Showing posts with label Time Warp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Time Warp. Show all posts

The Shining by Stephen King (1977): Now I Wanna Be a Good Boy



I really like Will Errickson's blog, Too Much Horror Fiction.  It's like a cave full of horror books from the 60's and 70's.

I also enjoyed this article  on The Shining, which he declared, "unputdownable."  I think it's insightful.  And is reposted here with permission.

By the way, the first cover Errickson posted (the silver) is the version I first read.  I never liked that faceless, silver cover -- but the book grabbed me anyway.  My favorite is actually the first edition.  I wish they would print a paperback with that cover.

Reviews and insights on The Shining are all the more fun now that we have Doctor Sleep.

Be sure to check out, toomuchhorrorfiction.blogspot.co.uk


The Shining by Stephen King (1977): Now I Wanna Be a Good Boy

by Will Errickson

Although it may be Stephen King's most famous horror novel and certainly the one that made him a household name, I must confess that for many years, The Shining was not a novel I really liked. It was never a book that I revisited as I did with many of King's other works, although I knew its reputation was stellar. About five years ago I skimmed through a copy and was even more disheartened as it seemed to me - yes, it's true - poorly written and conceived. Well, I don't know what the hell I was smoking: I picked up my recently-acquired Signet '78 first-edition paperback (only edition with that fantastic, yet easily faded, Mylar cover) on Friday morning, ready to give it another try and... could barely put it down all weekend: this time I got it. I raced through The Shining and barely gave myself the time to jot down a note or page number. It is awesome fun to find that a reread of a once-dismissed book is so rewarding. If you haven't read King, The Shining would be a fine intro.

Original 1977 hardcover

Do I even need to recount the plot and the characters? Jack Torrance is a struggling writer, trying to create believable people and conflicts in his play, when he's had no shortage of conflict in his life. His alcoholism has put serious rifts in his relationships with his wife Wendy and five-year-old son Danny; he's lost his job as prep school English instructor; he's also had two very grave moments of violence. But all that, he hopes - they all hope - that's in the past now that he's hired to be the winter caretaker for the Overlook Hotel, thanks to an huge favor from an old drinking buddy who's cleaned up. Sitting high atop a frigid, panoramic Colorado mountain, the enormous hotel is closed for the season and the only occupants will be the Torrance family.

Jack's feelings of inadequacy are front and center in the opening chapter, in his humiliating job interview with that infamous officious little prick, Mr. Ullman (one of my favorite scenes in the book is when Jack calls Ullman and tells him he's going to write a book about the history of the Overlook and Ullman freaks the fuck out). But Jack knows it's time to do right by his family, and taking this job is the classic point of starting over. He's not drinking and he's writing again, but Jack's about to go on one hell of a dry drunk, and have one motherfuck of a writer's block.

UK hardcover 1977

As for "the shining" itself: Danny's psychic power comes in the form of Tony, a little boy a bit older than Danny who appears inside mirrors and as a tiny shadow down a midnight street, always with some bit of information that Danny would have no other way of knowing. It is this ability of Danny's that the Overlook "wants," so it "employs" Jack's troubled past as it spurs Jack on to murder his family, to truly own the Overlook and inherit its foul nature. You almost ache for Danny, who so wants to please his parents, his daddy most of all (which makes Wendy feel guiltily jealous), who wants his daddy to be well and not do the Bad Stuff. King is great at getting inside kids' heads, their goggle-eyed yet strangely rational perception of the strange adult world that surrounds them.

Thematically, The Shining is one of King's richest. Yes, the Overlook Hotel is a repository of human evil; Jack knows this when, in the basement, he finds the scrapbook containing clippings of its unsavory past. Generations pass on their faults; sons pay for their father's transgressions. Abuse becomes a family trait. These are all very much in the grand tradition of haunted house and Gothic tales. Jack's creativity suffers; the real first sign of his madness is a complete 180-degree reversal of his feelings towards his play's characters. The relationship between Jack and Danny is mirrored in the memories of Jack's relationship with his own father, as both are fraught with a heartbreaking mixture not only of love and concern, but also of violence and alcoholism.

UK paperback 2007

It is the back-story in which King *ahem* shines, as he reveals what he wants when he wants for maximum impact. There's the Overlook's blood-drenched past, of course. We get glimpses throughout the novel of Jack's fearsome father, as well as harrowing moments from his drinking days with a colleague. The tortuous memory of accidentally breaking little Danny's arm plagues him, as does his beating of a debate student of his whom he had to kick off the debate team because of a stutter. Both Danny and this student had destroyed something of Jack's: Danny, as a toddler, pours beer over the manuscript of Jack's play, while the student slashes Jack's car tires. He was drunk when abusing Danny but sober when attacking the student, but no matter: it's all Jack Torrance.

UK paperback 1984

The novel is easily one of the most "unputdownable" - wretched word - I've ever read, at least it was this read. The pacing is relentless, lulling you at one moment and then shocking you the next. Suspense wracks up in the final chapters by interlacing chapters on the family's last stand against Jack - or whatever he is at that point - with Dick Hallorann's journey through the snowstorm, the Overlook head cook who also has "the shining" and is heeding Danny's psychic call. But still, we must ask: are there faults in The Shining? Of course. King's writing can be thin in places, too familiar, too pedestrian; there are times where a character's feelings of horror are told to us, instead of simply letting the horrific scenarios speak for themselves. The constant italicized interior thoughts, or maybe too many flashbacks. That final chapter, perhaps (King has intimated he may write a sequel).

Holy shit, they made a movie out of it?!

But these are to quibble; when you're reading King you know you're not getting an elegant flight of poetic prose or a delicately composed novel of modern manners and foibles. Fuck no! You're getting shrieking blasts of icy terror happening to real people. That might sound like one of the myriad cheesy critical blurbs from the first page ("REAL SCARE-ABILITY!" "DELICIOUSLY SHIVERY READING!" "BACK-PRICKLING!") but I don't know how else to phrase it. My moments of fear? When the wasps come back. When Jack hears his dead father's voice on the radio. When the unmanned elevator starts to clank into use. When Danny enters Room 217. When Wendy turns around and sees Jack. When the long-dead masquerade party guests screech "Unmask! Unmask!" and reveal rotting insect faces...

Mmm, now that's good horror, from a good little boy.

 
toomuchhorrorfiction.blogspot.co.uk

Neurotic Friday The 13th




I enjoyed this 1984 article in the New York Times by Stephen King, titled, "A Bad Year if You Fear Friday the 13th."  HERE.

I had to check this, since there is that other Stephen King who posts economic news.  But I'm pretty sure this is our writer friend, since it's hard to imagine the economist being that concerned about Friday the 13th.

King wrote:
I always take the last two steps on my back stairs as one, making 13 into 12 (there were, after all, 13 steps on the English gallows - up until 1900 or so - and executions were traditionally carried out on Fridays). When I am reading, I will not stop on page 94, page 193, page 382, et al. - the digits of these numbers add up to 13. Such behavior is, of course, neurotic, but I sometimes think it is neurosis and not love that reallymakes the world go round - think of all those basketball players who cross themselves before taking foul shots, not to mention stockbrokers who carry lucky coins and carpenters who wouldn't think of completing a house without first nailing a branch to the rooftree.
King gives special attention to years with a triple Friday the 13th.  For instance, " In 1956 Bela Lugosi died and was buried in his Dracula cloak."

Finally, the 1984 Stephen King informs us that the year he's reallydreading is 1998. "In that triple- whammy year I'll be 49. Can you add 4 and 9?"  So what did happen in 1998?  He gave us Bag Of Bones.  Not so bad!  However, 1999 would be the year that wasn't so friendly.

Thank You Mr. King For The Time Warp



Fifty years ago today president John Kennedy was murdered.  I wasn't alive.  In fact, I wasn't even close to being alive.  The world of John F. Kennedy has always felt very far from me.  A world where men had not walked on the moon; a world where schools were segregated and churches were bombed.  I don't know that world.

Stephen King's novel 11.22.63 does what no history book can do -- it takes the reader on a wild ride back into the early 1960's.  We do not arrive in the past as historians, but on the trail of a story.  Following fictional characters through very real events is an amazing way to tell a story and bring history to life.  I loved it!  Of course, this has been done many times before, but the skilled storytelling from Mr. King is what makes the time travel so real.  I feel like I have indeed been to that era.

Here are some of my notes from my journal as I read 11.22.63

THE TIME MACHINE:

11/22/63 requires a simple leap that isn't very hard for 21st century readers -- time travel is possible.  We've had entire series of novels built on the time travel theory.  Because it is already an established storyline in our culture, King doesn't have to spend forever convincing of the concept.  However, King does some creative rule bending to make his story work -- namely the idea of "re-setting."

A few ways we've gone back in time:
--H.G. Wells novel, "The Time Machine" used a machine.
--Back To The Future, a Delorean.
--Star Trek flew real fast around the sun. (Star Trek 4) Actually, Star Trek often popped through time without a lot of concern for the method used.
--Superman flew real fast around the earth.
--The Gunslinger went through doors.
--In The Time Travelers Wife the traveler manipulated time himself (we think. . .) Of course, the rules of that game involved appearing naked in whatever time he found himself! Glad Jack doesn't have to deal with that little nuance.

Something outside the characters created a time portal.  It's not a machine carefully constructed by mad scientist; it's simply a rabbit hole of some kind.

By not building a time machine, King (brilliantly) fixes several problems.  For one thing, the novel doesn't need to focus on "where will we go?"  The answer is already determined.  The question to be dealt with is instead, "What shall we do when we get there?"  Also, by not constructing a time machine, King avoids the critical question, "Wow, a time machine -- how's that puppy work?"  Doesn't matter how it works!  Don't know.  It is, what Hitchcock would call a kind of "mcGuffin", existing only to propel the plot.

TIME IS ALIVE

King plows new ground in 11.22.63 with the concept of time itself being obdurate. 

What if time wasn't a thing, like a block of wood or even a machine -- what if it was alive?  What if time was insulted when people tried to change it?  And, the biggie -- what if it could fight back?  What if the time line itself was able to protect itself against time-travelers. 

Examine this quote, and notice how the past is indeed alive:
"Because the past is sly as well as obdurate. It fights back. And yes, maybe there was an element of greed involved, too."
King also writes,
"The past is obdurate for the same reason a turtle’s shell is obdurate: because the living flesh inside is tender and defenseless." (p. 827)  Time protects the people within its shell.

Sadie picks up on the theme and tries to relate to it but she uses the wrong word–malelevolent--instead of obdurate. She hasn't experienced the obdurates of the past the way Jake has!  It has beat him to a pulp! 

The addition of time having will is something I suspect future writers will pick up on.

Genre:

11.22.63 is a genre buster.  It is not alternate history!  King spends very little ink discussing the real heart of "what if."  So what is it?

The scenes after the assassination attempt reminded me of a John Grisham novel as the FBI sneaks George out of Dallas.  I enjoyed it, as it is the kind of stuff that King doesn't usually engage in.  Big government agents with their own agenda's out-smarted at points by the ordinary guy.

But 11.22.63 is not a legal thriller.  It may smack at moments of John Grisham; but it's not Grisham!  It's not alternate history.  It's really not sci-fi.  So what is it?  Well, maybe goolosh.  That stuff mom made when she had to clean out the fridges -- little bit of everything.  Maybe a better way to say it is that it transcends genre, and good novels do that, don't they?

As I traveled through the last pages, I realized what this book was.  It swept over me in a wave, and I almost cried out, "OH!"  It was both painful, and obvious.  This sucker is romance!  I'm reading a romance novel!  King isn't interested in time travel, he's interested in characters!  He's not even that interested in the alternate history -- he is laser focused on those people in the book. 

Love is such a messy thing, and gets in the way of good science fiction.  It certainly does in 11.22.63.  I like the love story quite a bit.  That said, I wanted more alternate history.  The love story isn't sappy; this ain't Danielle Steel!  It is engaging because it occurs while you are focused on other things -- and that's the way love is, it happens while other things are going on.  You're supposed to be focused don college classes, graduating, and some girl comes along and -- whoa baby!  How many missions have been messed up by love? 

Time Travel Tricks?

We never really get to learn what the world would be like if Kennedy had not been shot.  Why is that?  Because the science fiction gets in the way.  Yes, the world is changed by Kennedy's escaping assassination, but the future is also changed by other things George does.  So we don't get a "pure" look at the world.  More than that, things are being ripped apart by time travel itself.  I did not see how saving Kennedy would cause a giant earthquake.  The logic escapes me, captain Kirk.

Seriously, now -- which changes history more, 1. JFK escaping death , 2. An earthquake that kills thousands ?  I would say the earthquake!  Thus the alternate history is affected more by the events in California than by anything in Dallas or Washington.

In regards to the alternate history, I really struggled to accept some of the main ideas.  For instance, I think King gives Johnson far too much credit for the Civil rights movement.  I also do not see how Kennedy's living changes anything with Martin Luther King.  (?)  It seems that the civil rights movement had a voice so loud that any American president would eventually be pressed to join in. 

Also, would an American president really use nukes?  I know that's what LBJ warned about. . . but do we want to believe the press offered up in a political ad?  The further away from Kennedy that King got, the more unbelievable I found things. 

He creates mega changes to the flow of history, but then keeps smaller flukes.  He asks us to take a world where there are incredible racial tensions, hate meetings. . . but Hillary is president.  And who calls their meetings "hate" meetings?  Starting to feel like Orwell's 1984 here.  It felt like King just wanted to make Hillary president, so no matter what flow of history he went with, that was the end in sight.

Question Never Answered:
Why does the rabbit hole go to that date.  Is there something they are supposed to do?


Doctor Sleep Journal 1: Time Warp



A note on Journals: The journal entries are not reviews.  They are simply my notes as I read the book.  If you want a review of Doctor Sleep, I recommend the New York Times and Lilja's Library.  Since I'm talking as I read, I'm sure there are "spoilers" -- an absolutely ridiculous idea in my opinion.  If you don't want to know about a book, don't read about it!  But you've been warned and I now feel free to write.
One of the great things about a Stephen King novel is his ability to effectively time warp the reader to time gone by.  In 11/22/63 he took us right back to the 1960's.  I wasn't even alive in the 60's and I felt like I was going back to a place I knew.  Joyland was a trip back to the 1970's.

Often a King book is time warp because I'm reading stuff he wrote years ago.  His books have a flavor of the era they were written in.  The Stand feels like the 1970's.  Even when King updated it, the 70's were still lingering nearby.  King has said he is more an author of the present. What he does so effectively in opening chapters of Doctor Sleep is time warp us back to the late 70's and then the early 80's.

I love the passing references to the peanut farmer and the actor -- even if I do disagree with his assessment of the actor.  Little references to Three's Company bring back a flood of memories that make me smile.  That was such a dumb show!  You remember Three's Company, right?  It's the one about the big misunderstanding. . . every single episode!

The trip into a movie theater is great, as King puts Raiders of The Lost Ark right onto the screen.  It's cool to have a story take place in front of a backdrop that's so personally engaging.  King uses things most of us remember to transport us into  his scenes.

The story moves almost seamlessly from The Shining to this new novel.  Danny is still Danny, Wendy still herself (what little I've seen of her thus far) and Dick is just as charming as ever.  I love scenes were Danny and Dick can sit and have a private conversation just in their heads.

After some spooky-doo scenes that are well worth the price of admission, King does something he didn't do much of at all in the original novel; He turns to other characters.  In The Shining, almost every scene involved one of the three family members.  It was a tight, introspective novel that was great, if not a little slow at points.  But with deep character development already completed, King is now able to keep the action flowing and introduce new characters.  The story no widens as we learn about new people with special gifts.

The scenes thus far are short, crisp and well written.  King's narrative voice is a little more sassy than it was in The Shining; a sign of growing confidence I suspect.  Can we trust that actor, Mr. King?  Of course we can!

Watch out for rattlesnakes, y'all.

THE SHINING: I remember that world

the LA freeway in 1977
Stephen King books are written for the NOW -- meaning, whatever the now is when they are written.  The present is always before you in a Stephen King book.  That means that if you read a new King novel, it will be full of fresh, delightful cultural references.  If you read an oldie, it will be full of bits of history you might have forgotten.

I find myself identifying deeply with The Shining, because I feel like I've been to that world.  In so many ways reading The Shining is like a personal trip down memory lane.  I don't know these people, but I am familiar with their alien environment.

It's all in the little  things. Jack drives a yellow VW.  My aunt and uncle had a yellow VW, and my family had a blue one.  The year, late 1970's -- same time frame the Shining was written in.  So, the scene where Jack pulls up in his VW is especially powerful to me, since I remember playing in my families driveway, and looking up to see my father coming in his VW Bug.  My mother hurried me to get out of the way -- I think I was playing with toy cars.

A big deal is made in the book of Jack having a phone installed -- and again, I feel like I vaguely remember that world..  A world that used microphones to record things;a world where boilers  still had to be checked 3 times a day.  A world where someone can't just cell phone or text to announce the outcome of a job interview. A world where Richard Nixon was long gone -- but his memory still stung.

Who can really say they remember the 70's with  any kind of fondness?  Well, I can.  I don't remember it well, mostly just feelings -- but mostly all good.  In 1977 the Apple II went on sale, the average income was $15,000 and the average home cost under $50,000.  Get this, the average monthly rent  was $240.  In theaters Star Wars was released.   Meaning that in 1976, people didn't know what Star Wars was!

Also released was a movie named Roller coaster  Not great on plot, but it was  filmed at Magic Mountain (partly) and I like it because I can spot old rides.  Notice in the movie The American Revolution, the first roller coaster to make a full loops, does not have shoulder straps.  Magic Mountain was also Wally World  in National Lampoons Vacation.  And, again, notice that back then Revolution required no shoulder straps!  They only added the harness because people thought they would fall out, even though that's impossible.

By the way, goodreads lists The Shining as #1 on their list of "Most Popular Books Published In 1977." (www.goodreads.com)

Do you remember this world. . .



A Note About Jack:

King objected to the portrayal Jack Nicholson gave Jack Torrance. Reading the novel again, I can really see what was missed.  Kubrick's Jack is crazy; King's Jack is broken.  The difference is that crazy Jack is always seething just under the surface.  He is not tender toward his wife or son, just completely self  absorbed.

The Jack of the novel is more complex.  He deeply loves his wife and son and sacrifices for them.  He plays with Danny, changes diapers when Danny was a baby and fights to keep his marriage together.

When Kubrick's Jack goes nuts and kills everyone, there  is absolutely no surprise.  It's crazy to watch it unfold, but you could tell he was nutso from the get-go.  King's Jack  displays moments of rage, but in the early novel King is careful not to show us that Jack in action -- instead we see the Jack who has to live with the consequences of his bad  behavior.  It's like seeing the aftermath of a nuke and having to imagine what exactly the force was that  brought on the devastation   Only later  will King show us the nuke in action.

The Shining, Journal #2

King: Writing Is What God Put Me On Earth To Do



I enjoyed this 1981 PEOPLE magazine article, titled, "For Years, Stephen King's Firestarter Was Wife Tabitha; Now She Burns to Write, Too." (www.people.com)
What's kind of cool about old dated articles is you see how they come out.  Often you read a magazine just a few years old, and the couples have broken up and the love is gone.  But when love endures the story is more interesting.

Here's an interesting quote:
The marriage is built upon a healthy combination of respect and friendly give-and-take. "We have a pact not to argue about drinking, hair and dope," says Tabby, but everything else is fair game.
We know now that Tabby would eventually step in and force King to make some hard decisions.  Consider this: If she had not stepped in, think how messed up he would have been.  So in a way -- all you dark tower freaks -- she saved the Dark Tower.

This article actually sent me searching for my copy of Tabitha King's Small World.  No, I did not find it right away.  No, I have not read it.  But it sounds interesting -- "a fantasy about a mad scientist and his minimizer."

I like this:
Both concede that Small World's sales have been boosted by the fact that Tabby is Steve's wife. "I put 10 years into helping his career," she reasons, "so if his name helps me with mine, I think it's legitimate." 
When the article was written (and I think this is still true) the King's saw writing very differently.
But Tabby says that "writing is only the frosting on my cake. I'm whole without it." For Steve it is different. "If I weren't writing," he admits, "I might be like that guy in the Texas tower. Writing is what God put me on earth to do."
By the way, we know that during the time that this article was written, King was working hard on a book called Cannibals.  

Youtube: 1982 King at University of Dayton


Here is King speaking at University of Dayton in 1982.  King is engaging, funny and very lively.  This is a lot of fun!
"One reason I write is to deal with the horror.  The other reason is to do something with a sense of wonder."
Oh.  . . and he talks a little about where he gets his ideas.  In particular, it is neat that he talks about the monster under the bridge.  Interesting because IT was still in the works.

He also reads The Reach.









Ten Thousand Magazines


I think magazines that feature articles about Stephen King, or written by King, are a lot of fun!  It's neat to see how King was viewed at a particular time.  I've been slowly collecting Stephen King magazines for the last few years.  It's a fun, easy collection to build.  The magazines don't usually cost much, even the old stuff.

So here's what I like:

1. Old articles show  us how King was viewed at a particular time.  

2. The magazines also show what was happening in the world around.  You can spot prices, politics and entertainment now gone.  

So, I'm going to do a series of articles about Stephen King magazines.  We'll start with the number 10,000 and count down.  Why 10k?  Because I believe I won't run out of numbers!


Doctor Gash's Trip Back to The 80's




I enjoyed Dread Central’s “Doctor Gash's Tip of the Scalpel: A Tribute to Stephen King Part 2.”  It is a time warp back to the 80's.

We all know that this was a particularly productive era for King, giving us the first glimpse of The Dark Tower, Fire Starter, Cujo, IT and so much more.  The article focuses particularly on Misery as a center piece to King’s work in the 80's.

It was also an era of Stephen King movies.  It seemed in those days if King wrote it, someone was ready to fork over the money to put it on screen.  Compare that to these days, when if King wrote it, someone is ready to talk about putting up the money to get it on that big screen.

When discussing The Runningman movie, Dr. Gash points out that it starred not one, but two U.S. Governors: Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jesse Ventura.  The Running Man’s similarities to The Hunger Games is not lost on the good doctor, who writes, “One can only speculate how much, if any, inspiration Suzanne Collins drew from The Running Man for her uber-hit The Hunger Games books, but one does have to acknowledge the similarities.”

Dr. Gash calls 1982 and 1983 the most impressive years of the decade.  King gave us: The Dark Tower, Christine, Pet Sematery, Cycle of the Warewolf. . . and the list goes on.

I enjoyed this article a lot.  I wish Dr. Gash had honed in closer to IT, as I think it is actually the center piece of the decade.

The full article is HERE.

11.22.63 Journal #9: Thinking It Over



That was a wonderful read! 

Because it is so different from King's other works, I'd hesitate to say things like, "It was his best!"  It was different -- and wonderful -- and difficult -- challenging and at moments mesmerizing.

Audio:

I read this book via the audio edition.  Yes, that counts as reading, Bryant. 

Craig Wasson makes James Hosty sound like Jimmy Stewart.  And that makes Hosty all out lovable to me.  One problem in listening is that you cannot hear quotation marks. There have been a couple of times when I was not sure if George was thinking something, or saying it.  Wasson's reading is very energetic.  He performs as much as reads, which I enjoy.  An example of someone who gets out of the stories way is Grover Gardner, who is often accused of being dry.

Genre:

11.22.63 is a genre buster.  It is not alternate history!  King spends very little ink discussing the real heart of "what if."  So what is it?

The scenes after the assassination attempt reminded me of a John Grisham novel as the FBI sneaks George out of Dallas.  I enjoyed it, as it is the kind of stuff that King doesn't usually engage in.  Big government agents with their own agenda's out-smarted at points by the ordinary guy.

But 11.22.63 is not a legal thriller.  It may smack at moments of John Grisham; but it's not Grisham!  It's not alternate history.  It's really not sci-fi.  So what is it?  Well, maybe goolosh.  That stuff mom made when she had to clean out the fridges -- little bit of everything.  Maybe a better way to say it is that it transcends genre, and good novels do that, don't they?

As I traveled through the last pages, I realized what this book was.  It swept over me in a wave, and I almost cried out, "OH!"  It was both painful, and obvious.  This sucker is romance!  I'm reading a romance novel!  King isn't interested in time travel, he's interested in characters!  He's not even that interested in the alternate history -- he is laser focused on those people in the book. 

Love is such a messy thing, and gets in the way of good science fiction.  It certainly does in 11.22.63.  I like the love story quite a bit.  That said, I wanted more alternate history.  The love story isn't sappy; this ain't Danielle Steel!  It is engaging because it occurs while you are focused on other things -- and that's the way love is, it happens while other things are going on.  You're supposed to be focused don college classes, graduating, and some girl comes along and -- whoa baby!  How many missions have been messed up by love? 

Time Travel Tricks?

We never really get to learn what the world would be like if Kennedy had not been shot.  Why is that?  Because the science fiction gets in the way.  Yes, the world is changed by Kennedy's escaping assassination, but the future is also changed by other things George does.  So we don't get a "pure" look at the world.  More than that, things are being ripped apart by time travel itself.  I did not see how saving Kennedy would cause a giant earthquake.  The logic escapes me, captain Kirk.

Seriously, now -- which changes history more, 1. JFK escaping death , 2. An earthquake that kills thousands ?  I would say the earthquake!  Thus the alternate history is affected more by the events in California than by anything in Dallas or Washington.

In regards to the alternate history, I really struggled to accept some of the main ideas.  For instance, I think King gives Johnson far too much credit for the Civil rights movement.  I also do not see how Kennedy's living changes anything with Martin Luther King.  (?)  It seems that the civil rights movement had a voice so loud that any American president would eventually be pressed to join in. 

Also, would an American president really use nukes?  I know that's what LBJ warned about. . . but do we want to believe the press offered up in a political ad?  The further away from Kennedy that King got, the more unbelievable I found things. 

He creates mega changes to the flow of history, but then keeps smaller flukes.  He asks us to take a world where there are incredible racial tensions, hate meetings. . . but Hillary is president.  And who calls their meetings "hate" meetings?  Starting to feel like Orwell's 1984 here.  It felt like King just wanted to make Hillary president, so no matter what flow of history he went with, that was the end in sight. 

In The End. . .

In the end, the alternate reality doesn't matter squat anyway!  In fact, none of it matters except the last strands of a love story.  That's what you're left with that's real. 

The middle section definitely lagged.  See, I didn't realize back there that this was a love story.  Now it all makes sense!  That stuff that felt slow is what was really the meat of this novel.  I would read it again with more patience for the character development and less urging for King to "get on with it!"

Does the book lag at points?  yes.  Is it a good novel?  Absolutely!  Is it King's best?  I don't know.  And neither do you!  It should be enough to say, that was a good book.

Time Travel At Its Best



I'm really enjoying 11.22.63 !  This is one fantastic book.  As with all good time travel stories, King doesn't spend long on the how; it's about the story. 

So, here are my top 5 favorite time travel movies:

1. Back to the Future.  The second one got a little wearisome when they almost endangered their original mission.  King fixes these kinds of issues with the "reset" concept.

2. The Final Countdown.  Have you seen this one?  A modern (1980's) aircraft carrier goes through a storm and comes out in 1941, days before Pearl Harbor.  Do they dare use modern technology to alter history?  I don't think this was big in theaters, but I think it's great.

3. The Time Machine.  Based on H.G. Wells novel, the original Time Machine is very well done.  The story is great.  Also enjoyed the episode of Big Bang Theory when the guys bought the original Time Machine prop.  Good stuff.

4. Star Trek 4, The Voyage Home.  Sling shot around the sun, and you create a time warp that wills end you to the exact date you want.  Sound stupid?  It is -- but so is a Delorean time machine and a closet of a diner!  Anyway, of all Star Trek's time warping, this is just about the best there is.  A probe arrives at earth, wanting to talk to extinct humpback whales.  The Enterprise shoots back in time to save the whales. 

5. Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure.  This is serious history here!  We meet Abe Lincoln -- and a cast of mostly forgettable characters as Bill and Ted travel through time in a phone booth to get a passing grade in history class.  Beats out Terminator on my list!  And does Superman count?  he did fly real fast around earth to bring Lois back to life. . . was that time travel? 

Okay, your turn!

Stephen King’s Rules for Time Travel



Here is a Wired interview with Stephen King about the mechanics of time travel.  They cover: "the grandfather paradox, and the scariest thing about trying to change history."  The grandfather paradox is the question: What if you went back in time and killed your own grandfather?  They also discuss the "butterfly effect" which is dealt with in detail in the novel.

Here's a clip from their discussion of the "reset" idea:
King: The idea of the reset was one of the more interesting things about the book to me. You can get the idea from computers, where you can delete all this material and start over again and it never even leaves a mark. You just highlight everything, bop Delete, and it’s gone.

Wired: Well, on a computer you think it’s gone, but it’s actually not.

King: It’s like in the story. They think it’s a complete reset, but the guardian tells Jake that it really isn’t. It looked that way to you, but that stuff was still there.

NINETEEN SIXTY THREE (part one)


All constant readers know the importance of the sixties to Stephen King's work.  This heavy emphasis in his novels is a reflection of the impact the decade made on King personally.

I was born in 1973.  So I have fond memories of. . . the late 70's and 80's !  I have never thought well of the 60's.  That was my parents generation, and in general I think it was a pretty messed up era.  My perception is that some pretty bad stuff come out of the 60's.  The 60's gave us: Vietnam, Hippies and intense racial strife. 

But the 60's were much more than that.  It was an era when our nation was coming of age.  Several King novels deal with the 60's.  By setting alone, King is able to give history lessons that would make my high school teachers drool. 

The sixties also gave us the Twilight Zone, John Kennedy, The Jetsons, Cool Elvis and a host of other things.

1963, the year King's next novel focuses on, was the year
  • Hitchcock gave us The Birds.
  • Lassie was popular on television, as was Andy Griffith and the Dick Van Dyke Show.  Hold on, that's not all -- mom and pop were also busy watching My Favorite Martian. 
  • Gas cost 29 cents per gallon.  A loaf of bread was 22 cents.
  • The average cost of a new car was $3,233.
  • Audio cassettes hit the market. 
  • A brand spankin new house would cost you $12,650.
  • Average income per year was $5,807 per year.  (So don't get too excited bout those house prices, eh!)  Minimum wage was $1.25.  A stamp cost 0.05.
  • AT&T introduced touch tone phones.  Of course, it would take a while for them to catch on!  I still have a rotary cell phone. . .
  • Zip codes were implemented.  HOLD ON!  We didn't have zip codes until 1963?  Seriously?!
  • James Meredith was the first black to graduated from the university of Mississippi in 1963.
  • 1963 also gave us -- are you ready for this -- THE LAVA LAMP!
  • Pull tabs for soda were introduced.
  • The Beatles gave us "I want to hold your hand." 
  • To Kill a Mocking Bird was released in theaters, as was Cleopatra and Lawrence of Arabia.
  • Martin Luther King gave his "I Have A Dream" speech in 1963.
  • Pope John the 23 died. 
  • Alcatraz closed.
  • The Ku Klux Klan dynamited a Baptist Church in Birmingham in Alabama, resulting in the deaths of 4 young girls.
TIME WARP TO 1963





The Stephen King Companion


I love this book! 

My tattered copy of George Beahm's "The Stephen King Companion" is well worn.  This was the first of many (MANY) books I would own about Stephen King. 

I purchased this book as a teenager at a real brick and mortar bookstore. It was probably 1990.  This was before the era of Internet and instant information.  What we knew, we read in books!  Sheesh, I sound old!  But after reading The Stand and the first couple Dark Tower books, I was totally hooked on Stephen King.  I was way over my head when it came to this new world of books.  I had read a lot of classics, but King spoke to me in a way no one else had.

George Beahm's book was an absolutely wonderful find.  It gave a short biography, explained his work, and best of all -- acted as something of a scrap book.   It is full of short articles, fun tidbits, reviews and even an interview with King.  For someone new to the world of Stephen King, this was exactly what I needed to guide my way.

I still enjoy this companion book quite a bit.  It reflects how King was seen in the late eighties.  What was being said, how was his work viewed.  In particular, before he brought an end to Castle Rock, before the accident. 

So what's inside?  A short tour of the Stephen King Companion:

PART ONE: The Real World Of Stephen King.
This section focuses on what King is really like.  It relies heavily on Douglas E Winter's work.  Also in this section, Beahm refers to King as "the boogeyman of Bangor, Maine."  Interesting, since Beahm would later write a book titled "Stephen King, America's Favorite Boogieman."

  • Chronology.  Personal Life.  Published Books (up through Dark Tower 2) , Books About King, Movies, TV Shows, Audiotapes, Screenplays and Teleplays.
  • The Long Strange Trip Of Stephen King.  Charts something like a publishing biography, telling the story of King in order of his published works.
  • King's Ten Favorite Fantasy-Horror Novels
  • Stephen King -- Actor. 
  • The playboy interview, with Eric Norden
  • An evening With Stephen King.  (Like a transcript of King's visit to Virginia Beach).  This includes an extended discussion about banned books.
  • WZON, "Rocking In The Dead Zone!"
  • Article by Donald M. grant, "Stephen King as Breckinridge Elkins?"
  • Stephen King trivia.  (Did you know the most "expensive flop" was Carrie the musical?  By the end of 1990, there were 29 books about King.)
  • A Writer In her Own Right, Tabitha King.
  • The House That Horror Built.  Kings Bangor home and office.  Includes article "A Girl's dream Coms True In Mansion Fit for Kings" by Joan H. Smith of the News Staff.  There is an interesting picture in this section of Kings indoor pool.
  • Article by Terry Steel titled "Wrought Iron" about the fence and gate around the house.  (I wonder if these names are real!  Terry Steel writes an article titled Wrought Iron. . .)
PART TWO: The Unreal World Of Stephen King
This section looks at the work of Stephen King.  It includes:

  • Fans Letters To Stephen King
  • A Self Quiz, rating yourself as a King fan.  Ten stages of fan!
  • Castle Rock: The official Stephen King Newsletter.  After discussing the end of the publication, we are given a PO Box tow rite to for back issues.  Ah, if only it was still that easy!
  • Horrorfest, A Stephen King Convention.
  • "My Say" by Stephen King.  An opinion article from Publishers Weekly (about book publishing).  There is a great picture here of Stephen and Tabby signing copies of Danse Macabre and Small World.
  • A Kingly Collectible: My Pretty Pony.  Discussing the strange Whitney Museum's limited edition of My Pretty Pony.
  • Lord John Press
  • Philtrum Press: King's Book Publishing Company.  (The Plant, Eyes of the Dragon.) 
  • Specialty Publishers.  Discusses limited editions and small presses.  This includes a listing of specialty publishers who have released Stephen King books.  Beahm included P.O. box contact info so that fans could purchase these items.  Publishers include: Dark Harvest, Donald M. Grant, Hill House Publishers, Land of Enchantment, Lord John Press, Scream Press, Starmont House, Underwood-Miller and Phantasia Press.
  • Specialty Dealers. 
  • Starmont House.  Includes, Titles by Michael R. Collings. 
  • Audio publishing.  Discusses his relationship with Recorded Books.  Of course, this is when audio books was a rather new idea.  It also included a half page blurb by King abotu reading his books aloud.  Under "current offerings" we are given:  The Mist, which sold for $19.95.  Again, if only!  Also, all of different seasons, and Skeleton Crew were offered by Recorded Books.
  • "The Mist" on Audiocassette (A Sound Idea).  Discusses the 3D sound adaptation of The Mist.
  • Thinner on Audiocassette.  This actually was the recording that caused King to refuse future works be abridged.  (Except, he did allow Desperation to be abridged.  I don't know why.)
  • Michael R. Collings, An Interview.  (The book is worth this interview!)
  • Stephen King and the Critics, A Personal Perspective by Michael R. Collings.
  • Article: "King Helps Spearhead Censorship Referendum Defeat" by Christopher Spruce
  • Writing: Clive Barker on Stephen King, Horror, and E.C. Comics.
  • An Interview With Harlan Ellison
  • Terror in Toontown, by Howard Wornom
PART THREE: A Look At The Books
This section is a book by book look at King's published and unpublished works.  It is presented alphabetically -- which seems a little strange!  The natural way to approach the books would have seemed chronologically.   I really liked this section, and wore each page out as I read the King book.  It was like having my own notes as I went through the books.
  • Overview of the books.
  • An Interview With Douglas E. Winter

Pet Sematary Book Signing


I like this stuff. . .

This is probably from 1983.

Check out those hardcover copies of Pet Sematary and Christine.  In the news story, King says he doesn't know why people to it.  Of course, if any of those people still ahve their signed copies of either of those books, they're worth a lot now!  At the time King was just hitting the scene really big. 

Twilight Zone Magazine Bachman Ad


My February 1985 issue of the Twilight Zone magazine landed in my mailbox today. I do love ebay!
.
I will post more on the articles inside, and the King/Straub interview. I love going through old magazine's and seeing what was happening at the time. As I thumbed through aging pages, something cool caught my eye. It was an ad. Later that year, 1985, King would be exposed as Richard Bachman. But in February, the general reading public had not been let in on the secret. The ad is for Thinner.
.
That's interesting, because Bachman had run under the radar until Thinner. His books were not met with much publicity. In fact, they were usually released as simple paperbacks.

Time Travel

I have noticed several articles today with headings along the lines of "Stephen King to tackle Time Travel in next book." As if he hasn't dealt with this before. To clarify, what appears to be original for King with 11/23/63 is that it is alternate history. I cannot think ofa book where he wrestled with the issues related to alternative history.
.
But time travel has certainly been done by King. Where? Well, most noteably in The Drawing Of The Three. But it happens throughout the Dark Tower novels. In Drawing of the Three, the medium is a doorway that delivers Roland into different era's of our world. I love the scene where Eddie hides the drugs in Roland's world, using the doorway as a means of transporting illegal drugs. It's brilliant! I believe in Dark Tower 7, the Ka tet actually change the timeline. Forgive me for not being more specific, I was holding on for dear life trying to keep up with that novel!
.
There were hints of time displacement in other books. For instance, Christine was stuck in the 1950's. I wrote this in my Christine Journal #6: "The radio is set for a 50's oldies station. When Arnie or Leah try to change it, it always goes back to the 50's music. Stranger, as Arnie drives he begins to hear news casts from the 50's. Warnings about Russian build up and a response from Ike. Retro news, Arnie wonders. But the reader is pretty sure -- this isn't a rebroadcast! Christine is somehow drawing the radio station up out of time."

1978 The Stand Journal 2: Year Of The Stand



1978 was a long time ago in a Galaxy very far away. I was five years old. I distantly remember that strange era that made up the seventies. They were awkward, and tense, and everything was pretty uncool. Our hair, our clothes (my mom made me a polyester suit I wore to school, it was itchy) and even our TV was a little nutty. Come on, a show about the California Highway Patrol. . . every week!
.
The Stand has been given several makeovers. First when King updated the work in 1990. Later it was given a nice new look with the mini-series, and most recently it has been updated with the comic books. But I want to go back -- way back to 1978 when the Stand was originally released. Of course, that is not exactly the year King was writing the Stand in. It is the year people began reading.
.
On Star Trek if you want to time warp, you have to sling-shot around the sun. Here, you just have to scroll down! So come on, let's go back to 1978.
.
1978. . .
.
Norman Rockwell died that year and Charlie Chaplain's remains were stolen. Jimmy Carter was president, and inflation was on the rise big time! There was a coal strike that was not helping the situation. Carter did authorize the minting of the Susan B. Anthony dollar. That went over well. The Federal debt was only 776.6 billion. That's all! We almost could have written a check! A stamp cost 0.13 cents. This dreary sense of America is palpable in the Stand.
.
Ford was advertising it's new car, stating "Tomorrow's idea from Ford is here!" Ford Fairmont Futura. $4,267. AVON was marketing TEMPO to black women.
.
In 1978 there was no Internet, debit cards, kindle, DVD's, mini-van or AIDS. There were also no cellphones. In fact, if you needed to make a call on the run, you dived in to a phone booth. Remember those? Superman's favorite changing room! And most phones still required you spin a dial.
.
Politics:
.
Dianne Feinstein, now a senator from California, succeeded murdered George Moscone as mayor of San Francisco. Jerry Brown was governor of California -- the first time. The Los Angeles strangler was on the loose (later known as the Hillside Strangler).
.

And then there was Jimmy Carter. Sure, I know what you're thinking: He's not in The Stand -- right? Wrong! He is in The Stand. Well, not by name, but it doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to spot him. He's playing the role of President, so it sorta makes it easy to find Waldo here.
.
Carter was a peanut farmer and governor of the state of Georgia. He was known for his big smile (grin) and Christian virtues. This is from chapter 16, when the president decides to reign in the military.
.
"You know who that was on the phone."
"It was really him, then?"
"The old Georgia Giant himself. I've been relieved. The clod-hopper releved me, Len. Of course, I knew it was coming. But it still hurts. Hurts like hell. It hurts coming fromt that grinning sack" p.116, paperback.
.
That's chapter 22, page 166 in the revised. And in this version there is no "Georgia Giant" hint offered up, he is simply called "The President." Why? Because Jimmy wasn't in office when the Stand was rewritten. By the way, notice that just between thsoe two scenes, the revised edition gave 40 pages of extra build up.
.
Religion:
.
Of interest to me, that was the year of three Popes! In august, Pope Paul 6 died and was replaced by 65-year old John Paul 1. But he died on September 28, after only 34 days in office. John Paul 2 became pope on September 28, 1978.

.
Religion was actually in a pretty crazy state that year. It was also the year of the Jones Town deaths. Followers of Jim Jones drank the kool-aid, giving their lives to Jones after the murder of a Congressman and reporters. It is interesting that The Stand is released amist such religious chaos. Flagg is a Jim Jones type, who's followers (like Jones') will all meet a tragic end. Nukes -- kool-aid, what's the real difference?
.
The Stand is a deeply spiritual novel. From the dreams, to Mother Abigail to the devil himself -- it is the stroy of good verses evil. Of course, the 1978 hardcover sported a drawing of good and evil hacking it out. And what is Flagg in the end? Just another Jim Jones! Or, reverse it; what was Jim Jones? Posessed by Flagg.
.
Movies:

At the movies, you could see:
Jaws 2,
Animal House,
the Wiz,
Superman,
Halloween,
Grease,
Invasion of the Body Snatchers,
Heaven Can Wait,
and of course: Attack of the Killer Tomatoes. Hey, that was a good movie! By the way, there is a remake of Killer Tomatoes coming out this year -- I think.
.
Top it off with a viewing of Capicorn One, starring OJ Simpson. Capicorn One played on the nations doubt of government, suggesting even the space program was a hoax. A similar mistrust of government is expressed in The Stand -- but much better executed.

Challanger Explosion & S.K. Universe


"We will never forget them, nor the last time we saw them, this morning, as they prepared for their journey and waved goodbye and slipped the surly bonds of earth to touch the face of God."
-- Ronald Reagan.
.
25 years ago today my friend Ryan -- who was usually full of nutty stories -- arrived late to school. "You won't believe what happened today," he said. Well, when he told me he was watching TV and that the space shuttle just blew up, he was right -- I didn't believe him!
.
Hard to think that was 25 years ago. If feels like yesterday.
.
King mentions the Challenger explosion in Rose Madder. The novel is about battered women. Anna Stevenson explains to Rose that when the Challenger exploded, there was a woman who experienced intense guilt because she had written letters encouraging manned space flights. Her point is simply that battered women are able to feel personal guilt about things that have nothing to do with them.
.
The disaster is cited again in Dreamcatcher, as a metaphor. "To say that Beavers marriage didn't work would be like saying that the launch of challenger space shuttle went a little bit wrong."
.
Stirring Truth Into Fiction
King's ability to reference and draw from our common story as Americans is part of what makes him such a great story teller. His novels wind through our bigger history, citing things and events that deeply touch us. Our memories are jarred at some of these events, and King doesn't overplay his hand at this point. But like a master, King uses our shared past to add depth and familiarity to his stories. King's world becomes a little more real when his characters remember events I too remember.
.
By the way, 1986 is also the year Stand By Me came out in theaters. Nothing to do with challenger, except that they shared the same year.
.
Twisted Memories:
Now I want to point out something strange. I have read two writers already today who mention how memory of the challenger disaster is distorted. They remember things happening that day that didn't actually happen until later. Time is messed up in their head in relation to that event. Know what -- it's that way for me, too. I remember being 9 or 10. But I was 12. that's crazy! I remember seeing it all from a child's point of view; but I remember being 12 and being confident I was no longer thinking like a child. I found myself thinking, "I couldn't have been that old!" Anyone else out there finding mysterious mental vertigo when it comes to the challenger disaster?
.
For more on memory distortion related to the Challenger Disaster and Stephen King, see this article published a couple of years ago titled "Twisted Memories." http://iwanticewater.wordpress.com/2009/10/25/twisted-memories/

2003 NPR Interview With King


This is from November 19, 2003. King was the recipient of a lifetime achievement award from National Book Foundation. I always enjoy interviews with King because he is very energetic; and not in that awkward Tom Cruise way! No jumping on the sofa with Opera, King is always laser tight on subject and very personable.
.
Here is the article that accompanied the interview:
Critics have rarely embraced Stephen King as a serious writer. But the prolific novelist, best known for his horror stories, is about to enter some serious company. The National Book Foundation is honoring the best-selling author with a lifetime achievement award whose previous recipients have included Arthur Miller, Eudora Welty and John Updike. King discusses the award and his writing with NPR's Susan Stamberg.
.
Beginning with 1974's Carrie, King has published 40 books and more than 200 short stories. The author of The Shining, Pet Sematary, The Green Mile and The Shawshank Redemption resents being pegged in one genre.
.
"It's always made me uneasy to be called a horror writer or a suspense writer," King tells Stamberg on Morning Edition. "They're hooks to hang your hat on and I reject them. I've never denied that I was a horror writer, but I've never introduced myself as that either. I see myself as Stephen King. I'm an American novelist, and that's it."
.
.
By the way, I was interviewed once by NPR. Well, actually, I just barely got a single quote in. http://www.npr.org/player/v2/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=1510901&m=1512465