Showing posts with label Man with a Pan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Man with a Pan. Show all posts

Hitchcock and King sharing the art


Alfred Hitchock was the the master of suspense.  He had the ability to draw you deep into a story, watching every detail with breathless anticipation.  When he was at the top of his game, that is!  Like any artist, some of his work does not holdup.  Stephen King, when he is swinging home runs, also is a master of suspense. I find that stories like Dolores Claiborne and Joyland give me that same level of frantic anticipation that a good Hitchock film does.

I see online a lot essays comparing the two, asking who is the true master of suspense.  That's really subjective, and a little childish.  Not that this blog is beyond childish!  However, they worked in different story telling mediums.  If comparing apples to apples -- King movies verses Hitchcock movies, then the answer is hands down Mr. Hitchcock is the master of suspense.  King's art is with words, and in that realm, he is -- well -- king.

Watching a Hitchcock is a real treat.  In movie like Rear Window, Psycho, Vertigo and The Birds, each scene is like an incredible painting.  Hitchcock didn't like filming on locations because so much was out of his control.  However, some of the most awesome outdoor scenes brought to film are from Mr. Hitchcock.  He would choose every car, and in what order, that would drive by in a scene.  Nothing was left to chance!

It is natural to compare the two.  Though using different mediums, they often use similar approaches.

Limitation:

I got The Alfred Hitchcock collection on Blu Ray the other night.  On the Rear Window DVD, Peter Bogdanovich notes how Hitchcock really liked to limit himself.  In Rear Window, Jimmy Stewart has a broken leg and the entire movie is shot looking out his window!  Rope also takes place in one apartment.  And Lifeboat also is set completely on the boat.  Interesting, as there is little scene change, yet the story is so gripping it holds the viewers interest.

Limitation is an art Stephen King has honed and refined.

Some particular limitations:
1. In Cujo most of the action took place trapped in a car.
2. Gerald's Game cent`ered completely on a woman tied to a bed.  Small efforts -- like trying to get water -- become monumental feats in which the reader roots for her.
3. Susannah in the Dark Tower is crippled.  So is the boy in Silver Bullet.
4. Of course, in Under The Dome the characters are locked together under a giant Dome.  I sure would love it if King went back and finished Cannibals, which was an early attempt at Under The Dome.  In Cannibals, the people were trapped inside an apartment building.  I LOVED the drafts King released.
5. In The Mist the characters are trapped inside a Grocery store.

Cameos.
Not only did Alfred Hitchcock introduce each Hitchcock was known to appear briefly in his own works.  It's kind of fun to spot him!  I think the  most obvious is in The Birds.  Hitchcock did this early because he did not want the audience to spend the entire movie looking for him and miss the  other elements of his story telling.


It is unusual for an author to do Cameo's in their own work, but Stephen King has made quite a few.  Most of the time, it is simply references to his work.  Such is the case in The  Library Policeman.  But in The Dark Tower, King personally appears as himself in The Song of Suzanna.

Ordinary Dangers
In The Birds, Hitchcock took something very ordinary -- birds -- and terrified America.  Before the birds, horror movies usually created monstrosities, such as Frankenstein's monster.  Or, Hollywood was known to take ordinary animals and make them huge, like gigantisized ants.  With the birds, Hitchcock took an ordinary small animal and made it scary.  King does this all the time with rats!

Janet Lea, who took that famous shower in Psycho, said that Hitchcock made it so she could never take a shower again!  After all, think how vulnerable you are in a shower.  (Ask Travis Alexander how dangerous a shower is)  King didn't make the shower dangerous, but he did cause an awful lot  of people to hate clowns.

Here are some ordinary things King has made scary: 1. Cars.  2. Rats.  3. Dogs.  4. Libraries.  5. A Prom.  6. Clowns.  7. Blow torch.  (Misery)

Marriage


Hitchcock's wife Alma was deeply involved in each film he made.  From the work of scripting the story to choosing wardrobe and actors, she had a hand in it.  When Hitchcock recieved the AFI Life Achievement Award, he thanked one person:  Alma.

King has spoken often of the importance of his wife's support and input.  He continues to seek her approval -- even if he might deny it a little.  I like the story King tells of driving with his wife as she sat in the passenger seat reading part of a book.  He asked how it was, and she told him to stop being so needy!

Hitchcock didn't like to spend the evening on the set, but was always home promptly to be with his wife, with whom he often cooked dinner.  King has done his fair share of cooking, and has even contributed to a cookbook titled, "Man with a Pan."

GENRE
Though both deal in the art of suspense,  Hitchcock and King actually deal in very different genres.  King  is quick to use the supernatural as a story telling device.   It is fair to expect ghosts, vampires, possessed cars and even a few haunted houses in a Stephen King story.  In a Hitchcock film there are not ghosts, there are murders and Natzi spies!  But the tension is real  in both.

I discussed in my short essay, What King Book Would Hitchcock Film, a list of stories I thought would suit the famous director.  One person offered  the addition of The Ledge to my list, and I agree wholeheartedly.

Some people, my family included, have seen the use  of supernatural as a weakness in King's writing.  I love it!  From Bag of Bones to IT, the creepy stuff is the best when Stephen King is narrating.

Prolific
Hitchock hosted multiple series, as well as making over fifty feature films.  In fact, as I read The Art of Alfred Hitchock, I'm surprised by just how many of Hitch's films I haven't seen.  There are several I'd like to see.  The Lodger is one, and Under Capricorn is another.  Hitchcock started in the silent era in 1925.

King, likewise, has amassed quite a body of work, and he shows no signs of slowing.

Did you know that there is one film that Alfred Hitchcock filmed twice?  It's The Man Who Knew Too Much.  1934 and then in 1956.  Hitchcock said, "Let's say that the first version was the work of a talented amateur and the second was made by a professional."  Of course, King hasn't produced the same book twice -- exactly.  There was a first attempt at Under The Dome, called Cannibals.  But they are essentially different stories.  But when you look at The Gunslinger and the revision, I think you see two very different stories.  I prefer the revised version.  The same can be true of The Stand, which exists in two distinct versions.  Again, I like the one that was recut and retold.  The storyteller gets better at his craft with each telling.

Though King has never gone back and rewritten a book quite the way Hitchcock returned to The Man Who Knew Too Much, there is a book I wish he would rewrite -- The Tommyknockers.  I find parts of the novel difficult to read, yet the story itself quite engaging.

Years ago, my wife and I went out on a rainy night and watched the remake of Psycho.  As rain poured outside, and the well known story of murder played out on screen, my wife leaned in and said, "This is really scary!"  And it was.  But no one could reproduce what Hitchcock had done, even when trying to translate the film scene  by scene and frame by frame.  Actually, that remake doesn't make any sense to me!  Why did they remake it if they were going to use the same script and direction Hitchcock had  done?  Just to get new actors and do it in color?  Hitchcock did Psycho in black and white because by choice.

FAVORITES!

What's your favorite Hitchcock?  I find I like Hitchcock's later career -- but not the last of the last!  The films of the 60's --  Marnie, Torn Cuartian, Topaz, Frenzy and Family Plot all fail to grab me. My all time favorites are Psycho, Rear Window and Vertigo.
Here's a few of my favorites:
Mr. and Mrs Smith, 1940
Shadow of a Doubt, 1943
Lifeboat, 1944
Spellbound, 1945
Strangers on a Train, 1951 (Which has to be paired with Throw Mamma From The Train)
Dial M for Murder, 1954
Rear Window, 1954
The Man Who Knew Too Much, 1955
Vertigo, 1958
North by Northwest, 1959
Psycho, 1960
The Birds, 1963
And favorite episode of The Alfred Hitchcock Hour is Final Escape.

HITCHCOCK AT Talk Stephen King:
Check out my short article What King Book Would Hitchcock Film?
And Stephen Rebello's article 6 Great Reasons Hitchcock Is Still The Master Of Suspense
And Rebello's youtube discussion of Psycho
And Stephen Rebello's article 5 Things You Didn't Know About Psycho


Stephen King Is Playing With Food -- Again



How much  would you trust Stephen King's taste buds? He did work on a novel titled, "Cannibals."  And gave us the short story "Survivor Type."  What exactly did Pennywise do with Georgie? 

Bon Appétit Magazine posted a fun interview with Stephen King titled, "Master of Horror, Slave to Cheesecake: Stephen King on His Favorite Foods."  

Jonathan Durbin quotes King, ""I'm not a fan of anything slippery or slimy," says King. "I don't eat oysters. It's horrible, the way they slither down your throat alive." 

Be sure to check out the image at the website.  www.bonappetit.com

In 2008 EW printed an article by King titled, "Stephen King's Guide To Movie Snacks."  King advised,
I always start my order with the ritual drink — Diet Pepsi if possible, Coke Zero as a fallback, Diet Coke the court of last resort. A big diet cola sops up the calories and cholesterol contained in movie snack food just like a big old sponge soaks up water. This is a proven fact. One expert (me) believes a medium diet cola drink can lower your cholesterol by 20 points and absorb as much as one thousand empty calories. And if you say that's total crap, I would just point out I don't call it a ritual drink for nothing. Sometimes I add a strawberry smoothie with lots of whipped cream, but I'm always sure to take enough sips of my ritual drink to absolve me of those calories, too.
A while back 
"Spaghetti. Stephen King is spaghetti. Both are probably best enjoyed when you’re young and your tastes are still developing. Nothing spectacular about either and Americans probably consume both more than they should, but every now and then, you just get one of those cravings and nothing else will satisfy it. Banality never tasted so good."  (no-fun-intended.blogspot.com)

Now that was quite helpful!



King contributed to a book about men cooking titled, "Man With A Pan."

In the article, King reveals the reason he does a lot of the cooking in his home is because his wife, Tabitha, has lost a lot of her sense of taste and smell.  The result is a lack of passion for food.  So, King's work in the kitchen is one of necessity!  Does he love to cook?  He makes no such claim.  "I can respect the food even if I"m not especially crazy about cooking it," King says.  He closes the article with the statement, "You can cook stuff people love to eat (always assuming they have a sense of taste) without loving to cook."

The article is wonderful.  The cliff notes:
  • King likes the frying pan a lot!
  • Cooking requires patience.  "Engage in culinary foreplay," King urges as he discusses how frying gets a bad name because people go crazy.
  • The microwave can be your friend.  "I also love the microwave" King says, explaining it's all how you use the thing.  He then gives a quick explanation how to cook a "great fish dish that's beautiful in the microwave."
  • Be gentle.  That theme resonates throughout the article.  Food deserves some respect, so even if cooking is not your pride and joy, don't destroy every ting with fire.

On Cooking



Stephen King has a short article in the 2011cookbook "Man With A Pan."  Well, it's sort of a cookbook.  It has recipes.  But it also has articles.  Kings three page article focuses on why he cooks and some things he considers no-no's in the kitchen.

The reason King does a lot of the cooking in his home is because his wife, Tabitha, has lost a lot of her sense of taste and smell.  The result is a lack of passion for food.  So, King's work in the kitchen is one of some necessity!  Does he love to cook?  He makes no such claim.  "I can respect the food even if I"m not especially crazy about cooking it," King says.  He closes the article with the statement, "You can cook stuff people love to eat (always assuming they have a sense of taste) without loving to cook."

The article is wonderful.  The cliff notes:
  • King likes the frying pan a lot!
  • Cooking requires patience.  "Engage in culinary foreplay," King urges as he discusses how frying gets a bad name because people go crazy.
  • The microwave can be your friend.  "I also love the microwave" King says, explaining it's all how you use the thing.  He then gives a quick explanation how to cook a "great fish dish that's beautiful in the microwave."
  • Be gentle.  That theme resonates throughout the article.  Food deserves some respect, so even if cooking is not your pride and joy, don't destroy every ting with fire.
About the book, editor John Donohue says,
It was very important for me to include a broad cross section of men who cook for their families in the book," Donohue says. "I wanted the well crafted essays by professional writers, but I also wanted to hear from other working fathers, ones who might have more demanding jobs than being a successful writer. It's one thing to make your own hours, it's another to have to be on the job as a fireman, a bond trader, a carpenter, an economist, and still get food on the table. I wanted the book to be an inspiration to men of all professional stripes."
Man with a Pan can be purchased HERE.  The book is also available on Kindle.