Showing posts with label Cujo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cujo. Show all posts

Dee Wallace Describes CUJO Trauma




Check out the Fox interview with Dee Wallace. (HERE)  She has quite a bit to say about her work on Cujo.

Fox News: It’s been said “Cujo” was the most difficult film for you to make, but one that you’re the proudest of. How so?
Wallace: My God, it was the hardest thing I’ve ever done mentally, physically, emotionally. You have to understand you’re working with a dog – an incredibly trained dog – actually there were 13 dogs that played Cujo. Then there was a young kid of 6 and me. So I had to absolutely be on the whole time. What an emotional ride. And every time you see a scene, we probably shot it 15 times from different angles. That’s a huge amount of emotional output. And what most people don’t understand is that your body does not differentiate between a perceived threat and an actual threat. So I blew all my adrenals out because for eight weeks, literally, I was in fight or flight.

They treated me for exhaustion for about three weeks afterward. I still take raw adrenal supplements because I just blew them out from all the emotional work. And physically. Physically alone was incredibly demanding. But I look at the film and think that I went as far as I could go, as truthful as I could go. If I can do that in every performance, I will die a happy actress.



Fox News: What did Stephen King think of the film?
Wallace: He was down there for the first couple days of shooting... He often touts "Cujo" as the best film rendition of any of his writing and that I should have received an award nomination. He’s really generous with his praise. My job is to really honor in the most authentic way what the writer and the director want to bring to life. I feel a real duty to my fans to do that in the most truthful way I can.

Stephen King's Seven Scariest Cars, Trucks & Trains



Steve Levenstein posted an article at inventorspot.com titled, "Stephen King's Seven scariest cars, Trucks and Trains."

Here's the list, but check out the article:
Green Goblin Truck from Maximum Overdrive
George Stark's 1966 Olds Toronado
From A Buick 8's Buick 8
Pet Sematary's ORINCO Peterbilt Truck (OH YEAH!)
Cujo vs 1978 Ford Pinto
Blaine the Mono (Sorry, Blaine didn't scare me)
Christine: 1958 Plymouth Fury (yep!)

Cujo (Documentary)

This is a wonderful documentary on CUJO.  I was particularly interested in the discussion of why Stephen King's screenplay was rejected.  Why would the authors screenplay be turned down?  Well, according tot eh documentary, because King's rendition strayed too far from the novel!

King later encouraged the film makers to let the boy live, even though he died in the novel.  It is King's willingness to allow his work to have a little give that has allowed Hollywood to be successful in translating his work his work to film.

Check it out at: youtu.be CUJO

The Cujo We Love



Now that's a Good dog!

Hey Hollywood. . . this is the Cujo we love. . . don't mess with it.  Don't rethink it.  Don't reinterpret it.  Don't re-imagine it.  Don't "re-tell" it.

Sun Classic Pictures posted on their website:
LANG ELLIOTT, PRESIDENT & CEO OF SUNN CLASSIC PICTURES, INC., ANNOUNCED THAT SUNN PLANS TO PRODUCE THE REMAKE OF “CUJO” THIS YEAR REPRESENTING THE 30TH ANNIVERSARY SINCE SUNN PRODUCED AND DISTRIBUTED THE ORIGINAL “CUJO” MOTION PICTURE IN 1983, BASED UPON STEPHEN KING’S NOVEL. (www.sunnclassicpicturesinc)

Cujo and The Shining Back To Hollywood

photo credit: www.liljas-library.com
Today the Hollywood Reporter posted that Glen Mazzara is "in negotiations to pen the screenplay" to a project called "Overlook Hotel."  The story will serve as a prequel to The Shining.  This was actually hard for me to imagine until I read Stephen King's original opening to The Shining called "Before The Play."  An edited version appeared in TV guide.  (talkstephenking.blogspot. before the play)

My favorite website, Lilja's Library, posted this news:
SUNN CLASSIC ANNOUNCES CUJO FOR 2013
Lang Elliott, President & CEO of Sunn Classic Pictures, Inc., announced that Sunn plans to produce the remake of “CUJO” this year representing the 30th Anniversary since Sunn produced and distributed the original “CUJO” motion picture in l983, based upon Stephen King’s novel. The l983 version was highly successful at the worldwide box-office and, compared with today’s inflation and higher ticket prices, the box-office would be well over $225 million even without ancillary sales (i.e., DVD, cable, free television, pay-per-view, etc.).
Of course, the big question is -- why?  Cujo was a good book, and a better movie.  Could a remake be better  than the original?  Carrie could justify a remake because the original deviated so far from the book -- though it was great.  But Cujo actually made the story better!  If Sunn wants to drop money on a Stephen King project, how about CELL, The Sun Dog, From a Buick 8. Or how about a remake of The Runningman.

King films that need a remake:

  • The Runningman
  • Langoliers
  • Desperation
  • Needful Things (mini-series please)
  • IT
  • Firestarter
  • Dreamcatcher
Some projects you hope will just go away. . . like Children of the Corn.  

What King movies would you like to see remade?

Is Cujo A Metaphor?



Check out James Smythe's most recent update to his rereading Stephen King adventure.  Week 11, Smythe takes us back to the world of Cujo at www.guardian.co.uk.

I love Smythe's note that Cujo doesn't pause to bother with chapters and things like that.  It's "a constant rush of words, darting between characters and with reminiscing periods of backstory, but always pushing forward."

Smythe notes King's increased abuse of addictive substances is reflected in his books, and ultmatly Cujo is a metaphor for addiction.  Though King admits that he was in the throws of serious drug abuse when he wrote Cujo -- so serious he does not remember writing it!  -- I have trouble with the rabid dog being a symbol of drug use or addiction.  He further sees Tad's death as a metaphor for  drug addiction.

Smythe writes, "As I say, it's all one giant metaphor for King's addiction. Metaphor is there in all fiction if you look for it, of course, but this book aches with symbolism."

So how is Cujo a metaphor for drug addiction?  Because he is a great pet -- until bitten.  Once he is rabid, the dog ravages terror on innocent people.  Smythe offers,
He – Cujo, King – is trapped inside whatever's driving his body for him. He hurts those he loves. He is brutal and remorseless, because he is not himself. Those who would stop him are cut down or trapped. They can only look at him through windows and pray he leaves them alone, or that they get a chance to stop him.
And how is Tad a symbol of addiction?
"Even when the demon is dead, it still kills them. Well, no. Actually, what kills Tad is his desperate need for a drink."
Even the structure of the book  is a symbol to Smythe of King's addiction.  The book is a rush toward the end because King is "unrelenting" in his addiction.

Smythe likes the book a lot, and says it is even more "tremendous" when you know the back story.

Now, here's what I find myself  wondering: Do we really think Stephen King meant for the dog to be a symbol of drug addiction?  Or the boy a symbol of alcoholism?  Symbolism and metaphor don't work unless there is intent on the authors part.  Did King mean to show a boy trapped in a car as a symbol of his own entrapment?  I'm not sure at all King intended that.  I think King meant to write a novel about a dog.  That seems shallow after  all the work Smythe did to get us to see the book at a deeper level -- but I just can't help the surface reading here!

Look, I'm glad to go deep and see metaphors.  I'm a preacher!  The Bible is full of symbolism, metaphor and typology.  Even with Scripture (especially with Scripture) you have to have some sense that there was either intent on the authors part to make the metaphor or on God's part to include it in the text.  Reading metaphor back into a text long after its composition is simply spinning your own  application.  Or, more bluntly:  It's making stuff up to portray yourself as deep.

This stuff about metaphor presses me a little because I see it abused so often.  It leads to bad exegesis and blurs the authors real intents.  Ever been in a Bible study where every word symbolized something else ?  "So when Jesus is born -- what does the manger represent?"  A MANGER!  If  you make the manger something other  than a feeding trough a baby was laid in, you lose focus on what the account is really about.  Same for novels!  To get too focused on your own interpretation of a metaphor the author never intended will cause you to miss the authors true intent.

So what is Cujo?  As far as writing goes, it is King working to limit himself.  He restricts the story to a woman and a boy trapped by a dog.  He would press his skills further with Gerald's Game, binding a woman to the bed.  How do I know this?  Because King said so!  He did tell us that The Shining is a picture of addiction.

Often you wouldn't get a writers symbolism unless he told you.  Needful Things, which I loved, is a satire of the greed of the 1980's.  How do I know that?  King said so!  (source: Time) Having the authors interpretation helps, right?  Otherwise you can read anything into anything!

Is Huck Finn about slavery?  You bet!  The message isn't even hidden.  But what if I said Ray Bradbury's The Martian Chronicles is a commentary on the dangers of space exploration.  Is there a problem with that?  Yes!   Bradbury never said that was the message of the book.  It seems much more that the Martian Chronicles is about stewardship and kindness.  We are to stewards of whatever we are given (Earth or Mars) and resist the need to fight and beat down everything we encounter.  The book can serve as a warning against atomic warfare, because Bradbury was actually concerned about those things.  But you can't make it about anything, or in the end the book itself loses meaning in the commentary.  The same is true of Cujo.

Symbolism has no weight without authors intent.

2004 Salem’s Lot Mini-Series




Since I just finished reading about Salem’s Lot, and watching the 1978 mini-series, I also gave the 2004 miniseries a whirl.  (181 minutes)

Composer Christopher Gordon's site notes, "Salem's Lot premieres on the TNT cable channel on June 20th and 21st, 2004 to be broadcast throughout the summer and shown worldwide later in the year."

I’m going to tell you now, I liked it.

The less likable stuff:

I’m reading a lot of fans who absolutely hated this film, and probably with good reason.  There’s a lot to hate here!  In particular, the story is so heavily changed at unnecessary points.

When King gave us the unabridged version of The Stand he pointed out that we would not find old characters behaving in new ways.  Their behavior would remain consistent with what we found in the abridgement.  I think that is what fans also expect of movies.  We’re okay with new scenes, or even story changes – so long as characters remain consistent with who they are in the novel.  But in this version, Father Callahan in particular is a very different character.  And, for a movie that wanted to so honor King’s work, it doesn’t make sense to mess up the Callahan character, who is necessary for the Dark Tower.

Another example is the story of Dr. Cody.  He is tricked into an affair, and then extorted.  This is to combine another story from the novel – but it doesn’t work with Cody’s character in the book.

Some of the complaining about this movie is just ridiculous.  One website whined that the movie’s narration is not read by Rob Lowe in the same voice that he acts in the movie.  That’s because. . . he’s narrating!  

Now, for what I did like. . .


1. I liked the references to other King works.
  • The music in the background of the bar: Stand By Me.
  • Rob Lowe also starred in The Stand.
  • Andre Braugher, who plays Matt Burke also played Brent Norton in The Mist.
  • Father Calahan is played by James Cromwell, who also played the warden in The Green Mile.
  • Background as they search for missing children, “Shut up, Cujo.”

2. This is an all star cast!  Donald Southerland, Rob Lowe both do great.

3.This version does a nice job of telling more of the back story than the original mini-series.  It also doesn’t have that strange 70s tv feel.  The narration quotes large passages from the book as the Lot is described.

4.  I really like the Marsten House!  The inside is delapadated, like a long forsaken building might be expected to be.

5. I like the dark, shadowy Barlow in this.

6. Oh, them Vampires are a nasty brew!  Very nice.  I like the way the vampires leap about and crawl naturally on the ceiling.  A very nice, freaky, touch!  They feel like real animals in human skin.

7. At points, this version is much closer to the novel.  Not only is the narration drawn directly from the book, but the scene in which Barlow confronts the priest is very similiar.  Allowing the vampire to speak is great, and Rutger Hauer (who plays Kurt Barlow) does it so well.  He doesn’t turn into Bella L., or try and be anything other than Mr. Barlow.  He is energetic, condescending and flat out mean.  This is a scary Barlow.

8. It is neat when people get bit.  For all the fear they have of getting gnawed on by a vamp, once it actually happens, the experience appears euphoric.

The review at 80's fear notes:
“The smaller touches often work the best, such as Petrie’s models now including Cenobites instead of the standard Universal monsters or the subtle way the abuse committed by the young mother against her baby is handled. Donald Sutherland is great as Straker, Dan Byrd is good as Mark Petrie, while Rutger Hauer and Andre Braugher give great performances in slightly underwritten roles that keep them offscreen too long. The Marsten house also appears a much more menacing structure, looming over the town, while 90% of the second half gets things right and manage to stay fairly close to the novel (at least until the stupid character change in Callahan, especially stupid given the character’s tales of the events following Salem’s Lot in the same year’s novel Wolves Of The Calla), the fifth of the Dark Towerseries.” (HERE)

The Music

Composer Christopher Gordon has a lot of information about the music in this mini-series(HERE)


Asked if he read the book, Gordon replied: "By the time I came on to the project the film was nearing the end of editing. I haven't read the book and I think it is important that the composer score the film that's in front of him or her. There can be quite a difference in structure, interpretation and tone from the script by the time the director has shaped it and the actors, cinematographer and editor have brought their ideas to it. So the book is even further removed. The composer's inspiration and challenges are what's on the screen."

Gordon's site also notes:
For this lavish production, Christopher has paired with internationally-renowned vocal soloist Lisa Gerrard, whose distinctive work with composer Hans Zimmer on Gladiator (2000) garnered her a Golden Globe. For Salem's Lot, Lisa jointly-contributed to three cues, which are represented on the soundtrack album as "Bloody Pirates, "Converting The Priest", and "Salem's Lot Theme". Lisa also composed "Salem's Lot Aria", with Patrick Cassidy, and "Free in Spirit". 
Recorded between October and December, 2003 at the newly-constructed Trackdown Scoring Stage in Sydney, the score to Salem's Lot was brought alive by the choir Cantillation and the composer's regular session orchestra, Pro Musica Sydney. Gordon's score, whilst constructed around a diatonic key centre, derives a proportion of its material from a series of aleatoric cells and harmonic clusters used to form a structured montage. Thematically, his music is driven by a need to define strength in the face of sheer adversity, accentuating the nature of the evil that has overridden the Marsten House and which now pervades Jerusalem's Lot.

Cujo Goes To Iran

Iran Book News Agency has a post announcing "Cujo" has been translated into Persian and is headed for Iran.  The translation was done by Maryam Malakouti and will be released by Ofogh Publications.

The article reminds us that the 1981 novel was one King has said he really doesn't remember writing!  It also gives some background on the name Cujo, which is based on "the nom de guerre of Willie Wolfe, one of the men responsible for orchestrating Patty Hearst's kidnapping and indoctrination into the Symbionese Liberation Army."


Other King novels already published in Persian include "Blaze", "Dreamcatcher", "The Green Mile", and "Cell."  that's interesting, because those works are all less religious than other works by King.  I wonder if that has any impact on deciding which books to translate and publish in Iran.

The article is HERE

thanks to Bryant Burnette

Cujo And Mars Needs Moms






I watched what might be the worst movie ever the other night -- but the list of possibilities is so long, who really knows.  The movie was "Santa Clause Conquers The Martians."  It ranks up there with Plan 9 From Outer Space.  Really spiffy stuff. 

Tonight my kids and I were watching "Mars needs moms."  At some point I narrowed my eyes and looked up from the computer screen, "Hey!  This is almost the same plot as Santa Clause Conquers the Martians!"  This brought roars of protest from my children.  First, they thought Santa Clause Conquers The Martians was a great movie.  But then, these people will watch reruns of the Smurfs.  Second, they felt Mars Needs Moms was far superior to the Santa movie.  All the same to me, though.  Mars needs Santa -- Mars needs moms. . . you can't tell me someone wasn't making a play on the old film.

Early in Mars Needs Moms the cats name is called.  YEP!  It's Cujo!  Even my children caught it.  That's pretty cool, and definitely gives it grounds to rise far, far, far above Santa Clause Conquers The Martians.

But a cat named Cujo?

5 most frightening killer animal flicks


The associated press has an article on the 5 most frightening killer animal flicks. Sorry, attack of the killer bees was not on there. Nor was the 1977 classic William Shatner "Kingdom of the Spiders."
.
included were:
— Jaws (1975)
— The Birds (1963)
— Cujo (1983)
— Grizzly Man (2005)
— Them! (1954)
.
About Cujo, the article stated: Man’s best friend becomes his most fearsome, furry enemy in this thriller based on the Stephen King novel. The name alone is so synonymous with killer canines, it’s become shorthand. And it’s not like some yippy, annoying dog that turns into a monster, like a Yorkie or a Chihuahua. No, this is a friendly, lovable St. Bernard, a breed that’s traditionally been known as a reliable caretaker, who goes wild after he’s bitten by a rabid bat and wreaks havoc on a small town. It’s sort of a squeamish thing, the idea of having to fight and take down an animal that’s traditionally considered a family member, but Cujo suggests that primal survival instincts will always win out in the end.
.
also check out this review of Cujo: http://www.benevolentstreet.com/?p=1437

10 Scariest Stephen King Novels


scifiwire posted "10 scariest Stephen King novels." http://scifiwire.com/2009/10/10-scariest-stephen-king.php So here it is. See if you see a problem:
.
1. The Shining (1977)
2. 'Salem's Lot (1975)
3. Pet Semetary (1982)
4. Cujo (1981)
5. Misery (1987)
6. The Stand (Complete and Uncut Version) (1990)
7. The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon (1999)
8. Cell (2006)
9. Gerald's Game (1992)
10. Carrie (1974)
.
Do these people read Stephen King very often? Are these the only books they've read?
.
As Halloween approaches, the most frustrating thing is that everyone publishes their scary book list on Halloween. Kinda misses the "season" -- doesn't it? You aren't going to read 10, or even 1, scary book just on Halloween. And after Halloween, let's all face it, Christmas season begins. Now that's truly scary!
.
First of all: Geralds Game and Cujo, while intense and well written, are not exactly scary! That was the list, right? Scary. So, let me offer my list of truly scary King books:
.
1. It. Why didn't IT even make their list? A monster stalks little kids -- and scifiwire wasn't scared? Come on! I was shivering under the sheets. This book is the true face of horror.
.
2. The Shining. A haunted hotel. This was great
.
3. 'Salem's Lot. Dracula comes to America. True Halloween stuff
.
4. Needful Things. The fight in the street, knifes and such -- wonderful. Gory. Truly scary
.
5. Pet Semetary. A dead child buried in ancient Indian grounds comes back alive. . . and ready to kill mommy and daddy. Anyone not scared? It's like a haunting version of Christianity. Resurrection gone bad!
.
6. The Stand. This one has scenes that are scary. The tunnel, other Abigail and the wolves, etc
.
7. Desperation. A book that opens with a crucified cat should be on anyones list of most scary King novels. And Tac the Demon Sheriff deserves a little more credit for his scaryness.
.
8. Cell. First King brought Vampires to America, then modern America got a cell phone call: The zombies are coming!
.
9. The Dark Half. What if your alter-ego was alive and well -- killing people? I thought it was scary.
.
10. Carrie. Short and to the point, I think this book is really more a novella. However, it is definately spooky. It rightly set the stage to typecast the author as the King of Horror.
.
Anyone want to offer their 10 scariest King novels?
.
.