Showing posts with label Song of Susanna. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Song of Susanna. Show all posts

Hitchcock and King sharing the art


Alfred Hitchock was the the master of suspense.  He had the ability to draw you deep into a story, watching every detail with breathless anticipation.  When he was at the top of his game, that is!  Like any artist, some of his work does not holdup.  Stephen King, when he is swinging home runs, also is a master of suspense. I find that stories like Dolores Claiborne and Joyland give me that same level of frantic anticipation that a good Hitchock film does.

I see online a lot essays comparing the two, asking who is the true master of suspense.  That's really subjective, and a little childish.  Not that this blog is beyond childish!  However, they worked in different story telling mediums.  If comparing apples to apples -- King movies verses Hitchcock movies, then the answer is hands down Mr. Hitchcock is the master of suspense.  King's art is with words, and in that realm, he is -- well -- king.

Watching a Hitchcock is a real treat.  In movie like Rear Window, Psycho, Vertigo and The Birds, each scene is like an incredible painting.  Hitchcock didn't like filming on locations because so much was out of his control.  However, some of the most awesome outdoor scenes brought to film are from Mr. Hitchcock.  He would choose every car, and in what order, that would drive by in a scene.  Nothing was left to chance!

It is natural to compare the two.  Though using different mediums, they often use similar approaches.

Limitation:

I got The Alfred Hitchcock collection on Blu Ray the other night.  On the Rear Window DVD, Peter Bogdanovich notes how Hitchcock really liked to limit himself.  In Rear Window, Jimmy Stewart has a broken leg and the entire movie is shot looking out his window!  Rope also takes place in one apartment.  And Lifeboat also is set completely on the boat.  Interesting, as there is little scene change, yet the story is so gripping it holds the viewers interest.

Limitation is an art Stephen King has honed and refined.

Some particular limitations:
1. In Cujo most of the action took place trapped in a car.
2. Gerald's Game cent`ered completely on a woman tied to a bed.  Small efforts -- like trying to get water -- become monumental feats in which the reader roots for her.
3. Susannah in the Dark Tower is crippled.  So is the boy in Silver Bullet.
4. Of course, in Under The Dome the characters are locked together under a giant Dome.  I sure would love it if King went back and finished Cannibals, which was an early attempt at Under The Dome.  In Cannibals, the people were trapped inside an apartment building.  I LOVED the drafts King released.
5. In The Mist the characters are trapped inside a Grocery store.

Cameos.
Not only did Alfred Hitchcock introduce each Hitchcock was known to appear briefly in his own works.  It's kind of fun to spot him!  I think the  most obvious is in The Birds.  Hitchcock did this early because he did not want the audience to spend the entire movie looking for him and miss the  other elements of his story telling.


It is unusual for an author to do Cameo's in their own work, but Stephen King has made quite a few.  Most of the time, it is simply references to his work.  Such is the case in The  Library Policeman.  But in The Dark Tower, King personally appears as himself in The Song of Suzanna.

Ordinary Dangers
In The Birds, Hitchcock took something very ordinary -- birds -- and terrified America.  Before the birds, horror movies usually created monstrosities, such as Frankenstein's monster.  Or, Hollywood was known to take ordinary animals and make them huge, like gigantisized ants.  With the birds, Hitchcock took an ordinary small animal and made it scary.  King does this all the time with rats!

Janet Lea, who took that famous shower in Psycho, said that Hitchcock made it so she could never take a shower again!  After all, think how vulnerable you are in a shower.  (Ask Travis Alexander how dangerous a shower is)  King didn't make the shower dangerous, but he did cause an awful lot  of people to hate clowns.

Here are some ordinary things King has made scary: 1. Cars.  2. Rats.  3. Dogs.  4. Libraries.  5. A Prom.  6. Clowns.  7. Blow torch.  (Misery)

Marriage


Hitchcock's wife Alma was deeply involved in each film he made.  From the work of scripting the story to choosing wardrobe and actors, she had a hand in it.  When Hitchcock recieved the AFI Life Achievement Award, he thanked one person:  Alma.

King has spoken often of the importance of his wife's support and input.  He continues to seek her approval -- even if he might deny it a little.  I like the story King tells of driving with his wife as she sat in the passenger seat reading part of a book.  He asked how it was, and she told him to stop being so needy!

Hitchcock didn't like to spend the evening on the set, but was always home promptly to be with his wife, with whom he often cooked dinner.  King has done his fair share of cooking, and has even contributed to a cookbook titled, "Man with a Pan."

GENRE
Though both deal in the art of suspense,  Hitchcock and King actually deal in very different genres.  King  is quick to use the supernatural as a story telling device.   It is fair to expect ghosts, vampires, possessed cars and even a few haunted houses in a Stephen King story.  In a Hitchcock film there are not ghosts, there are murders and Natzi spies!  But the tension is real  in both.

I discussed in my short essay, What King Book Would Hitchcock Film, a list of stories I thought would suit the famous director.  One person offered  the addition of The Ledge to my list, and I agree wholeheartedly.

Some people, my family included, have seen the use  of supernatural as a weakness in King's writing.  I love it!  From Bag of Bones to IT, the creepy stuff is the best when Stephen King is narrating.

Prolific
Hitchock hosted multiple series, as well as making over fifty feature films.  In fact, as I read The Art of Alfred Hitchock, I'm surprised by just how many of Hitch's films I haven't seen.  There are several I'd like to see.  The Lodger is one, and Under Capricorn is another.  Hitchcock started in the silent era in 1925.

King, likewise, has amassed quite a body of work, and he shows no signs of slowing.

Did you know that there is one film that Alfred Hitchcock filmed twice?  It's The Man Who Knew Too Much.  1934 and then in 1956.  Hitchcock said, "Let's say that the first version was the work of a talented amateur and the second was made by a professional."  Of course, King hasn't produced the same book twice -- exactly.  There was a first attempt at Under The Dome, called Cannibals.  But they are essentially different stories.  But when you look at The Gunslinger and the revision, I think you see two very different stories.  I prefer the revised version.  The same can be true of The Stand, which exists in two distinct versions.  Again, I like the one that was recut and retold.  The storyteller gets better at his craft with each telling.

Though King has never gone back and rewritten a book quite the way Hitchcock returned to The Man Who Knew Too Much, there is a book I wish he would rewrite -- The Tommyknockers.  I find parts of the novel difficult to read, yet the story itself quite engaging.

Years ago, my wife and I went out on a rainy night and watched the remake of Psycho.  As rain poured outside, and the well known story of murder played out on screen, my wife leaned in and said, "This is really scary!"  And it was.  But no one could reproduce what Hitchcock had done, even when trying to translate the film scene  by scene and frame by frame.  Actually, that remake doesn't make any sense to me!  Why did they remake it if they were going to use the same script and direction Hitchcock had  done?  Just to get new actors and do it in color?  Hitchcock did Psycho in black and white because by choice.

FAVORITES!

What's your favorite Hitchcock?  I find I like Hitchcock's later career -- but not the last of the last!  The films of the 60's --  Marnie, Torn Cuartian, Topaz, Frenzy and Family Plot all fail to grab me. My all time favorites are Psycho, Rear Window and Vertigo.
Here's a few of my favorites:
Mr. and Mrs Smith, 1940
Shadow of a Doubt, 1943
Lifeboat, 1944
Spellbound, 1945
Strangers on a Train, 1951 (Which has to be paired with Throw Mamma From The Train)
Dial M for Murder, 1954
Rear Window, 1954
The Man Who Knew Too Much, 1955
Vertigo, 1958
North by Northwest, 1959
Psycho, 1960
The Birds, 1963
And favorite episode of The Alfred Hitchcock Hour is Final Escape.

HITCHCOCK AT Talk Stephen King:
Check out my short article What King Book Would Hitchcock Film?
And Stephen Rebello's article 6 Great Reasons Hitchcock Is Still The Master Of Suspense
And Rebello's youtube discussion of Psycho
And Stephen Rebello's article 5 Things You Didn't Know About Psycho


9-11 And The Dark Tower


[repost, 9/11/09]
.
In The Song of Susanna, King’s own life becomes intertwined with the novel itself. Roland meets his creator – and, delightfully, doesn’t like him much! It was here that King began to draw all things together – tightly. No more hinting around, he was ready to begin tightening the screws.
.
3 things were brought together: King’s own life, current/recent history, and the Dark Tower itself.
.
King not only writes himself into the novel, he moves events from his life into the flow of the fictional story. This leaves no room for reality and fiction – King has become a part of his own work. He is a character. I heard Tom Nelson say that at the incarnation (when God became flesh) that God wrote himself into our story. The author became a part of the narrative and moved among the characters. Of course, in Song of Susanna, King becomes incarnate in the novel. The terrible car accident and other actual events of King’s life become part of the book.
.
Something else rather striking happens: King moves pieces of American history into the book. Now we all are a part of the Dark Tower – in the since that we were all part of 9/11. Certainly those killed were most directly impacted, but the nation and world as a whole shared in the experience. And so the nation and the world are invited into the Dark Tower to imagine a twist. What if the villains in the Dark Tower played a role in the destruction of the Twin Towers?
.
No longer did the Dark Tower simply loom over Roland – it loomed over all of us.
.
It is under the World Trade Center that Black Thirteen is hidden. Bev Vincent explains it this way: "The idea is that Black 13 will be buried at the bottom of tons of rubble and will therefore be out of anyone's reach. As Callahan says, "one glass ball under a hundred and ten stories of concrete and steel? Even a glass ball filled with deep magic? That'd be one way to take care of the nasty thing, I guess."
.
Steven Wu of Steven Wu’s book reviews, says: "And have I mentioned an extremely tasteless reference to 9/11, where King suggests that the terrorist attacks were just an attempt by his villains to destroy a fictional artifact of great value to them?"
.
This is an interesting review, since I remember reading Song of Susannah with a sense of breathless glee. We – all of us – had been drawn into the plot. King, me, you, everyone was now a part of this book. I wasn’t offended that King used fiction to draw us in.

Best Dark Tower Books


A friend gave me two books: The Stand and The Dark Tower. I started the Dark Tower, The Gunslinger but quickly decided I would do better reading about the end of the world. I ate the Stand up that summer and then difted to new King novels. The Gunslinger would have to wait until I could dig through it with an audio edition. Finally I did read it -- and still didn't get it. "Don't you see," a highschool friend said, "they're in hell." A neat idea, but I was pretty sure that wasn't "it." What was up with this book?
.
I remember disappointment as Roland climbed the mountain only for the book to end in a long talk. A long talk! Come on!
.
I would have given up on the series -- truly -- but for the Drawing of the Three. Something called me back to the Dark Tower series. Was it King's own energy for this? Did I sense that something both dark and wonderful was going to happen in these books? The weight of the first book lifted in Drawing of the Three, and King's joyful story telling style returned. I loved it as Roland popped between world's through doors. There he was one moment in the world I knew, and then dropping back to another era in America. It was great when Eddie hid his drugs in Roland's world. The gangsters, the doors, the woman in the wheelchair. . . oh, and those things that attacked Roland on the beach (did-a-chick) were all great! Maybe, I considered, this series wasn't destined to be a total flop. I still didn't get it, but it made a connection.
.
The Wastelands reminded me very much of Star Trek's "The Search For Spock." Only, this was: The Search For Jake. Sorry, it just seemed that King wanted to redeem himself on this one and help Roland not look so bad. Again, there was bouncing between worlds, a fight with a huge bear, encounter a Nazi airplane, Randall Flagg -- and then the true plot twisting begins! The Tick Tock Man, Blane -- it's the kind of book that as you read it you think: Wow, this is good! But to be honest, the storyline isn't so unique it sticks to you. I would have to read it a fourth or fifth time to really nail down all the details. But I remember it was complicated and did very much progress the story.
.
And then. . . Mr. King stopped writing the Dark Tower for a while. I went off to College, got a job, got married. . . and then Wizard and Glass came out. I was really excited about this one but I just couldn't make it. I'm almost ashamed of that, but I just couldn't. There was true joy in realizing that for a brief period of time they were moving through the world of the Stand. But then, as things dipped into a back-story, I drifted off. My wife read the book and loved it. "Ruby slippers," she told me, "it's got all kinds of ties to the Wizard of Oz." Uh-huh! So that's supposed to tempt me? I'll just wait for the next book and read the argument, I decided. (This was before the internet really superly took off).
.
Right. . . wait for the next book. Years dripped by, but there was no next book. And the way the series had been going, it kind of seemed okay to me.
.
Then Mr. King had a bad car accident, got run over by a drunk -- and it looked like the Dark Tower was going to be a bust. Surely publishers wouldn't just let it die, they would do what publishers did with V.C. Andrews, just hire someone who writes like the author. But who writes like Stephen King?
.
Thankfully Stephen King did not die. In fact, he came out of recovery and handed his fans a wonderful gift called: "Dreamcatcher." And soon there was an anouncement from King: He would finish all three remaining books one after another.
.
The return to Roland's world was well worth it! I loved Wolves of the Calla! The idea of a town standing up for itself was indeed a page turner. The characters were developed, the plot moved, and even the old west feel, which hadn't really been present since The Gun Slinger, was back. I loved the final fight scene as plates whirred through the air and the gunslingers took their stand along with the townspeople. Brilliantly executed! It was the kind of book that made me shout outloud, "YEAH!" For once Roland wasn't just focused on his stupid tower, but was being what a gunslinger ought to be: A warrior for the oppressed. I loved it.
.
Right on the heels of this came Song of Susannah. Tightly written, if not sometiems confusing it certainly had its moments. The gunslinger meets Stephen King?! Three Stephen Kings! Nice. And, it all happens in a single day. It took me a while to realize that small point.
.
King concluded the series with massive novel The Dark Tower. In it we find redemption for a certain priest and new obsticals along the path. To be honest, I was in such a hurry to get to the Dark Tower, I found myself zoning out as plot rolled by. That, and I was delayed when my wife had a car accident and totalled the car -- which had my Dark Tower CD's. But at last I had to finish. As the magic day came, King gave fair notice: Don't feel obligated to read on. Make up your own ending. Yeah, right! I paid good money for this! "You're not going to like it," my wife warned. What does she know! Well, turns out she knows a lot. What?! The world is coming apart, only the dark tower can save everything -- and it ends where it began?
.
So, here's my question: If the series ends where it began, if I read it again, will it still end there? Is that where it goes everytime, or just this time?
.
It was an enjoyable journey. Far better than Lord of the Rings in my opinion. And, easily the best two in the series were Drawing of the Three, which re-engaged me in the series, and Wolves of the Calla, which again re-engaged me in Roland's quest. Of course, the journey is not over. This time you can take the journey via comic book. I'm not taking that journey, so please, anyone want to tell me if it comes out any different?.