera thousand people had seen it, now escape me, but there was this monster (the Tingler, natch) that lived on fear. When its victims were so scared they couldn't even scream, it attached itself to their spines and sorta . . well . . . tingled them to death. I know that must sound pretty stupid, but in the film, it worked (although it probably helped to be eleven years old when you saw it. )As I remember, one sexy miss got it in the bathtub. Bad news.
.
But never mind the plot; let's get on to the gimmick. at one point the Tingler got into a movie theater, killed the projectionists, and some how shorted out the electricity. At that moment in the theater where you were watching the movie, all the lights went out and the screen went dark. Now as it happened, the only thing that could get the Tingler to let go of your spine once it had attached itself was a good loud scream, which changed the quality of the adrenaline it fed on. And at this point, a narrator on the soundtrack cried out, "The Tingler is now in this theater! It may be under your seat! So scream! Scream! Scream for your lives!!" The audience was o course happy to oblige, and in the next scene we see the Tingler fleeing for its life, vanquished for the time being by all those screaming people.
.
The Difference
There is a massive difference between Stephen King and William Castle -- quality. We can laugh at some of King's movies, because he didn't do them. But King never feels the need to give us gimmick's. In fact, he sometimes seems a little annoyed at over priced gimmick's -- the work can stand on its own two feet.
.
So when my Pretty Pony came out, with a clock embedded in the book, King didn't express a lot of excitement. Unlike Castle, there's not a confidence issue with King. He doesn't try and get the reader to buy the book just because of a gimmick.
.
Now, that's not to say publishers don't offer gimmick's! Anyone remember the nightlight that came with Desperation and Regulators? How about a Blockade Billy baseball card? How about a Pennywise magnet? A toy Christine car? And so on.
.
King doesn't fill his work with gimmick's, either. That is, there is more than just blood and guts to a Stephen King story -- it's always about the characters.

Do These 5 King Stories Deserve TV Shows?



Daniel Dockery at hecklerSPRAY has an article titled, "5 Amazing Stephen King Stories That Should Be Adapted For TV."

I like this line, "And as much as the master of horror literature is everywhere, he deserves to be everywhere-er."

Unfortunately -- I don't agree with any of these.  Of course, we all want Dark Tower to get off the ground, but not as an ongoing series.

Dockery's list:

  • The Dark Tower
  • The Running Man
  • 1922
  • Salem's Lot
  • Danse Macabre

Now 1922, which Dockery suggests as a mini-series, would be one depressing night after another!  I mean, it is not the kind of story that needs to be slowed down.  I found it delightful -- but dark.  Really dark!

And The Running Man ?  We haven't gotten enough yet?  We want to watch this play out week after week?  No thank you!

The one I found most interesting was Danse Macabre.

Dockery writes:

I wasn’t very interested in horror until I read “Danse Macabre.” It wasn’t become my favorite genre until I borrowed King’s treatise on horror on film, literature, TV and radio from a friend, and after that, there was no going back. Before Danse Macabre, I considered it cool that I knew what a Halloween IV was. Now, if one of my friends doesn’t know who Richard Matheson is, I begin my research into how to kill the pod people impersonating my loved ones. 
“Danse Macabre” is non-fiction, but it would be so cool to have a show that explored a different facet of horror in every episode. Stephen King could be involved as sort of the “Crypt Keeper” of it all, introducing episodes, and the rest of the running time could be spent seriously discussing and researching the mythology of such a great genre. You could interview other notable people who work in the genre, and the number of possible guests to include is endless.
That would be cool!  But it would be hard  to draw it together out of a book that is so old.  

So what King stories would make a good series?  Mostly the longer stuff, because there is more material already strewn.  So writers don't have to stretch the story, it's already big.  For a series to be really good, it has to have characters we want to come back and visit over and over again.  That's true of The Stand and IT for sure.  I actually found Under The Dome a little void of likeable characters.  Barbie was okay --but just okay.  I am hoping for good things fromthe series.

  • Under The Dome
  • The Stand
  • IT
  • The Talisman

Books that would make a good mini-series -- I think Needful Things would be great.  The novel was creepy, had great characters and came together quite nicely.  I liked it a lot.

For Sale: One Haunted House


Put it on the list of things my wife won't buy me. . .

  • I ask for a Pennywise Action Figure -- no.
  • A first edition gunslinger -- no.  Apparently she is not excited about a first edition, since it is exactly like the second edition I already own.  She can't see paying $600+ for a page that says "First Edition."  Sigh.  I do suffer in life.
  • And, AND. . . she won't even consider buying the Amityville house.  Imagine that.  Sure, it's pricey -- but there wasn't even a conversation: "How our family could raise a million dollars to buy the Amityville house."  She just said "no."  

It is suddenly important, as I read her this post, that I note that she does let me buy all kinds of crazy Stephen King stuff.

CNN.com reports that the Amityville house is up for sale:

The decision wasn't triggered by demonic activity, however. Apparently, another frightening "D" word was to blame. 
"My husband and I are getting a divorce," said Odalys Fragoso, who bought the house with her husband Jose Fragoso in 2001. "It's not that the house is haunted or anything. We had wonderful times in that house." 
Hold on. . . They are  getting divorced and selling the house, But, "we had wonderful times in that house." Huh?  They had such wonderful times, they decided to sell the wonderful house?

Interesting Stats:
The house is 3,370 square feet.  The Fragoso's bought it for $795k, and are selling it for $955k.  That's a hefty increase in the current housing market!  Aren't most houses selling for less?  But then, most  houses don't come with pig-ghosts and walls that ooze.  I think denying the haunted house story misses a great sales opportunity.

Broker Donna Walesiewicz was quoted as saying, "It is what it is, a nice old stately home."

That's what it is?  No it's not!  It's a house where several people were murdered, and the next  couple  moving in reported some crazy demon activity.  It's a house that was the basis for a best selling book, major movie, and endless spin-offs.  It's not just a nice old house!

There is one thing that would  be really annoying. . .  unwanted visitors.  The CNN story notes,
Dozens of fans of the movie have appeared at her doorstep over the years, taking pictures and asking questions. "They were thrilled that they filmed the movie there," Fragoso said.
The Book
I read the Amityville Horror as a teen.  I think it's scary.  I also think the movie is scary; partly just because the house has eyes and the soundtrack (children singing) is haunting.  By the way, the house no longer sports those freaky windows.

The book is not only scary, it's funny.  When not trembling in fear, I was laughing out loud.  It's like a bunch of kids are telling this story.  "And then, she was levitating off the bed. . . and then this pig was running through the snow. . . and then, really, George heard a band playing in the living room. . . and then the toilets oozed black stuff. . . and then we couldn't find the money we were supposed to watch. . . and then . . .

I heard one of my favorite preachers, Calvin Miller (who died this year) talk about reading Amityville Horror.  He said he was getting on a plane, and a friend said, "You've got to read this book."  So he takes the book and reads it on the plane.  When he got off the plane, he drove to the Seminary he would be speaking at.  The guest house was a huge Victorian home -- and he was the only one staying in it.  Miller said, "Honestly, as those Godly people showed me to that house on the rainy night -- all I could think was AMITYVILLE, AMITYVILLE!"  (That's so funny!)

Miller says he lay in bed terrified in that big empty house.  Then he just started shouting Scriptures  out into the darkness.   That's great!

What makes the book scary is that it is written in something of a documentary fashion.  It moves day by day and chronicles the families terrors.

Ryan Turek at Shock Till You Drop has a nice review of the movie, as well as some Stephen King quotes about it (which you can also find in Danse Macabre).

"The Horros Of SK" AWESOME!



Okay, there are "spoilers" here.  But I don't think my essay is really going steal any thunder.  There is nothing like listening to King talk about these movies.

I absolutely loved TCM's "The Horrors Of Stephen King."  It is one full hour of King talking about horror films.  It's like having an updated visual version of Danse Macabre.  He says that the movie that scared him most was 1980 "The Changling."  He also notes that one of the great horror films that really works is "the Exorcist."  He seems to have been highly affected by Psycho, and references it often.  In fact, Psycho is identified as a "demon coaster."  Nice!

King's discussion of women in slasher films is interesting!  "He says that these movies are saying if you want to view women as victims, you do so at your peril, because a strong woman will vanquish a monster!"

It is also interesting that he was not given a preview of Carrie!  As King says, no one thought to let such a minor creature as the author a screening.

Where's Waldo?

King says he is not really a fan of his own acting, going so far as to say he should have stopped acting at the level of community theater!  Funny.  But he does like to do cameo's in his movies, saying, "I think people kinda like it, it's kinda a Where's Waldo kinda thing."

Black And White:

He takes time to explain why black and white movies are so scary! "When you watch movies from the black and white era, and I'm thinking particularly of the era when Val Lewton worked, you come to an appreciation of how wonderful black and white movies were. The use of shadow --" He points out 1942's "Cat People" as an example. 

King Favorites:

King identifies some of his personal favorite horror movies.  It is no secret that he thinks Bambi is scary!  He also discusses the importance of the 1956 movie "Earth Verses The Flying Saucers" to his own life. 

He spends quite a bit of time explaining the power of "The Night of the Living Dead."  That movie contained for him one of those moments that can't be repeated; where the film gives you a surprise, and in that moment everything changes!  (For me that happened when I first saw The Matrix.)  It is a moment you can't have back, even if you re watch the film. 
"The first time you see night of the living dead. . . you are absolutely riveted.  The second time you're scared.  The third time, the film has lost something essential that it had the first time.  Now, people continue to go back and see Night of the Living Dead, but what they are experiencing is not horror, it is the memory of horror that they felt the first time that they saw it."
His excitement about The Amityville Horror is interesting.  He notes James Brolin's transformation as the film progresses.  What is the cause of Brolin's darkening?  The haunted house!  King does not directly make this connection, but I wonder if there is a sense that Amityville successfully carries out what Kubrick's "The Shining" did not.  King explains, "Kubrick saw the haunting coming from Jack Torrance; where as I always saw it coming from outside."  Now, take Amityville, which shows a normal man who moves in to a haunted house who is then tortured and changed by the ghosts in that house. 

He really liked Dee Wallace in Cujo, and thought she deserved more recognition than she got.  Oh boy, and King really likes the Blair Witch project

King not so favorites:

The Shining: I was glad that King took time to explain a little more exactly what his frustrations with Kubrick's "The Shining" entail.  At the heart of it is a theological disagreement.  Kubrick saw ghosts as a hopeful sign of life after death. In a conversation with Kubrick, King suggested that ghosts may not present the hopeful side of life after death, but they could point toward hell.

King gives the following comparison between the book at the movie: "In my novel, the hotel burns.  In Kubrick's movie, the hotel freezes.  It's the difference between warmth and cold."  He does admit that the images are "striking" though those are surface.  In fact, he describes the movie as a car with no engine.

King also notes that he is not usually moved by werewolf's.  Reason?  Well, the transformation is hard to accept.  (A Twilight dig?  He does say that Twilight is "I was a teenage vampire.").  King also did not find Bella Lugosi particularly frightening as Dracula.  That doesn't mean Lugosi wasn't scary, it just didn't scare King. 

King notes the work of William Castle! Castle was known for using all kinds of gimmicks to hype his films.  Why did Castle need all the gimmicks?  Because, as King points out, his films weren't really all that good.  But, Stephen King points out that Castle was a very talented man and notes his work on Rosemary's Baby.  (see my article on Stephen King and William Castle here)

Dr. Sleep . . .

This documentary had a lot of focus on The Shining.  King points out what beats at the center of The Shining -- Evil spirits want Danny because of Danny's powers.  It seems from the clips and news we've gotten thus far, Dr. Sleep carries this a bit further.  Now there are creatures moving across America, seeking people like Danny. 

So the fear factor is upped a bit because now Danny doesn't have to go to a hotel to encounter the bad spirits they're seeking him out.

It could have been longer:

The New York Times observed, "The frustrating part of the special, though it gets better as it goes along, is that too often it shows just the quickest snippets from films King is referencing. Longer clips would have meant less King, but they would have better illustrated his points." Or, they could have just given the documentary an extra half hour.

My favorite quote: "I never did get behind the idea of the vampire as a love object." Yes! Give is scary vamps!

Stephen King Radio Drama's


The BBC did a dramatazation of Pet Sematary several eyars ago. I listened to it recently with delight -- before I started the never ending journey called Under The Dome. The BBC does a great job, but I would have preferred an American production.
.
As I listened, I was drawn in. Radio was actually a great medium for this novel. Almost better than the big screen -- and I liked the movie. Radio is the theater of the mind.
.
Now think about it -- the number one complaint almost all of us King fans have about the Stephen King movie adaptations is that the special effects are so low budget. (Just check out that warewolf in IT. My parents laughed outloud.) When we see them on the screen, scenes we've read about never match up.
.
Movies SHOW us, while books play to the mind. However, radio rushes to the same spot: The Mind. So, the special effects budget is unlimited. After all, on radio: I've flown with Superman, been to the signing of the U.S. constitution (via a radio program called YOU ARE THERE!), and I've even been to the top of the Empire State building. And every time, it was the most believable thing in the world, because my own mind produced the images.
.
Arch Oboler --
The Stephen King Of His Era
.
A short detour, okay. . .
.
I love old radio. My wife listens to Jack Benny, Burns and Allen and Fibber McGee and Molly. But not me! Give me a chance, and it's Arch Oboler's Lights Out Everybody. This is seriuous stuff. Actually, I can't believe they let these radio plays air! They are all out creepy, scary and wonderful.
.
Oboler was very much like the Stpehen King of his era. He was spooky, gifted, a very good writer and able to generate a seemingly massive output. He also did much more than just horror (like NBC's Arch Obolers Plays). Like Stephen King, he used his art as a medium for polotical commentary -- anti Nazi at the time. He liked to introduce his own plays, kinda like our friend Mr. King likes to write chatty introductions to his books and stories.
.
But anyone who remembers Arch only really remembers how incredibly scared this guy could get us. I mean, sweating shaking scared! And I didn't grow up in a radio generation. I grew up in the 80's! But still, this stuff is the best.
.
Arch Oboler opened Lights Out like this, "This is Arch Oboler bringing you another of our series of stories of the unusual, and once again we caution you: These Lights Out stories are definitely not for the timid soul. So we tell you calmly and very sincerely, if you frighten easily, turn off your radio now." SWEET!
.
King writes, "no discussion of the phenomenon of radio terror, no matter how brief, would be compelte without some mention of the genre's prime auteur -- not Orson Wells, but Arch Oboler, the first playright to have his own national radio series, the chilling Lights Out." (Danse Macabre, 124)
.
I wish Arch was around to turn Stephen King's work into radio plays. King says, "Arch Oboler, a restlessly intelligent man who was also involved in the movies and the legitmate theater, utilized two of radio's great strengths: the first is the mind's innate obedience, its willingness to try to see whatever soemone suggests it see, no matter how absurd; the second is the fact that fear and horror are blinding amotions that knock out our adults pins from beneath us and leave us groping in the dark like children who cannot find the light switch." (danse Macabre, 125-126)
.
A few of my favorite Lights Out Episodes:
The one where everyone disappears, and the couple is at the top of the Empire State Building. I forgot the title, though.
Murder Castle , State Executioner , Sub-basement (there were dinosaurs down there! Reminds me of Graveyard Shift) , Cat People. Forget it! I like them all.
.
The Mist
.
Another Stephen King story turned radio play is The Mist. This was done in 3D sound, and actually was my first introduction to the book. The play follows Kings story pretty closely.
.
George Beahm writes that The Mist "has been optioned and dropped three times -- because the special effects for a movie would be extremely challenging. They are easily manufactured in your mind, which is one of the unique things about either reading, or in particular, listening to that particular story unroll. The special effects that your mind makes are perfect." (The Stephen King Companion, p.275)
.
Beahm also comments specifically on the radio drama, "The Mist is one of King's most visual stories, rich in imagery, best visualized in the mind's eye: skull cinema. With headphones on, the story comes alive, slowly enveloping you ina world where the unbelievable becomes believable. Anyone who has seen the grade-B monster flicks of the fifties will find this dramatization a blast from the past." (Companion, p.131)
.
Star Wars
.
You know, all three of the Star Wars films were turned into radio plays. Interestingly, each one was much short than the previous. Star Wars for the radio? yep! And it worked great. Why? Because of the power of the mind.
.
Now, if they can give us: Star Wars, Murder Castle (Oboler), The Mist and Superman on the radio -- I want to ask: Don't you think radio would be a great venue for Stephen King's work?
.
War Of The Worlds
.
October 30, 1938 Orson Wells scared the entire nation by airing War of the Worlds. How'd he do it? Well, he put his story together as if it were a news cast. Very innovative! And, he whooped every single movie that followed. People drove off the road when they heard on the radio that Martians had landed -- but no one ran out of the theater when they saw it happen on the Big Screen.
.
Why it's such a good medium:
.
King hismelf said in Danse Macabre, "My first experience with real horror came at the hands of Ray Bradbury -- it was an adaptation of his story Mars Is Heaven on Dimension X." (p.120)
.
Radio really works for King's stories for several reasons:
.
1. Radio is a lot more frightening than the movies. You see what they tell you to see.
.
2. Radio plays, like soap operas, can go on episode after eipisode. So please, go ahead, give us a 30 hour edition of The Stand!
.
3. Radio plays can take you right inside someone's head. That's what King is really good at, too. He has the gift of taking you right in a characters thought life. On radio, they do this through monolgues -- and a little bit of echoe. Oboler was the master of the monologue (well, Shakespear was the master of it -- but he didn't write radio plays.)
.
A Few Suggestions:
.
Here are a few of King's stories I think would be great for radio:
.
1. The Stand. Always have to start there! But Larry Underwood in the tunnel would be awesome on radio!
2. Graveyard Shift. Movies can't really take you down into the dark. There always has to be light from somewhere! But radio can drop you down into a dark basement full of rats. Ulgh, I can almost feel them!
3. The Langoleirs. The entire move stunk bad and ruined a great book. But radio could pull this off.
4. Under The Dome. But the audio edition of this is so powerful, it comes close to a radio production. Just the way the reader does the different voices, very good.
5. The Ledge. This was done in Creepshow pretty well, but I think would be even scarier on radio.
6. Eyes of the Dragon.
.
Now what wouldn't work on radio. . . Maximum Overdrive.
.
May I say: Forget the dollar babies. Forget the big budget films. Forget the mini-series and the comics. Why doesn't someone give us a string of truly scary Stephen King radio plays? I'll get the lights. . .
.
Links:
.

Danse Macabre Update




stephenking.com has under their future works page: "Danse MacabreEstimated Release: February, 2010." So what's new?
.
1. A essay titled "What's Scary."
2. It is also being published as in an audio mp3 edition from Brillance read by William Dufris.
.
.

Is Stephen King Typecast?


Albert J. Marro at the Rutland Herald has an article posted about king in Manchester. It's an itneresting story, including some good quotes from King and John Irving.
.
The article ends with this:
.
King ended by taking a poke at his own fame and how well he is and isn't known. He said he had been stopped in an Oregon supermarket by an older woman who told him she recognized him and didn't respect what he did.
.
"I like uplifting things like that 'Shawshank Redemption," she said.
.
King said, 'I wrote that one, too."
.
"No, you didn't!" She said.
.
That's a wonderful example of the prediciment King and his readers find themselves in. It's called typecasting. It's why George Reeves couldn't find a job after playing Superman all those years. Leonard Nemoy got so frustrated with being typecast as mr. Spock that he wrote a book titled, "I am not spock." Adam West was typecast as Batman.
.
Of course, Bela Lugosi only played Count Dracula once -- in the 1931 production of Dracula. But, it stuck, and he was forever stuck witht he spooky image. But don't worry, Lugosi had Ed Wood to save his reputation! (Any Ed Wood fans out there?)
.
Can any of us really watch Tony Shalhoub and not think. . . MONK! Well, we can, can't we. In television and movies I don't think the problem lies so much with the audience as it does producers and casting directors. They don't think we can make the mental shift -- but a good actor causes you to forget his other roles. In fact, my wife was watching Monk the other day and said, "Who is that guy playing the judge? I know I've seen him." And you know, at the moment -- I've forgotten! Because all he was on screen was the Judge, not anothe ractor from another show.
.
Wikipedia notes that "Ted Knight nearly left The Mary Tyler Moore Show because fans typecast him as Ted Baxter; he later played the comic role in Too Close for Comfort."
.
King Typecast -- A Problem For Constant Reader
.Will we return to the dark tower?
For those of us who like Stephen King it can become frustrating that so few people actually understand what he writes. People automatically assume that we are reading something equivalent to literary pornography -- of the horror genre. Just blood and guts, Texas Chainsaw type stuff.
.
King's writing doesn't always match his image. See, even if a book is "horror" there are still other elements that pull it together. Let's take the Shining as an example -- regarded by many as King's most frigthening work. The Shining has some pretty scary scenes! However, it is also a drama as we see the family slowly come apart. It is strong because of it's characters and story -- it's not just a cut-em-up. And that's where people often get King wrong! They assume King only writes slashers -- but I can't think of any he's produced. Now, George Stark might be guilty as charged.
.
Does King Prepetuate His Typecast?
.
Of course he does! Why? Well, for one thing, he does seem to like writing horror. Most of his mainstream books are horror. And, his early work especially is full of scare factor. Carrie, Salem's Lot, The Shining -- one after another caused him to get the Master of Horror image.
.
The genre itself is a fascenation to King, thus the existance of Danse Macabre.
.
Also, the image sells books.
.
But King is also good at breaking out of that mold when he wants to. If anything, I think the typecast challenges him to sometimes break free and do other stuff.
.
A quick list of books that aren't in King's "typecast."
.
1. The Body.
.
2. Shawshank Redemption.
.
3. Breathing Method.
.
4. The Sun Dog. ? More Twilight Zone that vintage "King."
.
5. Gerald's Game
.
6. The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon
.
7. X-Men comic book
.
8. Faithful
.
9. The Dark Tower series.
.
10. The Eyes of the Dragon
.
Now Richard Bachman. . . that dude deserves typecasting!
Is Bart Simpson typecast?
.



Do You ONLY Read Stephen King?

. redrum
Stephen King fans are fiercely loyal. However, some readers choose to only read Stephen King. I think this is somewhat unique to King fans. I don't know many people who only read Tom Clancy. But then, Clancy isn't as prolific as King.
.reDrum
George Beahm mentioned this devotion (to read King only) to author Clive Barker. Beahm pointed out, "When we interviewed Douglas E. Winer at his hoe in upstate Virginia, he commented that at a public gathering with you, you two were discussing your perceptions of the many peole who read tpehn King and your work but who apparently read little else. They have no frame of reference outside your and Kings body of work. That's a very self-limiting eperience." (Stephen King Companion, George Beahm, p.163)
. redrum
So who else is worth reading?
. redrum
Historical drama:
. redrum
I really like Ken Follette's companion books: Pillars of the Earth and World Without End. This is a kind of fiction King isn't going to give his readers. King likes the here and now -- while Ken has the ability to transport you easily to another time and place. One wonderful thing Follette does concerns dialogue. Unlike other novels set in middle ages, he does not use old English. The langauge is easy and the action constant. There are no wasted scenes in his books.
. redrum
Here in America there has never been anyone who really challnged John Steinbeck. In particular The Grapes of Wrath and Of Mice and Men. Steinbeck gives a gritty front row seat to a nasty part of American history.
. redrum
Romance:
.redrum
I don't read romance. My wife is enjoying a book titled, "The Time Travelers Wife." I will refrain from comment. (Oh, I also don't read much Scifi.)
.redrum
Classics:
.redRum
You really can't beat Charles Dickens. In that catagory, King himself recommends Little Dorrit, saying: "His most sentimental, absorbing, delightful novel...and yes, you will like it. Dorrit is as easy to read as any current best-seller, and more rewarding than most. Also, it explains the whole Bernard Madoff mess. If I'm lyin', I'm dyin'." http://www.ew.com/ew/gallery/0,,20278661_5,00.html
.redrum
My favorite Charles Dickens book is Great Expectations. Strong characters and carefully plotted, this novel is Dickens at his best.
.redrum
Legal / Political:
.redrum
Classic John Grisham (Pelican Brief, The Client, The Firm)
.redrum
On the political front, George Orwell's twin books: 1984 and Animal Farm were great.
.redrum
Tom Clancy, so long as I can say: I liked his old stuff. Red October, Red Storm Rising. But when it turned into a Jack Ryan soap opera at a billion pages each, I ducked out.
.redrum
Horror:
.redrum
Might as well make a list for this one. I like the genre.
.redrum
1. Edgar Allen Poe is wonderful. It doesn't matter which story you read, they're all good.
.redrum
2. Richard Lymon is pretty demented. I thnk he's great! One of those guys who just wrote the stuff he wanted to write and didn't care what people said. http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/l/richard-laymon/
.redrum
3. There's Drood, by Dan Simmons. King said this about Drood: "Simmons is always good, but Drood is a masterwork of narrative suspense. It's a story of Egyptian cults, brain-burrowing beetles, life-sucking vampires, and an underground city beneath London...or is it? Maybe it's all in the drug-addled mind of Dickens contemporary Wilkie Collins (The Moonstone), whose poison jealousy of the Inimitable becomes more apparent as the story nibbles its way into the reader's head." http://www.ew.com/ew/gallery/0,,20278661_6,00.html
.redrum
4. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Stephen King explains, "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde was written at white heat by Robert Louis Stevenson in three days. It so horrified his wife that Stevenson burned the manuscript in his fire place. . . and then wrote it again from scratch in another three days." (Danse Macabre, Chapter 3, p.60)
.redrum
5. The Beast Within, Edward Levy is what King's mother would have called "trash." Good trash? No. But it's a delightful read. I read it the first time thinking, "I can't believe they print stuff this bad." Then I bought it hardcover when I lost the paperback. There is something about it that is good trash.
.redrum
Mystery:
.redrum
You really can't beat Aurther Conan Doyal's Sherlock Holmes stories. Why? Because they are sharp, well written and short. Together, they build a common story, but each one stands on its own.
.redrum
Also under mystery, my wife rads Monk.
.redrum
Christian Fiction:
.redrum
This is a genre I avoid at all cost. All the world needs is another Christian Amish Romance book. Gag. I am waiting for the Stephen King version of this genre. Ha! That would be wonderful!
.redrum
My job requires I spend lots, lots of time reading commentaries and other scholarly works on Scripture. Maybe these books are too preachy. Maybe they're just too sappy. Anyway, the Book has enough of everything.
.redrum
Probably the best Christian author is Frank Peretti. He and Ted Decker live on the edge of all out horror. But in general, I stick witht he real thing in this catagory.
.redrum
Commedy:
.redrum
How about Forrest Gump. I'm serious, it was a good book! And a lot of stuff that didn't make it to the screen.
.redrum
Another wonderful commedy / drama is Cold Sassy Tree, by Olive Anne Burns.
.redrum
Books / Authors I want to read, but just haven't:
.ReDRuM
Les Miserables.
.redrum
H.P. Lovecraft.
.redrum
Ernest Hemingway
.redrum
Harlan Ellison -- now who couldn't be interested in an author who had a dust jacket that included the statement that he was "possibly the most contentious person on Earth"
redrum

Stephen King And The Twilight Zone



This year is the 50th anniversary of Rod Serling's, "The Twilight Zone." Because Stephen Kng is a product of American culture, it is interesting to see the shows impact on his work. It is also worth noting that in the 1960's, Serling was as much a part of American culture as King is now.
.
King talks directly about the Twilight Zone in his book Danse Macabre. In particular, The Eye of the Beholder episode. But from reading King, it wasn't any one episode that influenced him, but the entire series. And, perhaps more important, the series eator, Rod Serling.
.
King on the popularity of the Twilight Zone:
.
"That the Twilight one is. . . near immortal is something will not argue with; in big city markets like New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and San Francico it sems to run eternally, hallelujah, world without end, sandwiched into its own twiight zone just after the late evening news and just before the PTL Club. Perhaps only suh anient sitoms as I Love Lucy and My LIttle Margie can compete with the Twilight Zone for that sort of fuzzy, black-and-white, campiristic life which yndication allows." (Danse Macabre, 220)
.
King gives a lot of ink to the Twilight Zone in the chapter of Danse Macabre titled: The Glass Teat.
.
"Of all the dramatic programs which have ever run on American TV, it is the one which comes losest to defying any overall analysis. It was not a western or a cop show (although some of the stories had western formats or featured cops 'n' robbers); it was not really a science fction show (although the Complete Directory to Prime Time Network TV Shows categorizes it as such) not a sitcome (although some episodes were funny); not really ocult (although it did occult stories frequently -- in its peculiar fashion), not really supernatural. It was its own things, and in large part that fact alone seems to account for the fat that a whole generation is able to associate the Serling program witht he budding of the sixties . . . at laest, as the sixties are remembered." (Danse Macabre, 229) See his further comments from on Serling on pages 230-238
.
Richard Matheson's Influence On King:
.
According to the Complete Stephen King Universe (a great book), King was heavily influenced by Richard Matheson, one of the Twilight Zone's key writers.
.
In The Twilight Zone Companion by Marc Zicree, King is quoted as saying, "[Matheson] was the first guy that I ever read who seemed to be doing something that Lovecraft wasn't doing. It wasn't eastern Europe -- the horror could be in the SevenEleven store down the block, or it could be just up the street. Something terrible could be going on even in a G.I. Bill-type ranch development near a college, it could be there as well. And to me, as a kid, that was a revelation, that wax etremely exciting. He was to puttng the horror in places that I could relate to." (p.57)
.
Twilight Zone Episodes Influence On King:
.
Think about it: Could the tite "The Dead Zone" have been at least inspired by "The Twilight Zone." It is certainly a story worthy of the Twilight Zone, isn't it?
.
Paleycenter.org suggests that Christine was influenced by the driverless car from “A Thing About Machines." http://www.paleycenter.org/influencing-stephen-king-star-trek-cindy-sherman-and-more
.
It is worth noting that a writer might have a thought planted from a T.V. show or a conversation, or any number of things. But as they add other ideas, the story becomes their own. And, just for my own notes, I seriously doubt there is a real connection between The Twilight Zone and Christine.
.
If I may. . . I think if the Twilight Zone offered King anything, it was simply the power of a strong ending. Twilight Zone is all about the end. The story builds to a climax, gives a twist, and usually leaves you stunned. King has showed a gift for this same type of twisted ending, a skill perhaps enhanced by his love for the Twilight Zone.
.
King Becomes Part Of The Legend:
.
The admiration doesn't appear to be a one way street. Not only has King spoken of his love for the Twilight Zone -- the Twilight Zone has featured his work in many forms. Of course, the highest Twilight Zone honor is an episode. But there have also been contributions to the Twilight Zone magazine, and interviews. They obviously see that his work is compatable with their genre.
.
In 1985 King's short story from Skeleton Crew, Gramma, was turned into an episode for the New Twilight Zone. Now I don't remember the 1960's. But 1985. . . I was a kid living in Los Angels. The Night Stalker was in our newspapers, Star Wars was all the rage, and the New Twilight Zone wasn't even spoken of. Go figure. And my parents were huge Twilight Zone fans. I guess this series just didn't take off.
.
Twilight Zone Magazine
.

.
April, 1981: The first issue of the Twilight Zone magazine had an interview with Stephen King.
.
June, 1981: The Jaunt was published in Twilight Zone magazine.
.
May, 1982: Several articles on the upcoming Creepshow.
.
July, 1982: King did a review of the movie "The Boogens." (Neverheard of it!)
.
September, 1982: Article on Creepshow
.
November, 1982: King's article appeared "The Evil Dead: Why You Haven't Seen It Yet and Why You Ought To"
.
April, 1983: Twilight Zone magazine had reviews of Creepshow and Different Seasons.
.
June, 1983: Twilight Zone magazine published The Raft.
.
December 1983: Articles on The Dead Zone appeared.
.
Februrary 1984: Articles on Christine.
.
June 1984: Reviews of Christine and Pet Sematary.
.
August 1984: Reviews of Firestarter. (Movie)
.
February 1985: Interview with Stephen King and Peter Straub about their book The Talisman. The cover for ths magazine shows both King and Straub wearing interesting headgear. (Straub looks like an SNL conehead)
.
October, 1985: Has a letter from King to the editor.
.
December 1985: An interview with Stephen King. (By the way, this issue is only $4 on ebay.)
.
February 1986: The Twilight Zone Magazine prints King story, "The Fifth Quarter".
.
December 1986: Interview with Stephen King.
.
February 1987: Twilight Zone magazine review of IT.
.
.
Interesting Links:
.

The Shining and The Twilight Zone, http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-4121-Pop-Culture-News-Examiner~y2009m9d13-The-Shining-and-The-Twilight-Zone
.
Listing of magazines and covers that Stephen King was in. Very well done! http://jerodandlisa.com/king/mags/S-Z/
.

King's bio on the Internet Movie Database includes his Twilight Zone episode, Gramma. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000175/
.
The Twilight Zone's influence On Stephen King, http://www.paleycenter.org/influencing-stephen-king-star-trek-cindy-sherman-and-more
.
Watch more here: http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=3556683

King Speaks On The Cannibals


Stephen King & Robert Louis Stevenson
.
In Danse Macabre, Stephen King notes that Robert Lous Stevenson wrote Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde at a break neck pace -- completing the novel in just three days. However, the book so upset his wife that he burned it in his fireplace! Then, regretting his repentance he wrote it again, from scratch in another three days. (See Dance Macabre, p.60)
.
If that first draft of Dr. Jeckyll and Mr. Hyde existed -- would we want to read it? You bet! We would probably find that the rewrite came out much stronger, but just the same, it would be interesting.
.
The Art Of Darkness
.
It seemed that the Cannibals was lost in Stephen King's fireplace. Only mentioned briefly by Douglas E. Winter in The Art o Darkness -- but for the most part, it was gone. Until King found it (or went looking for it) in his office. He has released the first 60 pages. A rather humble act for an accomplished author! To show his work, warts and all, is pretty bold.
.
Douglas Winter's book was so good that almost every other references just checked back to Winter. The Art of Darkness was a true gift to fans at the time and still. It has proved a lasting source of information. Something King himself admits having referenced recently! Anyway, Stephen King has recently given some more history on the connection between Under the Dome and The Cannibals.
.
King Says. . .
.
King says that he lost the first draft, but the other was written in Pittsburg. Interesting to me that this was during the filming of Creepshow, since you would think he would stop writing to make a movie. But then, if King stopped for each movie -- he would never write again!
.
"I spent two months in a depressing suburban apartment complex," King says, "that became (with the usual fictional tweaks) the setting for the story. It was called The Cannibals, and this time I got a lot further—almost five hundred pages—before hitting a wall. I assumed the manuscript was lost. Long story short, it turned up—battered, and with some pages missing, but mostly complete—in the summer of 2009."
.
John MacDonald Had An Interesting Take
.
At the beginning of Night Shift, John D. MacDonald said that what makes King a great writer is that King has written a "stupendous number of other stories and books and fragments and poems and essays and other unclassified things, most of them too wrtched to ever publish." (Night Shift, introduction).
.
King offers the work simply for amusement, suggesting it be an "appetier" to Under The Dome. For those who enjoy seeing a writers work before rewrites and editors, this should be a treat. MacDonald would remind us that it is this earlier work that made King's soon to be published work strong.
.
A Typewriter?!
.
"I’m amused by the antique quality of the typescript," King admits. "this may have been the last thing I did on my old IBM Selectric before moving on to a computer system." Seems like I remember him saying years ago that he didn't like computers because he felt like his words were under glass. Of course, the computer would go bye bye when he wrote Dreamcatcher by hand.