Lilja's Review Of 11/22/63


My favorite King reviews always come from Lilja's Library.  He gives a lot of information, without giving up too much.  More than that, he makes me want to read the book. 

Lilja's review of 11/22/63 is HERE.

A couple of quotes -- because I can't resist!  The veteran King reviewer says that "11/22/63 hooked me from the first page and didn't let me go until I'd finished it."  He declares the characters "believable" and the alternate history "so credible that it feels as if all the events actually happened."

When the publisher puts the promo quotes on the back of the paperback (or front) -- they ought to use Lilja's !  But alas, they won't.  They'll quote from the New York Times or from someone who won't know King and his work nearly as well. 

Okay, go read the full review.  So this post is. . . reviewing the review. 

NINETEEN SIXTY THREE (part one)


All constant readers know the importance of the sixties to Stephen King's work.  This heavy emphasis in his novels is a reflection of the impact the decade made on King personally.

I was born in 1973.  So I have fond memories of. . . the late 70's and 80's !  I have never thought well of the 60's.  That was my parents generation, and in general I think it was a pretty messed up era.  My perception is that some pretty bad stuff come out of the 60's.  The 60's gave us: Vietnam, Hippies and intense racial strife. 

But the 60's were much more than that.  It was an era when our nation was coming of age.  Several King novels deal with the 60's.  By setting alone, King is able to give history lessons that would make my high school teachers drool. 

The sixties also gave us the Twilight Zone, John Kennedy, The Jetsons, Cool Elvis and a host of other things.

1963, the year King's next novel focuses on, was the year
  • Hitchcock gave us The Birds.
  • Lassie was popular on television, as was Andy Griffith and the Dick Van Dyke Show.  Hold on, that's not all -- mom and pop were also busy watching My Favorite Martian. 
  • Gas cost 29 cents per gallon.  A loaf of bread was 22 cents.
  • The average cost of a new car was $3,233.
  • Audio cassettes hit the market. 
  • A brand spankin new house would cost you $12,650.
  • Average income per year was $5,807 per year.  (So don't get too excited bout those house prices, eh!)  Minimum wage was $1.25.  A stamp cost 0.05.
  • AT&T introduced touch tone phones.  Of course, it would take a while for them to catch on!  I still have a rotary cell phone. . .
  • Zip codes were implemented.  HOLD ON!  We didn't have zip codes until 1963?  Seriously?!
  • James Meredith was the first black to graduated from the university of Mississippi in 1963.
  • 1963 also gave us -- are you ready for this -- THE LAVA LAMP!
  • Pull tabs for soda were introduced.
  • The Beatles gave us "I want to hold your hand." 
  • To Kill a Mocking Bird was released in theaters, as was Cleopatra and Lawrence of Arabia.
  • Martin Luther King gave his "I Have A Dream" speech in 1963.
  • Pope John the 23 died. 
  • Alcatraz closed.
  • The Ku Klux Klan dynamited a Baptist Church in Birmingham in Alabama, resulting in the deaths of 4 young girls.
TIME WARP TO 1963





Pet Sematary Remake Still In The Works

The Hollywood Reporter has a short article stating that Lorenzo di Bonaventura has signed a three year deal to remain at Paramount -- where he's been for the last 10 years.  He has helmed G.I. Joe and was one of several producers for Transformers, Dark of the Moon. 

So what will Bonaventura be working on?  THR says one of his projects will be "a remake of Stephen King's Pet Sematary."  That, and G.I. Joe 2: Retaliation.

Fan Appreciation Day

stephenking.com just gave word that there will be a "fan appreciation giveaway."  Awesome!  Here is their announcement:

11/22/63 Fan Appreciation Giveaway Coming November 8th
To celebrate the release of 11/22/63, StephenKing.com is proud to announce that we will be holding a Fan Appreciation Giveaway. Entries will be accepted from 6:00 AM ET through 11:59 PM ET on November 8th. (See Complete Rules for details)

Fans within the United States will be able to submit their entries using this form during the hours listed above. We will randomly select 100 people to receive a free mass market hardcover edition of 11/22/63.

Penned To Death



On The Red Carpet reveals that J.K. Rowling almost knocked off the red headed best friend of Harry Potter, Ron Weasley.  Why?  Out of sheer spite, she says!  She was in a "bad place" in her life, and I guess killing a character was one way she considered easing the stress.

Stephen King has been known to kill more than a few major characters.  But his reasoning is a bit different.  I can't think of a time King ever revealed he killed off a character (or even thought about it) because he was in a foul mood.

Why a writer chooses to kill off a character may not matter much -- unless you're actually a character in the novel!  Check out Stranger Than Fiction.  The author is in an incredible position with the power to let characters live or die.  But WHY?  What causes writers to snuff out some of our favorite characters?

King once said that he had fully planned to ink out Paul Sheldon in Misery.  But, Sheldon proved to be stronger than he expected.  He couldn't do it!  The deaths of several main characters in The Stand occur for quite a different reason.  King says he was out on a walk when he realized that his problem was that the novel had become overcrowded. 

So here's Sheldon lives on because he's "stronger than expected" . . . but a few favorites in The Stand are pushing up daisies because of overcrowding!  Then there are those characters who, but they just keep coming back.  Jake Chambers comes to mind, and Flagg. 

King once said that he planned to kill the whole crew in The Shining.  He didn't, and like Sheldon, Danny seems to have proved stronger than the writer expected.  Thus Danny can shine on.

Sometimes a character dies in the novel, but lives on in the movies, such as occurs in Cujo.  Did you know the Jenny lived on in Forrest Gump?  Yep, Groom said that he didn't like the change.  In fact, Groom stubbornly chose to stick with the continuity of the book version when writing Gump and Co.  Or, in reverse, characters die in the movie who live on in the book.  Case in point, The Mist!

Often a story revolves around a characters death; they didn't have a chance to begin with!  Dickens' opened Christmas Carol with the strong statement "Marley was dead."  Gage's death is the center of Pet Sematary.

What's maddening is when a writer kills a character off simply because they want to pursue a new storyline.  Case in point, Dickens' has poor ole David Copperfieldn's wife die just in time for him to meet up with his true love. 

Sometimes a writer uses their ability to kill characters off as something of a powerplay on the reader.  We are at their mercy as much as the characters are!  What do we do when we want to object, call foul?  Well, there's nothing we can do!  We can't bring characters back to life (ask Annie Wilkes!).  Has King ever killed characters off just for sheer power?  Well, something not so nice is up in those Bachman books!  Case in point, read the end of Thinner. 

So, has a writer ever surprised you with a death?  He's a few shocks I got:
1. Needful Things has a death I totally didn't expect, but I don't want to give away too much. 
2. Ken Follett killed Tom Builder.
3. The Dark Tower 7.  Again, no details.
4. I didn't expect Christine to be a blood bath.
5. A Separate Peace has a death that caught me by surprise as a teen.
6. Sherlock Holmes.  Yep, he died.  No, I didn't see it coming (come on, I was a kid when I read it for the first time).  Yes, he came back. 
7. Dreamcatcher. . . dare I mention the scene?  You know the one -- on the potty.
8. Of Mice And Men.  You have to read the novel.  I didn't see it coming.
9. Les Miserable.  It ends with a death that shocked me.
10. The Dead Zone surprised me.
11. The War Of The Worlds, the martians!

And then there was J.R. on Dallas . . . and Spock

Howard Talks DARK TOWER Movie



Hollywood Reporter has posted an interview with Ron Howard.  The meat of the interview revolves around Howard's current project RUSH.

The Tower still has a hold of Ron Howard's heart. he says he is in love with the material and is "fully committed to it."

The Reporter asked Howard about the future of Dark Tower.  Howard said that work on the script continues as they seek ways to make the budget more "manageable" and "still deliver the work in a way that the project deserves."  That sounds hopeful!

Howard also notes that projects like the Dark Tower often take years to "come together the right way."  Which, again, is exactly what Constant Readers want to hear!  Go ahead, take your time. . . just do it right!

We should note that the books themselves did not come to any of us as quickly as we wanted.  There were long (very long) gaps between each installment.  King was hounded by fans to finish he project.  In the end, he took his time and did it right.  Of course, there were no budget cuts in the novels!

Anne Rice Bites Into TWILIGHT Vamps

What should Vampires be?  According to Stephen King "killers, baby!"  He got some heat a while back when he said the author of Twilight couldn't write. 

Anne Rice has brought her own complaints about Twilight to the table.  Her focus isn't just the writing, it's the nature of vampires themselves.  Rice's tone might be playful, but come on -- this is a serious issue!  Do we want scary vamps, or sexy vamps?  My daughter loves Twilight.  I love Salem's Lot and Anne Rice gave us some pretty incredible vampires as well. 

At her facebook page, Rice wrote: Lestat and Louie feel sorry for vampires that sparkle in the sun. They would never hurt immortals who choose to spend eternity going to high school over and over again in a small town ---- anymore than they would hurt the physically disabled or the mentally challenged. My vampires possess gravitas. They can afford to be merciful." 

Haha!  Wonderful, Anne!  Nothing bad said about those other vamps, she's just talking about Lestat.  It would be interesting to find out what influence King has had on Anne Rice.

Here's my post "Scary Vamps Please!"

All Those Scary Lists!



The web is chalk full of Stephen King lists right now.  Here's my summery:

Our Top 7 Scariest Horror Movie Scenes will chill your bones
al.com (Alabama Live)
  • The Shining
  • Mulholland Drive
  • The Thing
  • Psycho
  • Texas Chainsaw Massacre
  • Poltergeist
  • The Blair Witch Project

Ten Best Stephen King books to read on Halloween
ohnotheydidnt
  • Salem's Lot
  • Cycle Of The Werewolf
  • Pet Sematary
  • IT
  • The Stand
  • Carrie
  • Misery
  • Danse Macabre
  • Nightmares & Dreamscapes
  • The Shining
I would need about a year and a half's worth of Halloween's back to back in order to read all that!  It's an interesting list, though worth noting that King doesn't utilize Halloween in his writing.  He is actually much less interested in dates than he is the story. 

Five Movies That Scared Me As A Little Kid
RGJ.com
  • Associated Press writer Chrsitie Lemire gives us the following list:
  • The Shining
  • The Exorcist
  • The Amityville Horror
  • Fantasia
  • The Wizard Of Oz

For me, it was the freaky bald earless Martians in the TV mini-series "The Martian Chronicles."

About The Shining, Lemire writes: "I have no idea what my parents were thinking letting me see this movie -- and read the Stephen King novel that inspired it -- but it remains, in my opinion, the scariest movie ever made. A lot of that has to do with Stanley Kubrick's bold, startling visuals. A lot of that has to do with the unwanted psychic images that flash into young Danny's mind -- you're a kid, maybe that could happen to you, too. And then, of course, there's the notion of your father, the man you trust, losing his mind and turning on you and your mother. It didn't help that my dad looked vaguely like Jack Nicholson back then, and he'd stand in the doorway maniacally snarling, "Here's Daddy!" just to mess with me. Yeah. Good times.

The Top 12 Stephen King novels
examiner.com

This list comes from Fiction Examiner Rory O'Connor.  Here's her list, with the links she included back to the Stephen King library.

12. Duma Key
11. The Tommyknockers
10. The Long Walk (written as Richard Bachman)
9. Christine
8. The Dark Half
7. Misery
6. 'Salem's Lot
5. Pet Semetary
4. Insomnia
3. Bag of Bones
2. It
1. The Stand

11 Best Stephen King Screen Adaptations
pastemagazine

This list by Wyndham Wyeth is a bit older, but worth noting again:

11. IT.
10. The Stand
9. The Mist
8. Pet Sematary
7. Nightmares and Dreamscapes
6. Carrie
5. Misery
4. Green Mile
3. Stand By Me
2. The Shawshank Redemption
1. The Shining. (Kubrick)

Show Me Your Books: Review Of Carrie



Show Me Your Books has a couple of new Stephen King reviews.  They are a look back at two King classics; Carrie and Night Shift.  Both are worth your time!  Show Me Your Books has kindly agreed to let me repost the Carrie review.  I think you'll like it, I did! 

Does the title "Show Me Your Books" remind you to the RatMan in The Stand?  "Bring out your dead!" Only, here it's "Bring out your books!  Bring out your books!"  No?  Oh well, maybe I've overly Kinged up as I await 11/22/63 !

There are a LOT of good reviews at Show Me Your Books.  Check them out here.  The growing list of reviews includes everything from Jules Verne's 20,000 Leagues Under The Sea to H.P. Lovecraft.  Add to that John Saul, Ken Follett, Anne Rice, Bentley Little -- just to list a few.


Stephen King Carrie

Plot:
Carrie may be picked on by her classmates, but she has a gift. She can move things with her mind. Doors lock. Candles fall. This is her power and her problem. Then, an act of kindness, as spontaneous as the vicious taunts of her classmates, offers Carrie a chance to be a normal ... until an unexpected cruelty turns her gift into a weapon of horror and destruction that no one will ever forget.
My Review and Thoughts:
 
 
Aaaa the birth of the Master of Horror. The very first, one of kind book Carrie published in 1974. The shocking aspect is this was King's fourth novel. It was for a magazine Cavalier and amazingly the first three pages of this book ended up in the garbage thankfully his wife took them out and told him he should finish the story. And so the birth of Carrie and the birth of a published master started.
 
 
This was the third Stephen King book I read when I first started getting into his writing. The first being IT and the second being Night Shift. I first read Carrie in 1989 and decided to give it another go because of the new cover released by AnchorBooks and felt it needed to be reviewed for Horror Fiction Reviews and I wanted to adventure again into classic King at his best.
 
 
I can't say enough about this book because I was a mistreated child and bullied in school, beat, made fun of and basically destroyed in many ways and so I looked at Carrie as a somewhat fantasy and savior due to the fact Carrie fights back and I wished during those horrible school times to be able to have those powers and fight back against those who enjoyed destroying me. The whole book is a powerful written story of horrifying chills that grabs the reader and shakes them violently into the story placing you there in all the wonderful amazing masterpiece word play that is throughout.
 
 
A perfect haunting masterpiece of eerie atmospheres, characters and a deep thick storyline that plays inside the readers head. Pure imagination runs wild in this book, King's powerful imagination flows upon the page and out upon the reader.
 
 
If you think you know Carrie because you have watched the movie or the mini-series then you don't know Carrie and you are not a true Stephen King fan or horror fiction fan unless you have read this book. The book has a lot more story, back story and also the aftermath. The book is a flawless example of what to do to create a perfect flowing book. Carrie reeks with images and emotions that the reader becomes apart of in many priceless ways.
 
 
This is a book that stands the test of time and is a as good in the 70's as much as it is today. The characters are flawless. Momma is one of the greatest fictional lunatics to ever grace the written page and is a character that haunts you and sticks with you as a truly insane person and pure evil in herself and her ways. Her parts are so well written you get thick emotions such as anger and hate toward her as you read showing the talent of the master craftsmanship of the writing skill put into this book.
 
 
Like I say no true horror fan or Stephen King fan can get away with saying yeah they know Carrie because of the movie, that's an insult to the power of this book and also to the world of written fiction, taking a movie in the place of the original concept. The movie yes is good but strays on my things, from Carrie's childhood to her true self, the movie changes her image all together, she looks nothing like what the movie betrays.
 
 
This is a power book that after reading it again after 21 years it still works in all it's original ways. A flawless book of characters, situations and horror. A pure tour-de-force of written quality that only a master storyteller can create.
 
 
Like I say if you think you know Carrie because of the movie, your all wrong. The movie is great and the acting is flawless but the book and movie are really two different entities in there own ways. The book has the back story, the different prom ordeal, the showdown between Momma and Carrie is different, Carrie not only takes out the prom kids she takes out the whole town in one climatic showdown that has to be read to understand even the ending of the book is different and might I add a flawless classic ending. This is a flawless book, a masterpiece of written word. A true powerful example of how to write a lasting book that still holds up today as it did then.
 
 
A must read, must own.

Genre Busters



In the recent Wall Street Journal interview, King said that 11/22/63 was so different for him that it was like trying to break in a new pair of shoes.  We all know that King thrives in the horror genre, but his writing has never been limited to horror alone. 

I think it is important to note that King often mixes genre's.  Don't be surprised to find sci-fi dancing with horror while it holds hands with a bit of romance.  I mean, Christine was described as a love triangle!  And what was Lisey's story?

The Dark Tower was a dark version of The Lord of the Rings.  It involved Romance, Horror, lots of Fantasy, Drama, Action Adventure and more.

Under mystery, there was Umley's Last case and that strange novel Haven.  I'm not sure Haven was really a mystery, since the mystery was never solved!  (Or did I miss something?)

Here is my top ten Stephen King genre busters.

1. COMING OF AGE: The Body. I think this one falls under "Drama."  Or Coming of Age.  Whatever it was, I liked it.

2. DRAMA: The Shawshank Redemption.  A prison break without a ghost in sight. 

3. SCI-FI: The Tommyknockers.  This long, very unusual novel was sci-fi.  I think.  Was it?  Yes, definitely.  Maybe.

4. APCALYPTIC: The Stand.  While the Stand contains elements of horror, I think one reason it took the world by storm is because it was so unexpected from the young Stephen King.  It falls under the rather strange category of apocalyptic.

5. ?  Rage.  While all of the Bachman books break type in some way, there will never again be another book quite like Rage.  It reminds me of an extreme Catcher In The Rye.  It is both insightful, prophetic and flat out scary.

6. SCI-FI: From A Buick 8.  Sci-fi all the way, with the added bonus of multiple points of view.  It was a very unique novel that seems overlooked in the King canon.  For all the King adaptations that have suddenly become so popular, where is this one?  I'm afraid it's simply seen as a "Christine part 2" for those who don't know what it's really about.

7. FANTASY: The Eyes Of The Dragon.  A children's book that was much more than a children's book.  It falls neatly under the category of dark fantasy.

8. DRAMA: The Green Mile.  yes, there are dead people here, and violence, but the novel is really about a healer and the man who is required to put him to death.  So what is it?  Drama? 

9. SUSPENSE: Dolorores Claiborne.  A rambling confession takes all kinds of suspenseful turns.  And that's what I think it is. . . suspense.   What if a woman who got away with a murder was now accused of a murder she was actually innocent of?  I like it!  The novel is never really a "mystery" since we know from the start who done it!  This is also unique because it is a woman's first person narrative.  "How does he know what women are thinking?" My wife often asks, noting how strong King's female characters often are.

10. SUSPENSE: Misery.  It was originally slated to be a Bachman novel, but then someone turned the lights on Mr. King and outed him.  Anyway, Misery is almost 100% suspense.  It's the kind of stuff Hitchcock would have loved. 
The really nice thing about a Stephen King novel is that none of them fall neatly into the parameters of normal genres.  King is more focused on telling the story than he is interested in shaping it to fit neatly into a publishers box.  Proof positive that he is not the "hack" that mean spirited, usually jealous people accuse him of being.  He's not churning out cheap novels, he's telling rich stories that build on well developed characters and a variety of genre's.

Feel free to post your own list.

Wall Street Journal: 11/22/63 Is A Deeply Researched Novel

Everett Collection (4); Associated Press (Oswald); iStockphoto (frames, wallpaper)
online.wsj.com

Alexandra Altar has a fantastic, and thorough article about Stephen King in the Wall Street Journal.  Altar calls 11/22/63 a "deeply researched, something he's never done before."

King described writing historical fiction  "Like learning to wear a new pair of shoes."  Altar says that King has grown "increasingly private" but in person he appears "relaxed, profane and unguarded, discussing everything from his love of dogs, especially corgis, to his aversion to cell phones, which he called "slave bracelets." Eating a cinnamon bun in his kitchen, he spoke about how his sons Joe and Owen, both writers, tend to show their manuscripts to their mother rather than him."

The New Stephen King:

King reveals in the interview that he hopes this novel will reach a new -- wider -- audience.   Altar quotes King, "This might be a book where we really have a chance to get an audience who's not my ordinary audience.  Instead of people who read horror stories, people who read 'The Help' or 'People of the Book' might like this book, if they can get the message." 

Scribner is seeking to "rebrand" King, Altar says, aiming at history buffs.  Does that mean constant readers are likely to walk away?  No way!  Most of us don't read King just for the scares, we read him because no one else in the world can tell a story the way he does.  His -- voice -- speaks to us in a way no one else really does.  That doesn't mean we only read King, but it does mean that for many of us, only King consistently connects with us.

If anyone is actually concerned King is making too big a break with horror, remember, he is currently writing a sequel to The Shining!

In the research process, Altar reveals that King had dinner with Doris Kearns Goodwin -- the author of one of my favorite books, Team of Rivals.  Team Of Rivals tells the story of Lincoln's cabinet, how they didn't get along, and the presidents ability to benefit from a very diverse group of people.

35 years in the making:

Everyone is always interested in where an idea came from.  So. . . where did 11/22/63 come from? 
Altar says the idea for the novel "first struck him in 1973, when he was on the brink of publishing his first novel, "Carrie," about a bullied teenage girl with psychic powers. At the time, Mr. King felt the historical novel required too much research, and greater literary chops than he possessed. Though Mr. King doesn't keep a writer's notebook—"The good ideas stick," he said—the idea lingered for 35 years."

Altar promises that though this is new ground for King, it still bears many of his trademarks.   She calls it "ultra-violent" and suspenseful with "supernatural overtones."  I think what many of us like about King is not just that he is violent or supernatural -- it's that he's not afraid to let the story take any turn it needs to.  He doesn't kill people just for the sake of killing them -- that would be Richard Laymon!  But he has no fear of letting to story take the path it needs to without his own self imposed limitations.

11/22/63 Connects To IT !

Altar also reveals that the new novel contains some characters from IT.  It would actually be unusual for King not to connect a novel to his other works.

The article is here.  Be sure to watch the video as well as read the article.

Club Stephen King Contest !



http://quotes.club-stephenking.fr/contest

Club Stephen King has topped 10,000 followers on twitter!  Join the updates and you'll also be able to get in on their current contest. 

Here's the links -- have fun!

Haunting Of The Stanley Hotel



The Stanley Hotel is a popular topic at Halloween time.  Rebecca Pittman has written a book titled, "The History and Haunting of the Stanley Hotel."

411 Mania Goes Stephen King List Crazy



411 Mania loves making list!  Their Five by Five Halloween (HERE) has several Stephen King hits. 

The Shining comes in #4 on their scariest movies of all time list.  #4 ain't bad. . . but I don't understand how they didn't see Sleepwalkers truly is the scariest movie ever.  Anyway, about the Shining: "The Shining is our most recent entry onto the list. Though hated by its creator, Stephen King , it's beloved by just about everyone else. If it's not Jack Nicholson's most memorable performance, it's right up there. There are so many images from this film that will never be forgotten…."

Under "FIVE FILMS NOTICEABLY ABSENT" Stephen King's Misery rides in at #3.

And then they have an entire 5 best Stephen King films. 
 1. The Shining
2.
Pet Sematary
3. Carrie
4. Creepshow
5. Salem's Lot

I find this list a little odd, but I don't think anyone would argue with The Shining as the top choice whether King likes it or not. Again, the film focuses on Jack Torrance as the main antagonist as opposed to the hotel itself, but I think there's enough there that we know the hotel is pretty freaking evil and is behind most of what Jack is doing. Not King's best book, but I've got no argument against it being his best horr movie…..I am glad that Pet Sematary made the list. It is extremely underrated as a horror book and film. I think it's overlooked because it was put out during that time where King books weren't getting good treatment on the big screen and it's kind of thrown in that mix unfairly. Miko Hughes is amazing for being as young as he was…..I don't think any list of King's would be complete without Carrie. The star aligned just right for this one, making a horror classic.  King movies started out so good. What happen in the 80s?.....I like Creepshow. Do I think it should be rated higher than the likes of Cujo, The Mist , Misery, Secret Window  or Silver Bullet? Probably not, but that's my personal opinion. King, himself, gives a nice performance in Creepshow. A solid film, no doubt…..A strange flick rounds us out as Salem's Lot was originally a TV movie and it's not even close to the best thing King has had on TV. I'd put The Stand, IT, Storm of the Century , Rose Red, Kingdom Hospital and Sometimes They Come Back all out in front of it. Somebody liked it enough to give it this many points!

Amber Grey: There's Something About Carrie

I enjoyed this article by Amber Grey -- you will, too.  Reposted from bellaonline.com with permission.  Thank you, Amber!



There's Something About Carrie
by Amber Grey
BellaOnline's Classic Film Editor


In horror films, fear is a universal feeling, which is what makes them fun to watch over and over again. Everyone has a favorite movie that gives them a special thrill and chill that can only happen while watching a horror film. But sometimes horror films, good horror films, can generate other feelings and "Carrie" (1976) is one of those films. If you were the outcast in high school, you felt sympathy for her and admittedly felt a little sinister towards the infamous prom scene when she sets the school's gymnasium on fire with her telekinesis powers.

Carrie's creator was the legendary Stephen King who published the novel when he was just twenty-six years old. Initially, when King finished the novel, he threw it away. He was completely convinced that it was an atrocious story. But it was his wife who rescued it and encouraged him to see if he could publish it. Hence, "Carrie" became his first published novel. Although, Carrie is described in the novel as a blond with acne and slightly overweight. However, in the movie's script, Carrie is painfully thin with dirty blonde hair to suggest a person of naive fragility.

It was suggested by Jack Fisk, the film's cinematographer and Sissy Spacek's husband, that Spacek audition for the role. However, Spacek failed to accurately impress the director, Brian De Palma and was cast as playing Christine, the leader of the pack who harasses Carrie throughout the film. Spacek, who was not one to take rejection lightly, went for a second audition. Only this time, Spacek went without make-up, applied Vaseline to her hair and wore a sailor dress her mother had made for her in the 7th grade. No doubt, her appearance enhanced her portrayal because Spacek won the role.

The then-27 year old actress was very committed to the role; so committed that she admitted to being comfortable with having actual pig's blood being used if so needed for the climactic prom scene. However, a substitute of corn syrup and food coloring was used instead of real blood. In the final scene where Carrie reaches up and grabs Sue's hand, Spacek also insisted for it to be her hand that reaches up and grab actress, Amy Irving's hand. Director Brian De Palma wanted to use a stunt person but could not argue with her, so he had Spacek's husband bury her deep enough to thrust her hand through a box.

With such a break-out debut as "Carrie", Spacek was on Hollywood's radar after the film's opening. Along with her co-star Piper Laurie, both actresses were nominated for Academy Awards for their roles. Eight years later, Spacek would win the Academy Award for her portrayal of Loretta Lynn in "Coal Miner's Daughter" (1980).

In 2010, with rumors of a remake striking every media outlet in Hollywood, Lindsay Lohan was mentioned as one to play the title role. While Stephen King was against the possible remake, Spacek approved of Lohan's casting. Despite her approval, further production news of a remake has not been updated.

Road To The Dark Tower Turns Toward HBO

Speaking with MTV News at the "Tower Heist", Brian Grazer revealed that "The Dark Tower" is still very much on track.  In fact, HBO has come on board. 

This is from the MTV Movie Blog. 

Bag Of Bones Read-Along



Castle Macabre has stated a Bag Of Bones read along.  Want to get the book knocked out before the mini-series spills all the surprises?  This is your chance to spend some time at the house by the lake.  Oh, by the way, it's haunted.

Taking from Castle Macabre post. . .

Here's how it will work
Each week we will read approximately 125 pages (give or take), beginning on Sunday and posting thoughts/discussion on Saturday. Now, I know weekends are busy so if you're a couple of days late posting, that's absolutely no problem (if you don't have a blog, feel free to post your thoughts in the comments). Please stop by and leave the link to your post in the comments. Also, feel free to comment on my post.  Castle Macabre
 
Here is the schedule:
  • November 13-19--Chapter 1 - 9
  • November 20-26--Chapter 10 - 15
  • November 27-December 3--Chapter 16 - 21
  • December 4-10--Chapter 22 - End

In Search Of A "GREEN" Pet Sematary



The Miami Herald has an . . . interesting . . . question and answer in their "enviroment" section.  I'll post the question, and part of the answer, but you really should check out the whole thing over at Miami Herald.  Enjoy! 
Q: Much to my boyfriend's chagrin, at around this time of year I unearth my ever-expanding collection of horror movies. First up to bat is an old favorite, the 1989 adaptation of Stephen King's "Pet Sematary" (here's guessing I'll be having nightmares about Zelda for the next three weeks). Since last watching it, I've adopted two pet kitties that I love very much so I'm guessing, as a new pet owner, I'll be viewing the movie from a slightly different perspective. This isn't to say that if something horrible happens to Merle and Mona I'll be so overcome with grief that I'd consider throwing 'em in a burlap sack and heading on over to the local cursed Indian burial ground in hopes they'll be resurrected as zombie kittens. What I'm wondering is if there are any natural - and non-supernatural - burial alternatives for dearly departed pets? I know eco-sensitive burial methods are increasingly popular with humans, but what about for pets?
Here is the beginning of Matt Hickman's answer.
Funny you mention "Pet Sematary." I watched it at way too young of an age and convinced myself that the pet gerbils I had wrapped up in Kleenex and buried in the backyard of my childhood home would come back to life ... to get me. Thank goodness Teddy the family Shih Tzu was cremated and placed in a decorative urn on the mantle. Even my overactive imagination knew that there was no way that Teddy could come back - mad, mangy and with a chip on his furry little shoulder.
We are then given a guided tour of the nations green friendly pet burial options.  Ever tried ""Bio Cremation"?  I LIKE IT!  I LIKE IT A LOT!  Best of all, we are introduced to The Green Pet-Burial Society.

Anyone considered the Trashcan Man's method of pet burial?  I believe it is cremation -- but unclear on how Bio Friendly it is.

And to think, when I was ten, we just buried our dog in the back yard.

Now, for most of history animals have died in the wild, with no concern that the disposal of their bodies might not be eco friendly.  Maybe it's not the humans who are causing global warming, huh! Maybe it's all those careless animals, dying and not making sure they have a green burial. 

Yummy!

Tower Movie Reappears On The Horizon



Brian Grazer, producer of "The Dark Tower" movies and screen writer Akiva Goldsman, along with Ron Howard, have not given up on their pursuit of The Tower! 

THE PLAYLIST caught up with Brian Grazer and learned that there is yet hope for the dark tower.  As the Playlist reports, the budget has been "shaved." 
Grazer says, “We found a way to cut out $45 million out of the budget without changing the scope and actually giving it a good ending."   
The Playlist also quotes him as saying, “In the $140 million draft, the ending wasn’t quite as satisfying. Now, we’ve got $45 million, $50 million out of the way and a really satisfying ending. It’s gonna get made.”
So. . . uhhh, the ending is better with the smaller budget?  Lost me on that one!  Of course, the book ends very much like it starts, so if the movie follows that path -- it certainly cuts down on budget!

The Plalist also notes that "with Javier Bardem still attached in the lead role of Roland Deschain, and with a scaled down budget, financing will likely be much easier to pull together and perhaps we’ll see The Dark Tower kicked back to life sooner than we thought."

DVD Verdict: IT



Patrick Naugle at DVD Verdict has posted a very strong, insightful review of the IT mini-series.  I like the format DVD Verdict takes; it's kind of a "Judge Dread" approach -- they build the case and render the verdict themselves. 

I agree with all of Naugle's conclusions!  I enjoyed the mini-series, but as I mentioned before, I was dismayed when my young children enjoyed it.  They're suppsed to be scared, not excited! 

Naugle brings up some issues I had not considered.  We all know about the small budget, the lame special effects and the made for TV limitations; but Naugle digs a layer deeper into the acting itself.  He gives Harry Anderson, Tim Curry and John Ritter high marks, but no such luck for Richard Thomas.  I had never thought about how much I don't like Thomas in this role!  But he's right, it doesn't work at all!  And I really like Richard Thomas -- usually. 

What Naugle misses is just how good the child actors are.  I find myself very engaged when the kids are on screen, and yawning when the adults take their turn.  Yet, it's the adult actors we remember; could it be because they're the ones who dropped the ball.  Maybe not the actors, maybe the adult story is not as interesting.  Either way, IT is about children, and in the mini-series, the children shine (and float!).

Check it out here: DVD review of IT

King's "The Dune" to appear in GRANTA

picture credit: Robert Deutsch, USA TODAY

Bob Minzesheimer at USA TODAY has some pretty exciting news: Granta, the London-based quarterly, has gotten Stephen King to "headline" an issue pandering to the literary side of horror.

Included will be "The Dune", a short story by Stephen King.  The Dune is about a 90-year-old retired judge who harbors a big secret about a tiny no-name island off the coast of Florida.   Minzesheimer gives a very nice summery of the story HERE.    The heart of this story?  Well it's about a dude who can read obituaries . . . IN ADVANCE!  The Dune is a perfect offering, since Minzesheimer explains that the horror is "psychological" more than blood and guts.

Also included will be stories by Don DeLillo, Paul Auster, Joy Williams and Mark Doty.

The choice for Stephen King is explained thusly: "Stephen King is a not only a great short story writer, but simply an important planet in our literary cosmos. In his best work he weaves all these elements of horror -- the metaphysical fear, the moral expulsions, and the formal machinery that evokes our fears so that we can exorcise them -- into one story. There's a reason why writers like David Foster Wallace cite him: he makes it look easy."

I can't wait!

THANKS TO BRYANT BURNETTE

I Don't Want Be Buried In The Pet Sematary



Huntsville Times staffer Neil Adams is posting a series titled "13 days of Halloween musical countdown" every day until Halloween.  Al.com explains that the post are certain "to warm the cobweb-matted corners of your heart."  I LIKE IT!

Today's offering, "The Ramones offer some burial tips."

Adams writes,
"The Stephen King novel out-creeped the movie it spawned, but the Ramones provided a highly memorable song for the film's soundtrack. The book/movie/song combo is enough to make you think twice about what you bury and -- especially -- where you bury it."
As for the video, it includes more than a dash of 1980s kitsch, but encasing the Ramones in a burial vault near the clip's end is a nice touch (as are Dee Dee's wicked spider bass and Uncle Stevie's cameo). If there's a rock 'n' roll heaven, it's a shame most of the group already is jamming there. The Ramones were a band that deserved to live forever. One way or another.
The full set of posts are here.

Could Ben Affleck Direct THE STAND ?



Mike Fleming at Deadline is reporting that Warner Brothers has chosen Ben Affleck to direct its feature film adaptation of Stephen King’s epic tome The Stand. 

Fleming notes that with The Town and Gone Baby Gone, Affleck has shown the grit necessary to handle such an unforgettable tale. It’s early days, but the studio loves Affleck, who’s now directing Argo.

That's all folks.

A Disciplined Writer

Jocelyn K. Glei at the the99percent.com has an interesting article titled "The Cure for Creative Blocks? Leave Your Desk."  I like articles where you don't have to do a lot of guessing what they're going to be about!  So no real summery here, Glei writes about getting away from your writing station.

She writes this about Stephen King's very disciplined routine:
Everyday between 8:00 and 8:30am writer Stephen King arrives at his desk with a cup of tea. He turns on some music, takes his daily vitamin, and begins to work – exactly as he began the day before. Using this routine, King has produced well over 50 books, averaging 1-2 novels a year since 1974 when he published Carrie.  Full Article Here. 

New Robert McCammon video interview



FIVE NEW EBOOKS ABOUT STEPHEN KING



What do you more own of. . . books by Stephen King, or books about Stephen King?  If you're books about Stephen King shelf is pretty bare, it's time to stock up!  Kevin Quigley at Charnel House has written five books about Stephen King -- all of them fascinating. 

I was first introduced to Quigley through Charnel House.  I was really impressed when I read Drawn Into Darkness (which was signed, by the way!)  Quigley's work is will researched.  He stays right on topic, moving smoothly from subject to subject, never blathering, but always offering substance. 

There is exciting news today: Five of Quigley's chapbooks have been released as ebooks from cemetery dance.  Also, "Blood in your ears" is being released before the print version!

Quigley notes at his website that he has worked diligently to keep the books as current as possible.  He writes, "all have new material and new information. Plus, best news: they are ALL available for only 99 cents, and ALL come in both Kindle and ePub format. No matter what e-reader you prefer, these books are perfect!"

The five books available are:
  • INK IN THE VEINS
  • BLOOD IN YOUR EARS
  • CHART OF DARKNESS
  • WETWARE
  • DRAWN INTO DARKNESS
Check out Charnel House for a full rundown on each book.  I already bought mine. . . wouldn't want them to run out of stock.  Besides, it's a first edition. . .

Buy the five at Amazon here.

Duma Key Journal 4



I finished Duma Key the other day, via audio book.  I enjoyed the book quite a bit. 

A few final notes:

1. The writing is consistently strong throughout.  The book is definitely horror.  It is not a novel that contains elements of horror, it is horror.  The book builds in ever mounting dread.  King brilliantly foreshadows the coming events, highlighting what is to come without giving the story away.

2. Art.  There's a lot of talk about art here.  It is in art that Edgar finds freedom and real brilliance.  Unfortunately, his most inspired paintings are also haunted -- and dangerous..As King discusses art, you often get the feeling he's really talking about writing.

There is so much attention given to paintings that I wish the book was illustrated!  I would like to see these brilliant paintings.  Obviously, the book cover gives us an idea of the central panting, but even that was just one in a series. 

3. Length.  Duma Key is a long novel.  Is it too long?  I don't know.  I enjoyed it all.  I find it interesting when people complain about a books length.  Are we in a hurry to finish?  Why not take your time, enjoy the ride!  I only object to a books length when it drags.  Duma Key does slow down, but I don't think it drags.

A lot of background information is giving to secondary characters.  Not just to the history of Duma Key, which is necessary to the story and unveiled very late in the novel, but to Edgar's friends and family.  I like this extra layer of texture that King gives novels.  Again, if you want a short hit and run story, either read King's novella's or read someone else.  He seems to relish in taking his time, and some of us love it!  In other words, bring on them mega books, Mr. King!

4. Money.  Once again, our lead character doesn't need to worry about money, he's filthy rich.  So rich, he can throw money at every problem that comes his way -- almost.  Though it works for this book, the rich lead character is getting thin for me. 

I enjoyed the more middle class (or dead broke) characters who inhabited Christine, Cujo, The Stand and Carrie.  The money is a sign that these characters are super successful, moving them a degree beyond the normal constant reader.  However, King identifies more deeply now with the very rich, very successful Edgar Freemantal's.  Again, this works in Duma Key.  It would have been difficult to get Carrie White on a secluded private island.

Duma Key's strength: Characters.
Duma Key's weakness: I can't think of any.

McCammon Releases ebooks


Open Road Media has released nine of Robert McCammon's books as ebooks.  Exciting news!  Now, about that Swan Song audio. . .

Here's the press release:
Open Road Media is pleased to announce the publication of nine terrifying tales by New York Times bestselling master of horror Robert R. McCammon, including Swan Song, his first novel to win the coveted Bram Stoker Award. From the late 1970s to the early 1990s, McCammon, an Alabama native, contributed significantly to the reemergence of the horror genre by crafting intense, character-driven narratives that blended elements of magical realism, science fiction, fantasy, and Southern gothic literature. McCammon’s wonderfully ambitious Swan Song tells the story of a post-apocalyptic world in which a girl with psychic abilities struggles to evade a mysterious force intent on destroying all remaining traces of beauty and hope. The novel is regarded as a horror classic in the same league as Stephen King’s The Stand. Recently Amazon.com called it “a monster of a horror book, brimming over with stories and violence and terrific imagery—God and the Devil, the whole works.”
You can get Swan Song on Kindle here at Amazon.


THE FIVE on King's Summer Reading List:
From robertmccammon.com

King briefly included Mccammon's new book "The Five" in his June 3, 2011 summer reading list.  King wrote in Entertainment Weekly, “The Five isn’t just Robert McCammon’s best novel in years; it’s his best novel ever. Terrifying, suspenseful, unputdownable, and full of rock and roll energy. It’s also uplifting, a book you’ll finish feeling better about your world, your friends, and your music. Here’s one you’ll beg friends to read.”

Five McCammon Novels Worth Adapting
And while we're on the subject of Robert Mccammon, I really enjoyed the article at Shock Till You Drop titled "Five Robert McCammon Novels Hollywood Should Be Adapting." 

After listing the five novels he thinks should be headed to the screen, Ryan Turek shares, "These are just my own personal selections I'd like to see brought to the screen. Frank Darabont has been trying to get an adaptation of "Mine" off the ground for years. "Swan Song" and "Baal" might be a fan faves, but I don't know if a filmmaker can properly pull these off."

Anna Adams: "My Life In Horror" Creepshow

I really enjoyed Anna Adams "My Life In Horror: Creepshow."  In fact, I think this is one of the best reviews of this film I've seen.  It's both energetic and personal.  In fact, the review alone makes me want to watch the film again.

Originally posted HERE.  She graciously allowed me to repost her article here.  THANK YOU!

Adams writes about film and television and is admirer of all things Kubrick, Tarantino, and LOST. She received her BA in Cinema Studies from The University of Minnesota.

You're gonna like this. . .

MY LIFE IN HORROR: CREEPSHOW


I saw the box for this film back when Terry's Holiday Market in Olivia was still Tersteeg's, and had a VHS selection for rental at the front of the store. Now that I think about it, it was an extremely effective setup for parents---instead of begging for candy bars, we'd always just bolt over to the videos to check out the boxes, and this one was a jackpot. I wanted to see it simply on the strength of the front cover: the little theater skeleton hanging out of the box office, cautioning us, "the most fun you'll ever have . . . BEING SCARED!" I have to agree; this film is seriously one of the most fun in my collection.

Creepshow, 1982. Directed by George Romaro

Comics! This is a collection of short stories written by Stephen King, directed by George Romaro, done in comic-book style. Could there be anything better? The structuring of each of the five stories was great, especially how each scene was illustrated, in comic format, and then faded in exactly, with the actors and setting matching the comic perfectly. Every now and then there's a comic-style wipe or dissolve--- it's crafty. The casting was excellent with many respectable actors taking part (Hal Holbrook, Fritz Weaver, Leslie Nielsen, a young Ed Harris just to name a few) and music was perfect, especially the eerie and emotional piano instrumentals. This is a well-written, entertaining (and yes, occasionaly frightening) experience, this film. Since it's composed of five short story segments, let's just break each one down, shall we?

Father's Day: An overwhelmed Bedelia bashes her father's head in with an ashtray on father's day; Father comes back from the grave gargling up dirt, insisting, "I want my cake." For superficial reasons, I really liked this. I always thought Cass, the niece with the brown, permed hair, white jeans, shirt opened three buttons and lots of necklaces, was extremely pretty. Her dancing? Not as pretty, but bad, eighties, and fun ("Don't let go, don't let go, don't let go!") Ed Harris meets an unfortunate end but I really loved the splat sound the grave made when it plopped on him. Nice seeing some of his early work. And the fact that the rotten old father-corpse really did just want a cake, and used the other aunt's head for it, complete with frosting and candles? I wonder if all child-horror fans giggled as much as my brother and I did over it . . . "It's Father's Day, and I GOT MY CAKE!"

The Lonesome Death of Jordy Verrill: Man finds meteor in back yard, touches it, and turns into a weed. I know this wasn't the best in the bunch, but there are some good things about it. For one, I thought King was just fine in his role, he was a goofy dork, just like he was supposed to be! My very favorite scenes in this were some of the lines, "I'll be dipped in shit if that ain't a meteor!" and "METEOR SHIT!" Also the imagined antics in the doctor's office (after his fingers start to turn green) make me giggle every time. That doctor, wheeling by on the stool? "This is going to be extremely painful, Mr. Verrill" running his finger up the blade of the knife, and the random skeleton just hovering around on its own, apparently also on wheels? It was fun (for a while). Ending is kind of sad, but what else was going to happen with a title like that?

Something to Tide You Over: Husband punishes his cheating wife and lover by burying them in the sand at high tide. Fine, I guess. Good use of "Camptown Races" in a minor key, and giving a murderer his come-uppance, but probably my least favorite of all of them. The part where Harry (Ted Danson) is shown under water, holding his breath, has always been disturbing for me. Really, you let someone talk you into burying yourself up to the chin in sand? That had to be a little claustrophobic, even acting it. On an unrelated note, sometimes it's hard for me to accept Leslie Nielsen as anything other than Frank Drebbin, despite having played some real a-holes in his career. The scene where Nielsen is at home, anticipating and jumping at noises has always been difficult for me to watch---being home alone is still one of my very least favorite things, especially at night (even though I haven't ever buried anyone in the sand).

The Crate: An ancient hell-monkey is found in a crate; it starts eating everyone. This one terrified me the first time I watched it. In fact, I'm quite sure that my brother, my best friend, and I watched this right up to janitor getting gobbled and then shut it off, unable to go any further with it. Granted, I was probably ten, but I still remember being rattled to hell. And while I do still find it scary, I really got into the whole nagging wife aspect (personified by Adrienne Barbeau) this time around ---"just call me Billy, everyone does!"--- thinking that this idea had to have been born from a random experience of King's concerning some professor's horrid wife and what in the name of God could he do to be free of her? (!) I dug it. There's some nice acting in this one, and the players really had great chemistry together. "He wanted to examine the bite marks . . . I GUESS HE GOT HIS CHAAAAAAAAANCE!!!!"

They're Creeping Up on You: An unpleasant man in a germ-proof apartment is carried away by a not entirely undeserved roach infestation. Again, not the strongest selection in the group, but a worthy one, I think. Not a great experience for claustrophobics, though. Or probably any other phobics, come to think of it. Roaches are awful, even in the damned gutter, but inside your cereal box? (shudder). What I liked best about this is something extremely random, but the way everyone's voices were so distinctive and different. The wife of the man who shot himself on the telephone, she kind of sounded like Ann Margaret or Phyllis Diller maybe, sharp, raspy, and angry . . . and the maintenance man, slow and smooth, through the peep hole in the door; "Oh y e s, Mr. Pratt!" E.G. Marshall was perfectly cast. Can't think of a worse way to die, though. "What happened, bugs got your tongue?" (spastic shudder).
Beheadings, overgrown weeds, drownings, maniacal monkeys, and roaches. There really is something for every horror fan in this collection, and I highly recommend it. Also (just found this out today), the casting of Little Billy, the child in the film's opening whose comic these stories are taken from, is quite interesting. Do you suppose scary stories had any effect on *that* particular actor . . . (?!)