Showing posts with label Fearnet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fearnet. Show all posts
Fearnet: The Horror Community's Best April Fools Pranks
Check out John Squires list of best pranks the horror community played on us this April fools.
About King: Over on his official website, Stephen King got in on the April Fools' fun by teasing that he was writing a sequel to Christine, titled Christine Lives. 'Christine Lives picks up where Christine left off,' wrote King, 'and follows the trials and tribulations of Dennis' descent from school teacher to carnival barker as he attempts to evade the smoking tires of fate.' The announcement included a link to a video of King's announcement, which was actually a video of Rick Astley's 'Never Gonna Give You Up,' in disguise. Rick-rolled by the King... a true honor!
Check out the full article at: www.fearnet.com
Christine Lmited Edition
Kevin Quigley has posted a great article celebrating the Limited Edition of Christine. He rightly assesses that Christine is not exactly a favorite among King fans. Quoting Michael R. Collings, it's a "minor" novel. However, Quigley makes the argument that Christine is actually "underrated."
So what's to love in Christine? Actually, I do love this book! It's great. It is simply not KIng's absolute best. It's hard to get an A- when you're an A+ student. I found the book engaging, very scary, and insightful about teen love. It's a young peoples novel about high school, ullies and even a touch of rock.
Quigley shares this interesting bit of news:
Now, then, seems the perfect time to celebrate the quietly enduring legacy of one of Stephen King’s most underrated novels. Enter PS Publishing, a premier British small press specializing in fine editions of genre work. PS first came on the King scene with the 2007 limited hardcover release of The Colorado Kid, initially released as a mass-market original through Hard Case Crime. The aesthetics of that book impressed fans: PS commissioned work from three different genre artists to create three unique hardcover versions of King’s slim novel, with new covers and new interior art, and all the whistles and bells of a fine limited edition.Quigley gives his usual detailed analysis of the new book, and most exciting to me, announcs that the book includes two new essays. "Richard Chizmar, of Cemetery Dance Publications, provides a short, moving essay about his personal experiences with the novel, recalling his recent afterword in the Cemetery Dance anthology Turn Down the Lights. Michael Marshall Smith (We Are Here, Spares) contributes a lengthy, insightful foreword, bringing to the fore the novel’s major themes of growing up and growing apart."
The full article is at fearnet.com
Under The Dome Comes To Paperback In Two Volumes
Under The Dome has finally come to paperback in a normal size. By normal, I mean it's not the large, oversized paperbacks recently popularized. So how do you get Under The Dome in paperback without the massive tome falling apart before your finish? It's being released in two parts.
Now this makes me wonder -- why? The Stand was a longer novel and was released in one single volume that was not oversized. Of course, my copy quickly wore out in a single reading, but I did make it to the end. I've never been a fan of books in multiple volumes. What's more, while Under the Dome is long, it's not two thousand pages.
The book is selling at Books a Million for a little over $8 for each part. So that's $16 for a paperback edition of Under The Dome.
So what's going on with the paperback version of Under The Dome? That's a question Kevin Quigley (CharnelHouseSK.com) jumped on in his January 10 article at Fearnet. As always, Quigley's article is wonderful. He even explains why paperbacks got taller. Turns out, the people who read paperbacks are getting older! Quigley also discuses changes Scribner has made in their approach to King's book cover designs.
Here's a snippet from Quigley's article, explaining Under The Dome's long road to paperback publication:
While previous mega-long bestsellers like It and The Stand fit easily in regular mass-market editions, the split and staggered release of the Under the Dome mass-markets makes sense for today’s market. With the new “easier to read” edict for the 7.5” paperbacks, these books are also easier to hold – at nearly 1,300 combined pages, a single paperback might actually turn off potential new readers. Setting the release dates of the two paperbacks a month apart also keeps these new readers in mind, especially those who enjoy the serialized storytelling of the show and might be eager to replicate the experience. New American Library did the same with Desperation and The Regulators in 1997: though the books – which tell different stories with the same characters – came out on the same day in hardcover, in paperback, Desperation came out a month earlier than its altered twin.It's an interesting approach Scribner is taking. Of course, it makes me wonder if people will really read half the novel, then wait for the other half to come out. Don't they know they can buy the whole thing? Would you go to Burger King and buy half a Whopper, eat it slowly, then buy the other half? Even if it's big, you want the whole thing.
Qigley notes that "For the first time, Under the Dome will be available in every existing format--" Which actually is exciting. In fact, I'm willing to buy a volume 3 if King would give us more.
Kevin Quigley's article, The Long Road to 'Under the Dome' in Paperback, can be found at fearnet.com
Check out my recent discussion with Quigley about all things related to The Mist at talkstephenking interview-with-kevin-quigley
Interview With Kevin Quigley: What's Up With Frank Muller's Reading Of THE MIST
I am a fan of The Mist. I think it's a great story. It's also been adapted many, many times. By far, one of the things I've gotten the most questions about over the years of blogging is about the Frank Muller reading of the Mist. Where is it? Curious myself, I went to the best source I know of, Kevin Quigley. Quigley is the keeper of the King website Charnel House and a contributor to fearnet.
Okay, let's talk about the Mist and all things Stephen King!
Talk Stephen King: Hey, I’m really excited to talk about the Mist with you. I loved your book, Blood In Your Ears, in which you discuss the audio version of The Mist. What do you think of the story itself?
Kevin Quigley: “The Mist” is one of my favorite King stories. Quite a lot of King’s novella work stands as his strongest material – see also “Secret Window, Secret Garden,” “Apt Pupil,” “The Body,” “A Good Marriage,” “The Langoliers.” It’s got the punchiness of a short story but you get character development and multiple show sequences like in a novel. I also really loved the open ending. King returned to that stylistic concept later in his career – with From a Buick 8, Cell, and The Colorado Kid – which pissed a lot of people off, for some reason. I love ambiguity.
TSK: I loved the movie. It seemed to successfully capture the tone of the novella. What did you think of the film?
KQ: Most of the movie is terrific. You’re right about the tone – it perfectly captures the 50s monster-movie feel, while also delivering on contemporary characters and scares.
TSK: The novella left the story open ended. The movie, however, chose an ending scene that was rather controversial. King said he liked it. I hate it. Which of us is right?
KQ: King and I often disagree about movies. The ending of The Mist is atrocious. It’s going for shock value and succeeding at that, but it doesn’t do much for the film itself. It’s a complete shift in tone and intent, one that feels incongruous with the rest of the movie.
TSK: The audio 3D version of the Mist was awesome. It seems to have been commercially successful. Do you think that format will be utilized for King stories again?
KQ: Well, there have been other King dramatizations. There’s one for Misery and Pet Sematary, one for ’Salem’s Lot. Most are unsuccessful, I think in part because they’re unable to reimagine the work from the ground up. King’s cinematic sequences in his novels work because he’s terrific at describing scenes with punch, but much of that works on the page, where exposition and imagination holds sway. It’s the reason why so much of King’s filmed adaptations work less often than they should.
I also think, though, that a number of King’s more plot- and situation-driven work could benefit. I’d love to hear an adaptation of “The Langoliers,” for instance. I think “The Breathing Method” would work very well, and maybe “Big Driver” and “The House on Maple Street.” For novels, I think they could really kill The Regulators.
TSK: One of the things people ask me about is the Recorded Books 3 tape set read by Frank Muller. In your book, Blood In Your Ears, you pointed out that this was out of print. What exactly does that mean? That seems crazy in the King world! Nothing goes out of print. Is there a copyright problem or something that you know of?
KQ: King’s novels don’t go out of print, but versions sometimes do. For example, when was the last time you saw a copy of The Dead Zone with the movie cover? Same with audio books. Sometimes they make a new version that they deem is “better,” and the old one goes away.
Skeleton Crew is a frustrating instance, because a perfectly terrific version of Skeleton Crew on audio simply doesn’t exist anymore. The collection Skeleton Crew: Selections is the only version available on audio, which is insane. Sure, the narrators are fine – King reads “The Raft,” and it’s awesome – but there are only four stories. Why let the terrific Frank Muller version rot in purgatory?
TSK: One fan emailed to tell me that Recorded Books told them that they no longer held the copyright, that it had gone to Muller’s estate. Any way to verify that? Do readers actually own the work?
KQ: As far as I can tell, readers do not own the work at all. From what I understand, the author of the work retains all copyrights to the book. An audiobook is one way of “copying” the book, so a person can’t replicate the work without permission from the author. It’s not that different from a publisher doing a limited edition work; the limited edition doesn’t become that publisher’s book just because they manufactured it.
TSK: Do you think that with everything going digital that there is a chance a publisher like Audible might pick it up?
KQ: Well, Audible doesn’t generally publish professional books themselves – they’re more a distributor for established publishers’ audio arms, or publishers like Recorded Books – but they do have a healthy business in amateur recording. But I get your point, and I hope they’ll do right by Skeleton Crew. In 2010, there was an audio onslaught of King books that had only previously been available as Library of Congress recordings. Penguin brought out new, professional recordings of Christine, Firestarter, Cujo, Danse Macabre, The Eyes of the Dragon, It, and all the early Bachman novels except Rage: The Long Walk, Roadwork, and The Running Man. Soon after, Random House released the mammoth recording of The Stand – over 47 hours! – read by Grover Gardner.
At current, the only full Stephen King books you can’t get on audio are Pet Sematary and Skeleton Crew. I am assuming that Sematary is tied up in rights issues, but I don’t know about Skeleton Crew. And unfortunately, while there are terrific unabridged versions of The Regulators read by Frank Muller and Desperation read by King himself, those were only available to libraries. The commercial versions – not-bad recordings by Kate Nelligan and Kathy Bates – are fine, but horribly abridged.
TSK: Have you heard the Muller reading? What did you think?
KQ: I have, and it’s terrific! As assured and sonorous as his later recordings.
TSK: Any new projects we can be expecting?
KQ: Well, we can reasonably expect new audiobooks of Mr. Mercedes and Revival coming this year, but King has also been pretty liberal with audiobooks of his short stories lately, so we might see more of those popping up. I’d love to see the unabridged recordings of Desperation and The Regulators, and of course Pet Sematary make it to Audible soon. I’ve been on a King audio kick lately – The Dark Half, Misery, and Christine in rapid succession – and I want more.
TSK: Okay, some quick fire questions while I have you here. Answer like it’s gunfire. . .
TSK: What did you think of:. . .
–Carrie remake? Not bad, but too close to the original.
–Doctor Sleep? Pretty good, but I was far more involved in the characters than the plot, and wanted more of Danny and Abra than the True Knot.
–Joyland? One of King’s best books of the last decade.
–Under The Dome television? I watched the first half of the season, then lost the thread. That might have more to my schedule than the show, though.
TSK: Which is better,
--Joyland or Doctor Sleep? Joyland!
–Carrie or Carrie 2013? Original!
–Doctor Sleep or The Shining? The Shining!
–Wetware or Blood In Your Ears? My babies! I took a little longer with Blood in Your Ears and I like the finished product a little better.
–Ink in the Veins or Chart Of Darkness? Chart of Darkness. I love Ink in the Veins, but Chart of Darkness was a passion project, AND my first book for Cemetery Dance.
–Haven or Under The Dome? Under the Dome!
TSK: Do you have a novel?
KQ: Yes! Cemetery Dance is releasing I’m On Fire this year as an ebook. But I also have 18 other novels waiting in the wings. Most aren’t horror, which is why I’ve had some issue with placing them, but you might be seeing more of them sooner rather than later. The book I’m working on now is a coming of age story called Roller Disco Saturday Night!
TSK: Thanks Kevin.
KQ: Thanks!
--
Kevin Quigley is author of I'm On Fire, Stephen King Limited, and Roller Disco Saturday Night
Producer and Host of Johnny D's Comedy. He is a Columnist at FEARnet.com
Quigley Gives Us A Glimpse Of The King Universe 2014
Check out Kevin Quigley's article, "Overlooking 2014: Stephen King in the New Year" at www.fearnet.com. Quigley doesn't claim to write with any authority -- but I will point out that I found the article following a link suggested by Stephen King's official facebook page. So -- someone over there thinks Quigley is right on.
Check out Quigley's website at CharnelHouseSK.com
And see my interview with him at talkstephenking Quigley Interview
Here's some highlights -- the article is much better!
We can expect Mr. Mercedes on June 3rd, 2014. Quigley notes: "It's rare for King to release novels in the summer – before 2013, the last non-series hardcover written under his own name to arrive in the summer was Rose Madder, way back in 1995 – but the unqualified success of this summer's Joyland must have been encouraging."
Quigley sees Mr. Mercedes being potentially in tune with the likes of Full Dark, No Stars and Blockade Billy. "It’s fascinating to watch King work his noir out – a little less Clive Barker, a little more Lawrence Block – and to see King challenge expectations while still delivering an exciting story."
We can also expect a film adaptation of "A Good Marriage," which Quigley says has been completed.
On December 10th, King tweeted, “Have seen the completed film version of A GOOD MARRIAGE. I thought it was terrific. Of course… I wrote it!”
And, there is the upcoming novel Revival, though almost nothing is known about it. Quigley quotes King's July 18th comments to columist Colin McEncore,
"The main character [of Revival] is a kid who learns how to play guitar, and I can relate to this guy because he's not terribly good. He's just good enough to catch on with a number of bands and play for a lot of years. The song that he learns to play first is the song that I learned to play first, which was 'Cherry, Cherry' by Neil Diamond. One of the great rock progressions: E-A-D-A.
What seems really important from the fearnet article is Quigley's observation that just because we only now of two novels on the horizon, don't think that means King doesn't have more up his sleeve. He also notes, as others have recently, that we are "overdue" for a short story collection. Quigley offers this possible list of stories (see the article.)
And see my interview with him at talkstephenking Quigley Interview
Bev Vincent Hones In On YOU CAN'T KILL STEPHEN KING
Have you seen "You Can't Kill Stephen King" yet? Yeah -- me either. It seems the entire planet will get a peek before we lowly Americans. To help those of us who just can't seem to get a copy, Bev Vincent has posted a great review at Fearnet.
My favorite quotes:
- I was pleasantly surprised. A Return to Salem’s Lot is a bad film. Creepshow 3 is a terrible film. You Can’t Kill Stephen King is fun.
- The movie is littered with other King references, including: a disturbingly creepy clown (some things can never be un-seen); a boat named Christine; characters named Pangborn, Verrill, Dodd and Bachman; a host of quoted dialog from and references to Kubrick’s The Shining (Ronnie is reading the novel); and a tattoo in the shape of the Crimson King’s all-seeing eye.
- You Can’t Kill Stephen King has a wry sense of humor and it does an especially good job of building up false tension by relying on horror movie expectations.
QUIGLEY review of Darkman
Fearnet.com has posted Kevin Quigley's review of "The Dark Man." I always look forward to his reviews! Quigley has an understanding of not only the vast King universe, but the writer himself that is rare.
Quigley writes with enthusiasm for the poem, "When it comes down to it, the work itself is always the most important aspect. It’s good work. Exciting work. No comforting rhymes. No shards of light. It’s the direct precursor to Paranoid, King’s most disturbing collected poem to date. You don’t have to be a collector or a poetry major to love The Dark Man. You just have to like being scared."
Quigley's review is at fearnet.com
Quigley Reviews JOYLAND
Okay, I'm really excited about Joyland! Really excited. See, here's the deal -- I've been so focused on Doctor Sleep, all my "Stephen King emotional energy reserves" have been given to anticipating its release. Joyland is there. . . but I've been unsure exactly what to make of it. What is it? A mystery novel? A horror novel? Is it the Colorado Kid? I was recently assured that it is not Colorado Kid! But. . . what IS Joyland?
Kevin Quigley has released the first review I've seen of Joyland at www.fearnet.com. Quigley compares the novel to such early works as The Dead Zone, The Shining and Salem's Lot. Now that's red meat for any Stephen King fan.
Quigley writes, "It’s good to have a book like this now – simple, sweet, and not a little scary – to remind us that among the prequels and sequels, the epics and the TV miniseries, Stephen King can still spin one hell of a little yarn."
Here's what's nice -- Quigley knows his Stephen King. This isn't someone inside the business telling us this is a strong novel, it's the author of numerous books about King and the keeper of the King website, CharnelHouseSK.com.
Go read the full review, it's great. www.fearnet.com
check out my interview iwth Kevin Quigley at; talkstephenking.blogspot.com
Quigley talks GUNS
I enjoyed Kevin Quigley's review of GUNS at Fearnet. Quigley is the administrator of charnelhousesk.
Quigley notes, "Guns” is a smart, important essay that works hard at using common sense as a tool for discussion. He doesn’t vilify gun owners – somewhat surprisingly, he is one – and he doesn’t believe in quick, token solutions."
If you like the review, hit "Like" on the FEARnet page!
Quigley's review is at www.fearnet.com
Quigley notes, "Guns” is a smart, important essay that works hard at using common sense as a tool for discussion. He doesn’t vilify gun owners – somewhat surprisingly, he is one – and he doesn’t believe in quick, token solutions."
If you like the review, hit "Like" on the FEARnet page!
Quigley's review is at www.fearnet.com
Carrie: The Mother Of All Prom Horror Flicks
I enjoyed Brian Truitt's USA Today article, titled, “Horror films squeeze the life out of proms.”
What King story could have come to Mr.Truitt’s mind as he penned this article? Perhaps. . . CARRIE?!
Truitt cites Scott Weinberg from FEARnet.com as saying that the prom is an ideal backdrop for horror movies, and that it is “surprising that more movies haven't mined the theme.” More movies haven’t mined the theme? Well, Carrie alone has mined the theme! She’s stayed at it with adaptations in the 70's, 80's, 90's and right past Y2K (remember that?) to the present day – she’s still mining the theme!
Carrie gets around. Let’s see, just off the top of my head, Carrie has been:
- A book
- A movie
- A TV movie
- A Broadway musical
- A play
- A teen play about bullying
- now a new movie that promises to be more faithful to the source material.
Truitt compares the theme’s found in Carrie to the new movie The Loved Ones, writing:
The original is a classic, with Sissy Spacek's bullied title character having her one shining prom moment ruined by a bucket of pig blood (though she exracts revenge). The Loved Ones is a similar story of "a girl who never really had a chance because she had such a messed-up socialization," says first-time writer/director Sean Byrne. "It's a candy nightmare."
Truitt goes on to discuss with Weinberg the upcoming Carrie remake, citing Weinberg as saying that he thinks the new crew will "do justice to the original which remains the mother of all prom horror flicks."
Weinberg said:
"That slaughter in the gymnasium is pretty crazy," he says. "De Palma, love him or hate him, lets you know visually they're trapped. They're all going to die. You expect her to get her revenge, but I don't know, man, that's pretty harsh."So, tell me. . . was Carrie's revenge too "harsh"? My vote is no! But I did like the TV remake a lot, which added a hopeful ending and some likable side characters.
The full article is HERE.
Quigley: Review of Battleground
Kevin Quigley has posted a review of the limited edition of Stephen King’s television adaptation of Battleground at fearnet. Battleground is set for publication this Summer from Gauntlet Press.
Quigley gives great details on the book and his usual enthusiasm for King’s work shines through the essay. I especially liked his description of Richard Matheson’s script of Battleground. He writes this interesting side note:
“if the lack of dialogue in the film seems unsettling, in the script it's downright bizarre. For those who have read scripts before, this teleplay feels markedly denser; Matheson makes up for it with short, clipped stage direction that translates to our image of Hurt's Renshaw with ease."The book also includes essays and interviews with, Quigley says, “everyone” involved. He says that a lot of these sections are “just fun”!
The full review is here at FEARNET.
Quigley Review of Wind Through The Keyhole
I always enjoy Kevin Quigley's reviews of King's work -- and his most recent does not disappoint. Quigley's review of Wind Through the Keyhole is posted at fearnet.
Of course, this story fits between Wizard and Glass and Wolves of the Calla. Quigley calls this a "midquil." It seems that with Wolves King struck new energy, while things were feeling a bit (forgive me) slow with Wizard.I was surprised to learn that Wind Through the Keyhole is told in the first person. As Quigley points out, King has been doing a lot of first person lately.
In Wind Through The Keyhole, we learn that there is an entire book of great adventures called, "The Great Elden Book." Quigley quotes King: "a fine and terrible compendium that may someday merit publication of its own, as those stories cast light on Mid-World as it once was."
Quigley describes how some readers have developed what he calls "Tower Fatigue" as King includes more and more tower references into his later work. He argues that the time away from the tower and in particular the main characters has been good for King.
I really liked how Quigley made the case for Keyhole being necessary. Not just fun or a side trip -- but necessary! He writes, "Whether readers loved or loathed the ending of the Dark Tower, a book like The Wind Through the Keyhole offers intriguing possibilities."
Check out the review, it's HERE.
Quigley: Collection Time for Stephen King
Kevin Quigley has posted a great article at FEARnet.com. Quigley is author of several books about Stephen King and proprietor of Charnel House.
Quigley's article, titled "Collection Time for Stephen King: An Observation" is like an alarm clock reminding the constant reader that the time must be near for another collection of short stories. In Collection Time, Quigley gives us an examination of several of King's short stories that have not yet been included in a book.
Of course, some of King's most memorable works have come from the books of short stories. The Mist was one of my favorites. Of course, sometimes the short stories are deeply connected to King's novels. Jerusalem's Lot lay the ground work for Salem's Lot and Night Surf was groundwork for The Stand. One of my favorites is Survivor Type -- which is a different kind of take on cannibalism.
Quigley spots things I would easily miss. (Maybe because I don't focus enough on the short stories, as I'm just trying to stay afloat reading all those novels!) I like this observation about Morality:
"Morality" forms a loose trilogy with "Mute" (from Just After Sunset) and Full Dark, No Stars' "Fair Extension" as stories that explore the concept of sin and how it affects regular people.Quigley also considers what story should serve as the "opening act." I'll stop giving spoilers, because you should really read this article and chew on his conclusions. I like it all!
The full article is HERE.
2012 SK Desk Calendar
The Stephen King Desk Calendar is now on sale (here). It is a 128 spiral hardcover calendar from Mooseluck Associates, Inc. The theme this year is the Dark Tower, and the cover looks awesome.
According to fearnet's Brian James, contributors include Matt Bergin, Peter Brett, Justin Brooks, Myke Cole, Matthew DeVirgiliis, Samantha Etkin, Jay Franco, Brian James Freeman, Robin Furth, Stephen Jewell, Daniel M. Kimmel, Fotini Marcopulos, Jon Oden, Micol Ostow, Tricia Pasternak, Rome Quezada, Jeff Somers, and Bev Vincent.
The book clubs website reads: "If you’re a fan of Stephen King, chances are you avoid pet cemeteries, you have a healthy fear of clowns and when you think of the Man in Black, it isn’t Johnny Cash who comes to mind. But there’s so much more to the Master of Horror, and in our Club exclusive Stephen King Library Desk Calendar 2012, you get to spend a year inside his sinister universe. Packed with essays, juicy details and fascinating trivia, this year’s calendar is also full of excerpts from all the Dark Tower books, articles from professionals he has influenced and more. Plus, it features quizzes—like Mid-World Word Trivia, which tests your knowledge of High Speech—and notes on the future of the series. This calendar is packed with so much, it’s scary!"
Bev Vincent's Interview With Mick Garris
![]() |
| Director Mick Garris with 89-year-old William Schallert, who plays Max Devore from fearnet.com |
Vincent and Garris discuss the original plan for Bag of Bones to be a feature film and how it progressed into a mini-series. Garris levels with us, saying, "the two-hour script really felt like we were missing stuff." I love his passion for staying faithful to the King source material. Garris also tells Vincent that there was no network censorship!
Also discussed are filming locations and special effects. In fact, Garris promises, "There are a lot of key visual effects. Sara and the tree sequences. There are hauntings. They're not all over the movie, but there are some pretty extensive things in it."
Is Stephen King in Bag of Bones? Check out the interview (the answer is in part 1) Garris also discusses what other actor was considered for the part of Noonan.
The Interview: Part 1
The Interview: Part 2
The Interview: Part 3
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














